Pipeline spill not only danger to Calif beaches

[Panich52]

SkyTruth

Oily globs close SoCal beaches – Where did they come from?
By David Manthos on May 28, 2015 03:50 pm

Yesterday afternoon oily globs from an unknown source began washing ashore in Southern California, prompting officials to close Manhattan Beach, Hermosa Beach, and Redondo Beach. Reports say "tar-like globs ranging from the size of golf balls to footballs began washing ashore along a six-mile stretch of coastline." The U.S. Coast Guard has yet to identify a source, but did confirm the material was a petroleum-based product. Last week a pipeline spill of over 100,000 gallons of crude oil west of Santa Barbara dominated the headlines, so there has been some speculation that this oil came from that spill. However, thanks to satellite imagery, we believe we have found a more likely source. 

... Lifeguards at Manhattan Beach first reported the "tar-balls" washing ashore around 12:30 pm PDT, approximately 30 hours later. The image appears to show an oily slick only six miles west of Manhattan Beach and covering approximately 1,000 acres of Santa Monica Bay.

Sometimes we see bilge dumps from passing vessels ... but this slick doesn't appear to have any vessel associated with it and it isn't the right shape. So we started looking for any infrastructure around Santa Monica that could be the source of this pollution event. That is when we found this map of the five-mile sewage outfall from the Hyperion Wastewater Treatment plant at Playa del Ray. ...

Given how close the slick is to the Hyperion 5-Mile Outfall, we believe this could be a source for the contaminants washing up on Manhattan, Hermosa, and Redondo Beaches. It is not impossible that tarballs from the pipeline spill at Refugio Beach State Park travelled over 100 miles to wash up en mass on these beaches, but it seems less likely than a discharge of some kind from the Hyperion Wastewater Treatment plant. 

Furthermore, we found more evidence which supports the notion that waste from the outfalls could reach shore given the right conditions. Back in 2006 the City of Los Angeles shut down Hyperion's 5-mile outfall for inspection, diverting the wastewater to the shorter 1-mile outfall. Scientists at the Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System (SCCOOS) tracked the waste from the shorter outflow pipe and modeled the behavior of the plume. Bear in mind that the animation below shows the behavior of a pollution plume back in Winter 2006 from a point-source four miles closer to shore, but you can see how it is possible that waste from the outfalls could turn toward shore and contaminate the beaches.

More, w/ sev satellite pix:
http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=e8a012de013399ca3907e3133&id=92cf3aa758&e=4f946530e5
•

[JayhawkSD]

1. There is an awful lot of speculation there.

"It's located near the outfall, so it must have come from the outfall." Except that correlation is not causation, and tarry petroleum is hardly a common discharge from a sewage treatment plant.

"Discharge from the one mile outlet made its way back to the beaches, so we can assume that discharge from the five mile output could have done so as well." Except that ocean currents don't work that way, and the reason they replaced the one mile outlet with the five mile outlet is to prevent the discharge from coming back in to the beaches. It's not impossible that discharge from the five mile outlet reyurned to the beaches, but the assumption that it did so based on the discharge from the one mile outlet is not reasonable at all.

It's entirely possible that the substance is seepage from the ocean floor. That has been happening along the coast for many years, and is not unrelated to the La Brea Tar Pits.

In due course we will have an analysis of the chemical signature of the substance and will have a lot more to go on. Until then this sort of idle speculation does a lot more harm than good.