Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumClimate Change Debate Fueled by ‘Echo Chambers,’ New Study Finds
http://www.sesync.org/news/climate-change-debate-echo-chambers[font face=Serif][font size=5]Climate Change Debate Fueled by Echo Chambers, New Study Finds[/font]
May 25, 2015
[font size=3]College Park, Md and Annapolis, Md A new study from researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) and the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) demonstrates that the highly contentious debate on climate change is fueled in part by how information flows throughout policy networks.
The UMD and SESYNC researchers found that echo chamberssocial network structures in which individuals with the same viewpoint share information with each otherplay a significant role in climate policy communication. The researchers say that echo chambers may help explain why, despite a well-documented scientific consensus on the causes and drivers of global changes in climate, half of U.S. senators voted earlier this year against an amendment affirming that climate change is human-induced.
The researchers then used an exponential random graph (ERG) modela complex statistical model for analyzing data about social and other networksto test for the presence and significance of echo chambers among members of the U.S. climate policy network. In the echo, two people who have the same outlook or opinion on a relevant issue share information, reinforcing what each already believes. In the chamber, individuals hear information originating from one initial source through multiple channels.
Our research underscores how important it is for people on both sides of the climate debate to be careful about where they get their information. If their sources are limited to those that repeat and amplify a single perspective, they cant be certain about the reliability or objectivity of their information, Jasny said.
[/font][/font]
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2666.htmlMay 25, 2015
[font size=3]College Park, Md and Annapolis, Md A new study from researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) and the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) demonstrates that the highly contentious debate on climate change is fueled in part by how information flows throughout policy networks.
The UMD and SESYNC researchers found that echo chamberssocial network structures in which individuals with the same viewpoint share information with each otherplay a significant role in climate policy communication. The researchers say that echo chambers may help explain why, despite a well-documented scientific consensus on the causes and drivers of global changes in climate, half of U.S. senators voted earlier this year against an amendment affirming that climate change is human-induced.
The researchers then used an exponential random graph (ERG) modela complex statistical model for analyzing data about social and other networksto test for the presence and significance of echo chambers among members of the U.S. climate policy network. In the echo, two people who have the same outlook or opinion on a relevant issue share information, reinforcing what each already believes. In the chamber, individuals hear information originating from one initial source through multiple channels.
Our research underscores how important it is for people on both sides of the climate debate to be careful about where they get their information. If their sources are limited to those that repeat and amplify a single perspective, they cant be certain about the reliability or objectivity of their information, Jasny said.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 632 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Climate Change Debate Fueled by ‘Echo Chambers,’ New Study Finds (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
May 2015
OP
procon
(15,805 posts)1. And it's not just climate change.
Echo chambers are the stock and trade of the whole rightwing media schtick. Its Fox News writ large. The MO is to quote some outlier climate change denier and then have the whole stable of news readers, pundits and celebrity guests join in the echo chamber to repeat the same gobbledegook in a constant loop.
If the typical Fox News viewer is anything like my sadly deluded and brainwashed brother, they confidently point to to Fox and proclaim that "everyone on the news" is saying they same thing; therefore it must be true. Lather. Rinse. Repeat.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)2. same wiuth Fox viewers: all they watch is Fox, while non-Fox-viewrs got
all their news from all sources but Fox
the idiot analysts of course said "more proof of media polarization" when it's the exact opposite of polarization