Scowcroft, Brzezinski urge Iran accord By Jim Lobe
Also in Good ReadsWASHINGTON - Two pillars of the US foreign policy establishment urged Congress on Monday to forgo any new sanctions legislation directed against Iran, warning that it will risk "undermining or even shutting down" ongoing negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program.
In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, General Brent Scowcroft (retired), who served as national security adviser to Presidents Gerald Ford and George H W Bush, and Zbigniew Brzezinski, who served in the same post under President Jimmy Carter, said that an interim agreement with Iran - the focus of critical talks the next round of which is to begin Wednesday in Geneva - "would advance the national security of the United States, Israel, and other partners in the region".
"More sanctions now as these unprecedented negotiations are just getting underway would reconfirm Iranians in their belief that the US is not prepared to make any agreement with the current government of Iran," the two men wrote. "We call on all Americans and the US Congress to stand firmly with the President in the difficult but historic negotiations with Iran."
The letter, which was made available by the New York-based Iran Project, comes amidst an increasingly strident campaign by the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his supporters in the powerful Israel lobby here to oppose an interim accord that reportedly would permit Tehran to continue enriching uranium, albeit at a low level that would not lend itself to the production of a nuclear weapon.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MID-01-191113.html
= new reply since forum marked as read
The main question is whether a member of the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty should be treated as having violated that treaty, without having actually done so. It's a very important question, whether a treaty can be violated on the assumption that another party to the treaty might someday decide to violate it. if so, well, that certainly changes the entire dynamic of multinational treaties, doesn't it?
Granted, we're talking about the United States here, and... well, we have something of a record when it comes to respecting treaties....
Would this be the same report that your main man Nutty Yahoo has said he was "unimpressed" with?
The IAEA report lists areas of concern. That is, areas of Iran's nuclear program could be suspicious, and warrant more information or investigation into the matter.
Concern, suspicion, and guilt are three very different concepts, as I'm sure you understand. To treat the IAEA's concerns as rock-solid proof of Iran violating the NPT is an exercise in foolishness.
Basically until there is evidence that Iran has violated the NPT, then Iran is not in violation. That's how this works, Shira.
If Israel really wants a say in what's going on, maybe they could join the NPT. 
