Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Health
Related: About this forumU.S. judge finds that Aetna misled the public about its reasons for quitting Obamacare
Last edited Mon Jan 23, 2017, 10:15 PM - Edit history (1)
Related thread: Judge Blocks Aetnas $37 Billion Deal for Humana.
___________________________________________________________________________
Source: Los Angeles Times
U.S. judge finds that Aetna misled the public about its reasons for quitting Obamacare
By Michael Hiltzik
JANUARY 23, 2017, 12:00 PM
Aetna claimed this summer that it was pulling out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing Obamacare individual insurance because of a business decision it was simply losing too much money on the Obamacare exchanges.
Now a federal judge has ruled that that was a rank falsehood. In fact, says Judge John D. Bates, Aetna made its decision at least partially in response to a federal antitrust lawsuit blocking its proposed $37-billion merger with Humana. Aetna threatened federal officials with the pullout before the lawsuit was filed, and followed through on its threat once it was filed. Bates made the observations in the course of a ruling he issued Monday blocking the merger.
Aetna executives had moved heaven and earth to conceal their decision-making process from the court, in part by discussing the matter on the phone rather than in emails, and by shielding what did get put in writing with the cloak of attorney-client privilege, a practice Bates found came close to malfeasance.
The judges conclusions about Aetnas real reasons for pulling out of Obamacare as opposed to the rationalization the company made in public are crucial for the debate over the fate of the Affordable Care Act. Thats because the companys withdrawal has been exploited by Republicans to justify repealing the act. Just last week, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) cited Aetnas action on the Charlie Rose show, saying that it proved how shaky the exchanges were.
Bates found that this rationalization was largely untrue. ...
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By Michael Hiltzik
JANUARY 23, 2017, 12:00 PM
Aetna claimed this summer that it was pulling out of all but four of the 15 states where it was providing Obamacare individual insurance because of a business decision it was simply losing too much money on the Obamacare exchanges.
Now a federal judge has ruled that that was a rank falsehood. In fact, says Judge John D. Bates, Aetna made its decision at least partially in response to a federal antitrust lawsuit blocking its proposed $37-billion merger with Humana. Aetna threatened federal officials with the pullout before the lawsuit was filed, and followed through on its threat once it was filed. Bates made the observations in the course of a ruling he issued Monday blocking the merger.
Aetna executives had moved heaven and earth to conceal their decision-making process from the court, in part by discussing the matter on the phone rather than in emails, and by shielding what did get put in writing with the cloak of attorney-client privilege, a practice Bates found came close to malfeasance.
The judges conclusions about Aetnas real reasons for pulling out of Obamacare as opposed to the rationalization the company made in public are crucial for the debate over the fate of the Affordable Care Act. Thats because the companys withdrawal has been exploited by Republicans to justify repealing the act. Just last week, House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) cited Aetnas action on the Charlie Rose show, saying that it proved how shaky the exchanges were.
Bates found that this rationalization was largely untrue. ...
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-aetna-obamacare-20170123-story.html
___________________________________________________________________________
Related: United States of America v. Aetna ruling
EDIT: The judge's findings about the ACA exchanges start around page 134 of the ruling.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. judge finds that Aetna misled the public about its reasons for quitting Obamacare (Original Post)
Eugene
Jan 2017
OP
orwell
(8,003 posts)1. Add another floor...
...to the RepubliCon tower of Bullshit!
bpositive
(425 posts)2. Hope karma bites them in the ass
rgbecker
(4,890 posts)3. Read this. Shows just how these corporate bastards work.
We're going to need a revolution.
DK504
(3,847 posts)4. And yet another merger
I guess Comey's getting paid off well for his treason. How many mega-corps do we have left? How few companies own America?
lark
(26,081 posts)5. Hahahahahahaha!
Judge not buying Aetna's lies and threats - Excellent! Wonder if Drumpf bribed Aetna to do this (using Russian rubles, no doubt).