Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2014, 05:24 AM Sep 2014

US combat role in Iraq not off table, Gen. Dempsey says

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/us-combat-role-in-iraq-not-off-table-gen-dempsey-says/



US combat role in Iraq not off table, Gen. Dempsey says
McClatchy Washington Bureau
James Rosen
McClatchy Washington Bureau
Posted with permission from MCT Information Services
September 26, 2014

WASHINGTON — The nation's top military commander refused Friday to back off his controversial stance in Senate testimony that he would recommend committing U.S. troops to combat in Iraq if he believed they were needed to help defeat Islamic State militants.

The steadfastness of Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, revealed a potential gap between President Barack Obama's senior military and political advisers over whether there might once more be American "boots on the ground" in Iraq three years after the last American combat troops left.

In another sign of the expanding American mission in the region, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the first U.S. military personnel had arrived in Saudi Arabia to lay the groundwork for training 5,000 "moderate" Syrian rebels to fight the Islamic State.

Congress last week authorized the training mission but still must consider an administration request for $500 million for the program. The authorization came after Obama said he would expand the U.S. air campaign against the Islamic State from Iraq into Syria, a step that occurred this week with air assaults on 22 locations in Syria.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US combat role in Iraq not off table, Gen. Dempsey says (Original Post) unhappycamper Sep 2014 OP
To be fair this is rather nonsensical. GeorgeGist Sep 2014 #1
I would expect the General to tell us what to expect after we start bombing a new country. unhappycamper Sep 2014 #3
American boots? gwheezie Sep 2014 #2
That was my recollection, as well. n/t ColesCountyDem Sep 2014 #4

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
3. I would expect the General to tell us what to expect after we start bombing a new country.
Sat Sep 27, 2014, 07:03 AM
Sep 2014

Which Dempsey did: we will need boots on the ground to 'finish the job'. The last I heard was this 'job' could take years. (We're almost halfway thru a Thirty Years War.)

What makes anyone think that the results of Iraq 3.0 will be any different than our last two adventures in Iraq?



gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
2. American boots?
Sat Sep 27, 2014, 06:59 AM
Sep 2014

I listened to the entire hearing. Dempsey states boots on the ground doesn't mean American troops I thought he was pretty clear.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Foreign Affairs»US combat role in Iraq no...