Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 09:04 PM Nov 2015

Livestock falling ill in fracking regions

BY ELIZABETH ROYTE, FOOD & ENVIRONMENT REPORTING NETWORK

In the midst of the domestic energy boom, livestock on farms near oil- and gas-drilling operations nationwide have been quietly falling sick and dying. While scientists have yet to isolate cause and effect, many suspect chemicals used in drilling and hydrofracking (or “fracking”) operations are poisoning animals through the air, water or soil.

Earlier this year, Michelle Bamberger, an Ithaca, N.Y., veterinarian, and Robert Oswald, a professor of molecular medicine at Cornell’s College of Veterinary Medicine, published the first and only peer-reviewed report to suggest a link between fracking and illness in food animals.

The authors compiled 24 case studies of farmers in six shale-gas states whose livestock experienced neurological, reproductive and acute gastrointestinal problems after being exposed — either accidentally or incidentally — to fracking chemicals in the water or air. The article, published in “New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health,” describes how scores of animals died over the course of several years. Fracking industry proponents challenged the study, since the authors neither identified the farmers nor ran controlled experiments to determine how specific fracking compounds might affect livestock.

The death toll is insignificant when measured against the nation’s livestock population (some 97 million beef cattle go to market each year), but environmental advocates believe these animals constitute an early warning.

Exposed livestock “are making their way into the food system, and it’s very worrisome to us,” Bamberger said. “They live in areas that have tested positive for air, water and soil contamination. Some of these chemicals could appear in milk and meat products made from these animals.”

more
http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/11/29/15547283-livestock-falling-ill-in-fracking-regions

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Livestock falling ill in fracking regions (Original Post) n2doc Nov 2015 OP
What? Delmette Nov 2015 #1
K&R. People are getting ill in fracking regions, so I'm not surprised cattle are too. Overseas Nov 2015 #2
+1000 nt Mnemosyne Nov 2015 #5
Good gawd... SoapBox Nov 2015 #3
Not at all surprised 2naSalit Nov 2015 #4
That can was opened Thursday Nov 29, 2012 at 1:08 PM OKIsItJustMe Dec 2015 #9
Thanks 2naSalit Dec 2015 #16
Don't expect Thespian2 Nov 2015 #6
...and California is using frack water to water crops.. Champion Jack Dec 2015 #7
This comment is so terribly worrisome that I'd appreciate a link to any articles etc. documenting it hedda_foil Dec 2015 #8
Search engines are wonderful things OKIsItJustMe Dec 2015 #10
They are, indeed. Thank you for educating me about this awful practice. hedda_foil Dec 2015 #11
You’re welcome! OKIsItJustMe Dec 2015 #12
That's flat out obscene ... a total dereliction of duty by the state. hedda_foil Dec 2015 #13
(Oops… oh well… no harm, no foul… right?) OKIsItJustMe Dec 2015 #14
her support for fracking is one of the big reasons i say no to hc questionseverything Dec 2015 #15

Delmette

(522 posts)
1. What?
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 10:31 PM
Nov 2015

How can investigators test for specific compounds that might be to blame when the fracking companies won't report what they are injecting into the wells!!!???

2naSalit

(86,307 posts)
4. Not at all surprised
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 11:09 PM
Nov 2015

I was wondering when this can of worms would come oozing up to the light of day.

hedda_foil

(16,371 posts)
8. This comment is so terribly worrisome that I'd appreciate a link to any articles etc. documenting it
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 12:25 PM
Dec 2015

Many thanks in advance.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
12. You’re welcome!
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 03:29 PM
Dec 2015

Of perhaps more concern:

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/Waste-Water-from-Oil-Fracking-Injected-into-Clean-Aquifers-282733051.html

[font face=Serif][font size=5]Waste Water from Oil Fracking Injected into Clean Aquifers[/font]

[font size=4]California Dept. of Conservation Deputy Director admits that errors were made[/font]

(Video at the link.)

(Published Friday, Nov. 14, 2014)

[font size=3]State officials allowed oil and gas companies to pump nearly three billion gallons of waste water into underground aquifers that could have been used for drinking water or irrigation.

Those aquifers are supposed to be off-limits to that kind of activity, protected by the EPA.

“It’s inexcusable,” said Hollin Kretzmann, at the Center for Biological Diversity in San Francisco. “At (a) time when California is experiencing one of the worst droughts in history, we’re allowing oil companies to contaminate what could otherwise be very useful ground water resources for irrigation and for drinking. It’s possible these aquifers are now contaminated irreparably.”

California’s Department of Conservation’s Chief Deputy Director, Jason Marshall, told NBC Bay Area, “In multiple different places of the permitting process an error could have been made.”

…[/font][/font]

hedda_foil

(16,371 posts)
13. That's flat out obscene ... a total dereliction of duty by the state.
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 03:41 PM
Dec 2015

And with aquifers so low as a result of the drought, the toxic water isn't even diluted enough to minimize the threat.

OKIsItJustMe

(19,937 posts)
14. (Oops… oh well… no harm, no foul… right?)
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 04:01 PM
Dec 2015
[font face=Serif][font size=3]…

The trade association that represents many of California’s oil and gas companies says the water-injection is a “paperwork issue.” In a statement issued to NBC Bay Area, Western States Petroleum Association spokesman Tupper Hull said “there has never been a bona vide claim or evidence presented that the paperwork confusion resulted in any contamination of drinking supplies near the disputed injection wells.”

…[/font][/font]

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
15. her support for fracking is one of the big reasons i say no to hc
Tue Dec 1, 2015, 05:53 PM
Dec 2015

between the poisons and the earthquakes who the heck would support this?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Livestock falling ill in ...