Apartheid Is A Crime, Not An Analogy – OpEd
March 10, 2012
By Joe Catron
As Israeli Apartheid Week unfolds around the world, apologists for Israels crimes against the Palestinian people scramble to defend their chosen regimes system of racism, ethnic cleansing, and occupation, against the charge of apartheid.
The apartheid analogy is fatally flawed, the Jerusalem Connections Shelley Neese writes. The David Projects David Bernstein says, The apartheid analogy is specious and absurd. The Anti-Defamation League has even circulated an old report: The Apartheid Analogy: Wrong for Israel.
These commentators are right, but not for the reasons they claim. An apartheid analogy is fatally flawed, specious, absurd, and wrong for Israel because apartheid is not an analogy, but a crime as well-defined in law as embezzlement or kidnapping.
The most relevant statute, the 1973 International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, perhaps muddies the waters by stating that the term the crime of apartheid
shall include similar practices of racial segregation and discrimination as practiced in southern Africa.
MORE...
http://www.eurasiareview.com/10032012-apartheid-is-a-crime-not-an-analogy-oped/