Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,596 posts)
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:45 PM Feb 2015

Why femicide won’t end until we have a truly equal society

Why femicide won’t end until we have a truly equal society

The new census listing women killed by men aims to shed light on a dark subject. But femicide will not stop until we change the culture that supports it


Making a stand: hundreds of pairs red shoes in Palermo, representing the many victims of femicide. Photograph: Antonio Melita/Demotix/Corbis

Last week saw the launch of the Femicide Census, a list of murdered women that digs down into the internet like a terrible well. It was reported at length in this paper, in a piece that detailed what has changed since Karen Ingala Smith first started counting dead women in 2012, and contained tributes to some of the victims, pictured smiling and beautiful, looking off to the side of the photos, shy.

. . . . .

Patterns are already clear. There were more than 64,000 sexual offences recorded by police last year, Ingala Smith tells me, and 1.4 million domestic violence assaults against women. “When men kill women,” she wants to stress, “they are doing so in the context of a society in which men’s violence against women is entrenched and systemic. When misogyny, sexism and the objectification of women are so pervasive that they are all but inescapable, can a man killing a women ever not be a sexist act?”

An aside: since the launch, reports of the census have inevitably been pissed on with the question: “What about the men?” Like the commenter’s cliché “Not all men”, it’s a question noisily applied to derail feminist arguments, and sometimes it is worth answering and sometimes, well, no. This time, the what-about-the-menners are claiming that in concentrating solely on female victims the census is itself sexist. But when men kill their partners they have usually been abusing them for years. When women kill, they themselves have usually been abused. In the decade up to 2012, 93.9% of adults who were convicted of murder were men. So.

There is still a long way to go. Notably absent from the census are any details of the victims of abuse who kill themselves. Just as Ingala Smith took on that forbidding task in 2012, after suffering abuse herself Karen Blatchford (at the Twitter account @10womenaweek) is now attempting to collate suicidal women. Earlier this month 23-year-old Kylie Payne, who said she’d been raped by a fellow patient, was found hanging in a mental health unit. At the end of January, after 22-year-old Anita Kubicka left a suicide note on her voicemail, an inquest heard that her family believed her boyfriend had been monitoring her phone.

. . . .
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/feb/22/femicide-census-equality-eva-wiseman

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Women's Rights & Issues»Why femicide won’t end un...