Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(130,732 posts)
Sun Dec 15, 2019, 09:28 PM Dec 2019

Dec. 16, 2015 TURNING THE PAGES BACK...

'Four years ago, on December 16, 2019, Gen. Wesley Clark (U.S. Army, ret.), former NATO supreme allied commander, Europe, was interviewed by Diane Francis of The Atlantic Council about the situation in Ukraine and its broader impact.

Gen. Clark stated: “We should have given defensive lethal weapons to Ukraine. If we’d given them defensive weapons, many lives could have been saved. There are major human consequences here.”

Echoing Gen. Clark’s statements, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power, who was acting chair of the U.N. Security Council, bluntly stated on December 11, 2015, “Russia continues to arm, train, support and fight alongside separatists in eastern Ukraine.”

As matters stand, Gen. Clark continued, Russia could invade Ukraine with a few brigades, but it won’t for two reasons. The current strategy of harassment and destabilization serves President Vladimir Putin’s overall purpose and, by not overtly using military troops, Mr. Putin believes he can get the Europeans to ease sanctions.

Gen. Clark explained:

“Ukraine is a work in progress by Mr. Putin. He has multiple channels to attack Ukraine, economically, politically, diplomatically, militarily. He wants to get sanctions lifted, so he’s not deepening his [overt] military activities into Ukraine. But every day there are shooting incidents.

“[Putin] has a big game plan and that is to break up the European Union, a weakened NATO, restore Russia’s defensive area [Warsaw Pact] and control Ukraine and Belarus. He’s doing this through covert ops, sabotage in Ukraine, military aggression, the separatist movements, economics, diplomacy, buying people in the EU, and putting FSB money toward environmental groups to protest against fracking to keep Europe dependent on Russian oil and gas.”

“Clearly, Europe has been compromised and had to be dragged into sanctions [against Russia],” he added. “Germany and France bungled things by largely accepting Russia’s terms concerning a ceasefire agreement, then allowing Moscow to flout the agreement without major consequences,” he said.'>>>

http://www.ukrweekly.com/uwwp/dec-16-2015/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Dec. 16, 2015 TURNING THE...