Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
Thu Jun 4, 2015, 04:14 PM Jun 2015

Science publishes new NOAA analysis: Data show no recent slowdown in global warming

Last edited Thu Jun 4, 2015, 05:33 PM - Edit history (4)

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2015-06/aaft-eaa060115.php
[font face=Serif]Public Release: 4-Jun-2015
[font size=5]Evidence against a global warming hiatus?[/font]
American Association for the Advancement of Science



[font size=3]An analysis using updated global surface temperature data disputes the existence of a 21st century global warming slowdown described in studies including the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment. The new analysis suggests no discernable decrease in the rate of warming between the second half of the 20th century, a period marked by manmade warming, and the first fifteen years of the 21st century, a period dubbed a global warming "hiatus." Numerous studies have been done to explain the possible causes of the apparent hiatus. Here, Karl and colleagues focused on aspects of the hiatus influenced by biases from temperature observation networks, which are always changing. Using updated and corrected temperature observations taken at thousands of weather observing stations over land and as many commercial ships and buoys at sea, the researchers show that temperatures in the 21st century did not plateau, as thought. Instead, the rate of warming during the first fifteen years of the 21st century is at least as great as that in the last half of the 20th century, suggesting warming is continuing apace. According to these and other results, the authors suggest the warming slowdown was an illusion, an artifact of earlier analyses.

###

Article #16: "Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus," by T.R. Karl; A. Arguez; B. Huang; J.H. Lawrimore; M.J. Menne; T.C. Peterson; R.S. Vose; H.-M. Zhang at National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Asheville, NC; J.R. McMahon at LMI in McLean, VA. [/font][/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5632 (Doesn’t work yet.)
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2015/06/03/science.aaa5632.full


(Please note, the following is from a US Federal Government web site. — Copyright concerns are nil.)
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2015/noaa-analysis-journal-science-no-slowdown-in-global-warming-in-recent-years.html
[font face=Serif][font size=5]Science publishes new NOAA analysis: Data show no recent slowdown in global warming[/font]

June 4, 2015

[font size=3]A new study published online today in the journal Science finds that the rate of global warming during the last 15 years has been as fast as or faster than that seen during the latter half of the 20th Century. The study refutes the notion that there has been a slowdown or "hiatus" in the rate of global warming in recent years.


The study is the work of a team of scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) National Centers for Environmental Information* (NCEI) using the latest global surface temperature data.

"Adding in the last two years of global surface temperature data and other improvements in the quality of the observed record provide evidence that contradict the notion of a hiatus in recent global warming trends," said Thomas R. Karl, L.H.D., Director, NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information. "Our new analysis suggests that the apparent hiatus may have been largely the result of limitations in past datasets, and that the rate of warming over the first 15 years of this century has, in fact, been as fast or faster than that seen over the last half of the 20th century."

The apparent observed slowing or decrease in the upward rate of global surface temperature warming has been nicknamed the "hiatus." The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report, released in stages between September 2013 and November 2014, concluded that the upward global surface temperature trend from 1998­­-2012 was markedly lower than the trend from 1951-2012.

Since the release of the IPCC report, NOAA scientists have made significant improvements in the calculation of trends and now use a global surface temperature record that includes the most recent two years of data, 2013 and 2014--the hottest year on record. The calculations also use improved versions of both sea surface temperature and land surface air temperature datasets. One of the most substantial improvements is a correction that accounts for the difference in data collected from buoys and ship-based data.


Prior to the mid-1970s, ships were the predominant way to measure sea surface temperatures, and since then buoys have been used in increasing numbers. Compared to ships, buoys provide measurements of significantly greater accuracy. "In regards to sea surface temperature, scientists have shown that across the board, data collected from buoys are cooler than ship-based data," said Dr. Thomas C. Peterson, principal scientist at NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information and one of the study's authors. "In order to accurately compare ship measurements and buoy measurements over the long-term, they need to be compatible. Scientists have developed a method to correct the difference between ship and buoy measurements, and we are using this in our trend analysis."

In addition, more detailed information has been obtained regarding each ship's observation method. This information was also used to provide improved corrections for changes in the mix of observing methods.

New analyses with these data demonstrate that incomplete spatial coverage also led to underestimates of the true global temperature change previously reported in the 2013 IPCC report. The integration of dozens of data sets has improved spatial coverage over many areas, including the Arctic, where temperatures have been rapidly increasing in recent decades. For example, the release of the International Surface Temperature Initiative databank, integrated with NOAA's Global Historical Climatology Network-Daily dataset and forty additional historical data sources, has more than doubled the number of weather stations available for analysis.

Lastly, the incorporation of additional years of data, 2013 and 2014, with 2014 being the warmest year on record, has had a notable impact on the temperature assessment. As stated by the IPCC, the "hiatus" period 1998-2012 is short and began with an unusually warm El Niño year. However, over the full period of record, from 1880 to present, the newly calculated warming trend is not substantially different than reported previously (0.68°C / Century (new) vs 0.65°C / Century (old)), reinforcing that the new corrections mainly have in impact in recent decades.

On the Web
  • To learn more, see the recently published paper in Science, which details the corrected calculations and updated analyses in its supplementary material.

  • To see NCEI's collection of climate monitoring reference information, see: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/

  • For operational NCEI data, see the Climate-at-a-Glance visualization tool, see: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/

* Note: NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) is the merger of the National Climatic Data Center, National Geophysical Data Center, and National Oceanographic Data Center as approved in the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Public Law 113-235. From the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun and from million-year-old sediment records to near real-time satellite images, NCEI is the nation's leading authority for environmental information and data. For more information go to: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/news/coming-soon-national-centers-environmental-information

NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth's environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Join us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and our other social media channels. [/font][/font]
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Science publishes new NOAA analysis: Data show no recent slowdown in global warming (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 OP
Loud Pig Squeals heard from Climate deniers on release of report. mackdaddy Jun 2015 #1
Time will tell LouisvilleDem Jun 2015 #2
Re: Why they chose to adjust the more accurate buoy data upwards … OKIsItJustMe Jun 2015 #3

LouisvilleDem

(303 posts)
2. Time will tell
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 09:56 AM
Jun 2015

This paper has received a lot of attention since it was released, and it remains to be seen whether it's findings will be reproduced by others. Immediate skepticism is warranted simply because all 6 of the major temperature records (HadCRUT4, GISS, NCDC, UAH, RSS, Berkeley Earth) all show a hiatus to some degree. The people that maintain those temperature records (some of them--like Gavin Schmidt of RealClimate--are prominent advocates for doing something about climate change) are unlikely to simply roll over and admit they've been doing it wrong for years.

One thing that has been pointed out already relates to this paragraph from the article:

Prior to the mid-1970s, ships were the predominant way to measure sea surface temperatures, and since then buoys have been used in increasing numbers. Compared to ships, buoys provide measurements of significantly greater accuracy. "In regards to sea surface temperature, scientists have shown that across the board, data collected from buoys are cooler than ship-based data," said Dr. Thomas C. Peterson, principal scientist at NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information and one of the study's authors. "In order to accurately compare ship measurements and buoy measurements over the long-term, they need to be compatible. Scientists have developed a method to correct the difference between ship and buoy measurements, and we are using this in our trend analysis."


Apparently what the scientists did to make ship and buoy measurements "compatible" was to adjust the buoy data upwards by 0.12°C. This makes little sense, given that (as noted) the buoys provide measurements of significantly greater accuracy. It is universally acknowledged that because ship based measurements are collected by sampling water that is collected from the engine intakes, heat from the engines and the ship structure itself causes the temperature reading to come in higher than it should. Why they chose to adjust the more accurate buoy data upwards rather to adjust the less accurate ship data downwards needs to be explained.

Time will tell.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,938 posts)
3. Re: Why they chose to adjust the more accurate buoy data upwards …
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 11:35 AM
Jun 2015

I would say that it is because they had a large database of measurements from ships. They can either raise the measurements for the last decade, or lower them for the last century…

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Science publishes new NOA...