Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumAXA CEO (Insurance): "A 2C World Might Be Insurable, A 4C World Certainly Would Not Be"
Henri de Castries, the CEO and Chairman of AXA, one of the worlds largest insurers, has set the bar high for institutional investors when it comes to acting on climate risk and opting for divestment. The French group has more than $1trillion in assets under management.
It is our responsibility, as a long term institutional investor, to consider carbon as a risk and to accompany the global energy transition. The burning of coal to produce energy is today clearly one of the biggest obstacles preventing us from reaching the 2°C target. For this reason, AXA has decided to divest from the companies most exposed to coal-related activities for the assets managed internally said the company in a press release on May 22, 2015.
At a business and climate change conference in Paris that day Mr de Castries stated that AXA would sell 500m ($544m) of coal assets between now and the end of this year. The company also said it would put some 3bn into green investments between now and 2020, mainly in clean technology, green infrastructure and green bonds.
The debate is no longer about whether, its about when. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is unequivocal: the climate system is warming, and many of the observed changes are unprecedented he told the conference. And he spelt out what this meant for those in the same line of business. So what does this means concretely for an insurer? Let me start by recalling that insurance stands on two legs: protection of people, goods and physical assets on the one side and investments, to enable this protection, on the other. This makes insurance one of the only industries with a role to play in both the adaptation and mitigation aspects of the climate issue he said.
EDIT
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dinamedland/2015/05/26/a-2c-world-might-be-insurable-a-4c-world-certainly-would-not-be/
phantom power
(25,966 posts)where the climate mitigation efforts are all bankrolled by the (re)insurance industry.
Nihil
(13,508 posts)> The French group has more than $1trillion in assets under management.
> ...
> AXA would sell 500m ($544m) of coal assets between now and the end of this year.
... this smacks of simple greenwashing (unless someone can show me that their total coal assets
are appropriately tiny ... which would frankly astound me given how big they are ...).
Finishline42
(1,091 posts)I wonder what part the breaching of the coal containment pond in East TN had on the coal industry? TVA paid over $1 billion in the clean up effort that I don't think is anywhere near finished. I would guess that TVA had insurance on such an event?
There are over 400 such ponds in the US - each an unfunded liability - that until the Kingston TN breach was just theory on what the damage would be. Once the insurance industry had a known claim to base the risk on, premiums I'm sure skyrocketed.
Just another nail in the coffin of coal burning power plants.