Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Tue Sep 23, 2014, 08:30 AM Sep 2014

Is there still a way out for Iraq?

http://www.thedailystar.net/op-ed/is-there-still-a-way-out-for-iraq-42748



Is there still a way out for Iraq?
Rubi Amatullah

AMERICA, while occupying Iraq, had the power to do anything that was needed to be done. It could require all major groups to come to a consensus as to the basic rules of power sharing as it was done in Tunisia. A commission --consisting of leaders from all three groups as well as some international or UN experts as advisers – could lay down some basic structure principles that would remain as the unchangeable foundation of the constitution to ensure partnership of all the ethnic groups: Shiia, Sunni and Kurds. This consensus should have been done before the Constituent Assembly election.

This was exactly how the most polarized groups in Tunisia – the secularists and the Islamists – came together to form the Ben Achour Commission to lay the ground rules of power sharing before electing the Constituent Assembly members to frame the constitution. The mechanism of Proportional Representation [PR] that was agreed upon before the election played a key role in maintaining the balance. Realizing what was at stake the Ennadha party, under the visionary leadership of Rachid Ghannouchi, compromised and accepted the terms that would compel his party-the most popular party-- to share power with others. Otherwise he realized that the secularists would boycott the election and everyone would lose. They created a win-win state of affairs. The secret of this success is inclusive politics.

If America could rebuild the defeated and devastated enemy countries – Japan and Germany – after the World War II with its Marshall Plan within only 7-years of occupation why the superpower now failed in Iraq even after 9 years? Extraordinary situations require extraordinary measures. If imposing a democratic system and building infrastructures under the military occupation helped Japan and Germany raise a stupendous speed of recovery and progress why it could not be repeated in Iraq in our time when the know-how, capacity and logistics are immensely better now than ever before.

In the absence Ghannouchi in Iraq, if the commission would fail to come to a consensus America still had a choice of bringing in a group of political experts to help to lay the rules that would make the three groups interdependent in running the country. A similar step was taken in Kosovo to avert the strong propensity of revenge and further bloodshed by the Muslim majority against the Serb minority. The constitution itself was dictated and implemented under the leadership of Martti Ahtisaari appointed by the UN. In a very short period of time Kosovo changed and accepted peaceful coexistence.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»Is there still a way out ...