HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Gender & Orientation » LGBT (Group) » Argument analysis: Justic...

Tue May 12, 2020, 05:01 AM

Argument analysis: Justices divided in debate over "ministerial exception"

Argument analysis: Justices divided in debate over “ministerial exception”
By Amy Howe on May 11, 2020 at 6:41 pm

This morning the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a pair of cases filed by two teachers in southern California, who sued the Catholic schools where they worked after they learned that their contracts wouldn’t be renewed. The Catholic schools have urged the courts to throw out the teachers’ cases, relying on a doctrine known as the “ministerial exception,” which bars ministers from suing churches and other religious institutions for employment discrimination. In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that the exception prohibited a lawsuit filed by a teacher at a Lutheran school who was also an ordained minister, but it expressly declined to provide a formula for courts to use to determine whether other employees qualify as ministers in future cases. The 2012 ruling was unanimous, but after over an hour and a half of oral argument today, it appeared less likely that the justices’ eventual decision in today’s cases would be.

{snip}

1 replies, 589 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 1 replies Author Time Post
Reply Argument analysis: Justices divided in debate over "ministerial exception" (Original post)
mahatmakanejeeves May 2020 OP
abqtommy May 2020 #1

Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 08:18 AM

1. I'm gonna be watching what's going on with The Court at this time. Then we'll know if we

have to pack the court after we win...or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread