Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT
Related: About this forumLawsuit Claims A Transgender Girl Is Ruining Her Classmates’ Lives By Peeing
Last year, Illinois District 211 fought hard to maintain discrimination against a transgender girl (identified only as Student A) who simply wanted access to the same facilities as other girls. Eventually, the district agreed to comply with the Department of Educations mandate that the student be accommodated. Now, though, a group of conservative parents and students (and their conservative lawyers) have filed a federal suit to challenge those accommodations.
A group of 51 families (73 parents and 63 students most of whom have maintained anonymity), represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and Thomas More Society, claim that allowing Student A access to locker rooms harms their kids rights by infringing on their privacy. The families even call themselves Students and Parents for Privacy. The way the suit reads, these students lives and educational experiences have been devastated by the stress of having to coexist with a transgender classmate.
The suit describes multiple forms of trauma these girls have apparently experienced knowing a transgender student might be in the restroom, including anxiety, fear, fright, apprehension, humiliation, intimidation, degradation, stress, embarrassment, discomfort, and loss of dignity.
But what this suit is really about is rejecting transgender people. These families claim they have a right to disregard who Student A is, and they claim that they are victims simply because she is going about her life. The complaint is long and detailed, which makes it easy to reveal these motivations.
A group of 51 families (73 parents and 63 students most of whom have maintained anonymity), represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and Thomas More Society, claim that allowing Student A access to locker rooms harms their kids rights by infringing on their privacy. The families even call themselves Students and Parents for Privacy. The way the suit reads, these students lives and educational experiences have been devastated by the stress of having to coexist with a transgender classmate.
The suit describes multiple forms of trauma these girls have apparently experienced knowing a transgender student might be in the restroom, including anxiety, fear, fright, apprehension, humiliation, intimidation, degradation, stress, embarrassment, discomfort, and loss of dignity.
But what this suit is really about is rejecting transgender people. These families claim they have a right to disregard who Student A is, and they claim that they are victims simply because she is going about her life. The complaint is long and detailed, which makes it easy to reveal these motivations.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2016/05/06/3775767/illinois-transgender-student-lawsuit/?utm_content=bufferebbce&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1188 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawsuit Claims A Transgender Girl Is Ruining Her Classmates’ Lives By Peeing (Original Post)
icymist
May 2016
OP
I have never, ever been in a women's bathroom that didn't have either stalls or a single occupancy.
patricia92243
May 2016
#1
Funny how these girls can see that separate but not equal doesn't work with them but not anyone else
LostOne4Ever
May 2016
#2
patricia92243
(12,595 posts)1. I have never, ever been in a women's bathroom that didn't have either stalls or a single occupancy.
Someone could wave their penis around all day - and no one would see them. The problem simply DOES NOT exist.
I guess some people think that transgender people have suddenly appeared. There have always been and always will be transgender people. It has just been in the news - that is all that is different.
LostOne4Ever
(9,288 posts)2. Funny how these girls can see that separate but not equal doesn't work with them but not anyone else
[font style="font-family:'Georgia','Baskerville Old Face','Helvetica',fantasy;" size=4 color=#009999]And they are being bullied by not being allowed to bully the transgirl and being called out for the bigots that they are?
That not bullying, that is calling a spade a spade. I have no more sympathy for them than for any other bigots. None. [/font]