Israel/Palestine
Related: About this forumPalestinian UN observer state bid on 29 November
Source: BBC
Palestinian UN observer state bid on 29 November
The Palestinian Authority will present its bid for Palestine to become a UN "non-member observer state" on 29 November, President Mahmoud Abbas says.
The request is being made despite US and Israeli opposition.
Mr Abbas said that if the bid were successful, he would begin negotiations with Israel "the next day".
A Palestinian bid to join the international body as a full member state in 2011 failed because of a lack of support at the UN Security Council.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20299149
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)What is Israel afraid of?
aranthus
(3,385 posts)A hostile military force encamped on the Judean Hills. Loss of water supplies. A Palestinian state needs to happen, but don't pretend that it's not a significant risk for Israel.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Oh, that's right. I'm not supposed to talk about that. It's alright for Israeli citizens to chip away at the Palestinian's land, but not alright for Palestinians to seek a homeland at the UN.
Israel has significant risks from its own citizens that it won't control.
I'm all for a demilitarized Palestinian state, whether they like it or not, that has UN patrols instead of IDF ones.
I'm also for all Israeli citizens to be moved off of Palestinian territory and back into Israeli territory; whether they like it or not.
aranthus
(3,385 posts)[font color=blue]I stated very clearly that a Palestinian state needs to happen, and you're going off as if I never wrote that.
We have very different views of what aparthied means. Don't want to get into a huge argument over it. As for the rest of what you have written, we actually agree on most of it.[/font]
"Israel has significant risks from its own citizens that it won't control." [font color=blue]Agreed.[/font]
"I'm all for a demilitarized Palestinian state, whether they like it or not, that has UN patrols instead of IDF ones." [font color=blue]I think that this is unrealistic, and could never be enforced.. Israel is just going to have to live with a fully sovereign Palestinian state, which means it will have weapons. And UN troops will only prevent violence as long as the two sides really want to prevent violence themselves. UN observers are of marginal use otherwise.[/font]
"I'm also for all Israeli citizens to be moved off of Palestinian territory and back into Israeli territory; whether they like it or not." [font color=blue]I think that this will have to happen. If the Palestinians actually want the Israelis to stay (which I doubt) then that would be fine by me. I think where we disagree is just what is Israeli and Palestinian territory. I think that has to be negotiated in good faith.[/font]
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)an apologist. My mistake.
King_David
(14,851 posts)An apologist for Hamas or an Apologist for Hamas' Terrorism against humanity ?
Probably they would eat pizza..Deservedly so ...
Your out if line.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)were uprooted and were forced to live inside Israel.
Imagine that.
If anybody is out of line is those who support illegals in the first place.
Key word: illegal.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Also, you just equated Israel with Hamas. Good going there, Dave.
King_David
(14,851 posts)Good going .
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)among other things and those doing the name calling walk away with out so much as a hidden post much less being PPRed
juries here are random and what one jury might hide another would not it all depends on who's chosen to be on them
King_David
(14,851 posts)Labeling Israel "The Apartheid state or entity" is all the rage from far left to far right nowdays ..
It's "in" and everyone's doing it.
... Israel the Apartheid State :
In Tel Aviv They put French Fries in their Shwarma...gross..Israel the Apartheid State
In the Knesset they have Coca Cola Machines not Pepsi ....Israel the Apartheid State
They have in supermarkets Milky and Milky afooch....Israel the Apartheid State
Pesach time the Bakeries sell Kosher Lepesach Bread Cakes and Bagels...Israel the Apartheid State
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)In lands belonged to Palestine, Illegal settlements grow
The olive groves when burnt do shine in weariness and woe.
King_David
(14,851 posts)As Shaktimaan proved you don't even know what the word means... Everything is apartheid to you... Even a walk on the Tayelet or a snack on Dizzingoff or a beer on Allenby or a walk on Hayarkon ...
It's all Apartheid to you ... And Greek to everyone else
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Firstly, you're ridicule of a serious situation is not funny. Secondly, you rhyme poorly. Thirdly, Shaktimaan proved nothing except that you are a fan. Fans are for American Idol.
So let's get back to those illegal settlements that you like to ignore.
Or do you want to throw more bad 3rd grade rhyme my way?
King_David
(14,851 posts)Apartheid apartheid .. It's the way we roll.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Israeli children cannot be jailed under the age of 14,
while Palestinian children as young as 12 have been held by Israel.
Israeli children must be given access to a lawyer within 48 hours,
whereas Palestinians can be held for three months without legal aid.
http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=534074
this under the same governing authority and nearly text book apartheid
King_David
(14,851 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)a new one, and Jordanian law holds sway in Area C and B too, gee I had been led to believe that Israel had juristidiction over every asspect of law in Area C and what would be considered security in Area B, well gosh darn it
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)aranthus
(3,385 posts)I realize the danger of encouraging the Palestinians to think that they could achieve a state without actually making peace with Israel. However, upping the Palestinians' status combined with a proper push from Washington might unstick negotiations. Also, I don't think it's worth the drop in our international status to withhold UN dues.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)now UNESCO was a minor and run up to the election move, this time it would not be quite so minor
http://www.justice.gov/ola/views-letters/112/102111-ltr-re-hr-2829-UN-transparency-accountability-reform-act-2011.pdf
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)And decided not to challenge it. No reason to expect it to do differently. Note also that the loss of funds was and remains a very big deal to UNESCO.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)however then it was just UNESCO this would be more all encompassing and could well endanger not just US but global security
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The executive branch can only spend what the legislative branch appropriates. The UNESCO money was reallocated to a different budget line. The House and/or Senate could easily do that to the UN funds, saying they were following the law. Legally the president could do nothing.
The president is right on this one. This level of brinksmanship is dumb. If the UN goes through with it, and he decides to fight the funding cuts, he will spend political capital much needed elsewhere. I am not sure he would fight for the UN funding under those circumstances.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)women's health, but when it comes to the budget there is this little thing called a veto ...........
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Not sure about the IAEA, but you can look through Federal budget lines if you like.
As for a veto threat, two things could happen...a combined appropriations bill or a single appropriation bill for the UN payments. The former would be laden with enough things the administration wants that it would be veto proof. The latter might never make his desk. There will also be a court challenge which the administration could well lose. The president is right, pushing the Palestinian issue at the UN at this time this is a bad idea if they want to retain US funding.
I do not believe that this administration would go to the mat for full UN funding. Its not a core issue for the US or the party. Too many other domestic issues it needs to win on and this one is not worth the political capital.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)political capital stopped being an issue 11/6/12 IMO
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)It will have to pick its battles. There will be a few easy wins early on, but hard issues will have to be worked. That is called using political capital. This administration has too much to do as it is. A fight over UN funding would be an unneeded distraction. Given that kind of choice, I expect to see some sort of end around so the administration is not put in a binary situation, which the repukes would love and use.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Congress can only can only stone wall domestic issues
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Without an appropriation, the executive branch has no money to spend. It can not willy-nilly take funds from one area and apply to another. Clear black letter law. The president can not simply ordered something funded.
Even if the courts agreed that the current law constrained the ability of the executive branch to run foreign affairs and declared it unconstitutional, the Hill would still have to fund it annually. For years the UN has complained that they wanted more money from the US, and for years, regardless of what the president wanted, it got what the Congress was willing to appropriate and no more.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)a different animal altogether
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The president has less influence than many believe. His budget is only the starting point and sometimes not even that.
I am retired from the Executive Branch...I lived this stuff daily for a long time.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)which part?
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)I was a camp follower for a while, and when we returned to the US rejoined civil service.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)which one and how did you get there?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)For the Palestinian people, I mean.
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)The real impact may be to the UN itself...still TBD
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)President Mahmoud Abbas Tuesday said that the Palestinian Authority is ready to resume negotiations with Israel the day after the vote on the resolution the PA will submit to the United Nations on November 29th.
During a joint press conference between Abbas and the Egyptian Foreign Minister Muhamed Amr, which was held following Abbas meeting with the Egyptian President Muhamad Morsi, Abbas said that PA is keen to continue consultations with the Egyptian leadership to coordinate and unite positions regarding a number of issues, such as the Palestinian bid to UN.
The Arab Foreign Ministers pledged to support the Palestinian cause by contacting world countries to vote in favor of the bid.
http://english.wafa.ps/index.php?action=detail&id=21057