NPR Takes Lead From NYT, Promises Even Better Coverage Going To One (1) Environmental Reporter

[hatrack]

EDIT

The move to shift reporters off the environment beat was driven by an interest to cover other fields more in depth, said Anne Gudenkauf, senior supervising editor of NPR's science desk. "We'll think of a project we want to do and the kind of staff that we need to do it, and then organize ourselves that way," she said. "One of the things we always do is change in response to the changing world." Gudenkauf also said she doesn't "feel like [the environment] necessarily requires dedicated reporters" because so many other staffers cover the subject, along with their other beats.

Richard Harris, widely known as NPR's climate science guru (he has reported on international treaty talks since 1992), started covering biomedicine in March. Elizabeth Shogren, who largely focused on the Environmental Protection Agency, is no longer at NPR. Vikki Valentine, the team's editor, is now lead editor for the outlet's global health and development coverage, which includes a new project launched this summer using a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Reporter Chris Joyce, a 21-year veteran of NPR, remains.

The number of content pieces tagged "environment" that NPR publishes (which include things like Q&As and breaking news snippets) has declined since January, according to an analysis by InsideClimate News, dropping from the low 60s to mid-40s every month. A year-to-year comparison shows that the outlet published 68 environment stories in September 2013 and 43 in September 2014. Last month, about 40 percent of that content was climate-related due to NPR's cities project, as well as the media-intensive People's Climate March and the UN climate summit in New York City. The rest was a mix of stories on agriculture and food, land conservation, wildlife, pollution and global health.

Gudenkauf said she hasn't noticed "any real change in the volume of material...Just as the news about climate changes from week to week, month to month, and year to year, so does our coverage."

EDIT

http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20141024/npr-reduces-its-environment-team-one-reporter

[RiverLover]

1. Despicable

At a time when we need honest environmental coverage more than ever.

Is NPR accepting money from Koch too?

[druidity33]

2. Ugh.. K&R, nt.

[Triana]

3. How much control do Kochs et al have over PBS/NPR?

Did they ask listeners whether they want less on environment? Evidently not. It's typically American to ignore huge issues facing the nation & world until it's far too late, choosing instead to 'entertain' ourselves with petty 'divide & conquer' distractions tossed out by conservative extremists. Meanwhile, Democrats mostly cower, fiddle and track to the center - exactly the OPPOSITE of what they should be doing. While abortion/LGBT rights/drug war etc are important issues, they keep us fighting amongst ourselves and blind the country and the world to the most substantially destructive moral issues which face us all - which are SO enormous and would be SO much trouble for us to actually work toward fixing. So we don't bother. We'll be the death of ourselves due to lack of courage, immoral narcissism and greed, and chronic ignorance fed by aformentioned con extremists and the media which they control (all of it), of which NPR is part. If there is a Devil in this world, they are it. That, and human inability (myself included) to keep our minds focused on the bigger picture and to so easily be distracted.

Bad move on the part of NPR. But - I gave up on them long ago.

[corkhead]

4. They need the resources for Ebola & ISIS reporters because that is all they cover anymore