Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 12:29 PM Jan 2015

North Dakota: oil producers aim to cut radioactive waste bills

Source: Reuters

North Dakota: oil producers aim to cut radioactive waste bills

BY ERNEST SCHEYDER
WILLISTON, N.D. Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:18am EST

(Reuters) - North Dakota's oil industry is pushing to change the state's radioactive waste disposal laws as part of a broad effort to conserve cash as oil prices tumble.

The waste, which becomes slightly radioactive as part of the hydraulic fracturing process that churns up isotopes locked underground, must be trucked out of state. That's because rules prohibit North Dakota landfills from accepting anything but miniscule amounts of radiation.

The most common form of radioactive waste is a filter sock, a mesh tube resembling a sandbag through which fracking water is pumped before it's injected back into the earth. Tank and pipeline sludge are also radioactive.

It's not clear how much of this waste is generated, as North Dakota officials only began requiring tracking last year; final 2014 reports aren't due until next month. Some put the number at 70 tons per day; others say 27 tons.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/28/us-usa-north-dakota-waste-idUSKBN0L11Z420150128

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Dakota: oil producers aim to cut radioactive waste bills (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2015 OP
Like most conservatives these days, ignoring the future Panich52 Jan 2015 #1
North Dakota's standard is reported in a confusing way caraher Jan 2015 #2

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
1. Like most conservatives these days, ignoring the future
Wed Jan 28, 2015, 06:28 PM
Jan 2015

Maybe the figure that if South Dakota can have a Badlands Nat'l Park, turning areas of their own state into 'badlands' is a positive thing.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
2. North Dakota's standard is reported in a confusing way
Thu Jan 29, 2015, 12:12 AM
Jan 2015
North Dakota's landfills currently can only accept waste with radioactive material up to 5 picocuries, a measurement of the radioactivity found in a gram of material.

A banana has, on average, 3.5 picocuries of radiation.


The reporter should have written that the rule is 5 pCi per gram, rather than suggesting a pCi is somehow ordinarily standardized to a gram. Considering that a typical banana has a mass over 100 grams, the present regulation actually allows waste well over 100 times more radioactive per unit mass than a banana. The writing makes North Dakota's regulation seem insanely overzealous.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»North Dakota: oil produce...