Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,262 posts)
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 05:53 PM Jul 2012

How a movie changed one man’s vision forever (BBC) {stereoblindness cured}

By Morgen Peck

Good movies change people’s view of the world all the time, but how many can say a movie has fundamentally altered their vision forever? One person who can is Bruce Bridgeman. In terms of how he sees the world, there is life before Hugo, and life after Hugo.

On 16 February this year, Bridgeman went to the theatre with his wife to see Martin Scorsese’s 3D family adventure. Like everyone else, he paid a surcharge for a pair of glasses, despite thinking they would be a complete waste of money. Bridgeman, a 67-year-old neuroscientist at the University of California in Santa Cruz, grew up nearly stereoblind, that is, without true perception of depth. “When we’d go out and people would look up and start discussing some bird in the tree, I would still be looking for the bird when they were finished,” he says. “For everybody else, the bird jumped out. But to me, it was just part of the background.”

All that changed when the lights went down and the previews finished. Almost as soon as he began to watch the film, the characters leapt from the screen in a way he had never experienced. “It was just literally like a whole new dimension of sight. Exciting,” says Bridgeman.

But this wasn’t just movie magic. When he stepped out of the cinema, the world looked different. For the first time, Bridgeman saw a lamppost standing out from the background. Trees, cars and people looked more alive and more vivid than ever. And, remarkably, he’s seen the world in 3D ever since that day. “Riding to work on my bike, I look into a forest beside the road and see a riot of depth, every tree standing out from all the others,” he says. Something had happened. Some part of his brain had awakened.

Conventional wisdom says that what happened to Bridgeman is impossible. Like many of the 5-10% of the population living with stereoblindness, he was resigned to seeing a world without depth. What Bridgeman experienced in the theatre has been observed in clinics previously – the most famous case being Sue Barry, or “Stereo Sue”, who according to the author and neurologist Oliver Sacks first experienced stereovision while she was undergoing vision therapy. Her visual epiphany came during the course of professional therapy in her late-forties. The question is why after several decades of living in a flat, two-dimensional world did Bridgeman’s brain spontaneously begin to process 3D images?
***
more: http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20120719-awoken-from-a-2d-world




This is a topic of personal interest to me -- I lost my stereovision in grad school, which made it almost impossible to do lab work. It took a long time before my condition was properly diagnosed, as it had come on incrementally, rather than suddenly. It took not one, but two, dedicated doctors to correctly diagnose and treat my condition. I can't imagine how difficult my life would have been without this treatment.

I recently read Sue Barry's "Fixing My Gaze", which taught me a lot beyond my own personal experience. She had been stereoblind nearly since birth, and was cured of the condition late in life, which many doctors said was impossible. A neurologist, she was able to discuss her own therapy with insight from her own professional training.

Even if you think you aren't affected by this, it is something worth knowing about. Some "slow readers" may actually be suffering from an inability to focus both eyes simultaneously on the material they are reading. Be sure your children's eyes are checked for proper stereo vision when you take them for their eye exams -- it is much easier to treat difficulties at a young age, and the benefit of correcting them is tremendous.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How a movie changed one man’s vision forever (BBC) {stereoblindness cured} (Original Post) eppur_se_muova Jul 2012 OP
So interesting Celebration Jul 2012 #1
I haven't seen a movie in years ... eppur_se_muova Jul 2012 #2
Is your condition related to "Lazy Eye" or Amblyopia? nt flamingdem Jul 2012 #3
My doctor called it "exophoria", meaning 'turning out'. eppur_se_muova Jul 2012 #4

Celebration

(15,812 posts)
1. So interesting
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 08:37 AM
Jul 2012

Thanks for this!

And, so, have you seen Hugo with stereo glasses? It's a great movie, one of my faves.

What was your therapy? Various eye exercises?

eppur_se_muova

(36,262 posts)
2. I haven't seen a movie in years ...
Fri Jul 20, 2012, 01:48 PM
Jul 2012

ironically, one of the signs I was having problems (though I didn't realize it at the time) came when I went to see an old 50's 3D movie. I had to watch the movie for a long time -- say half an hour? -- before the 3D effect worked for me. That was a sign my binocular vision was failing, but I didn't realize it.

The main therapy consisted of viewing red/green or polarized anaglyphs (trademarked as Tranaglyphs ™), while the therapist adjusted the separation between them. Since my left eye was turning outward, at first I could only fuse the two images when they were widely separated. With repeated exercises, over several weeks, I was finally able to fuse the images at normal separation. After each session, I could tell that my vision was taking on a little added depth -- and an hour or two later I would get a real hammer-between-the-eyes headache. After the whole therapy sequence was finished, it still took some time to re-adapt to full binocular vision, and my eyes tended to tire easily.

A big prerequisite to successful therapy, in my case, was having my lens prescription reduced by a doctor who was very careful not to over-prescribe the lens strength. Many ophthalmologists tend to over prescribe, and if you are young and nearsighted, your eyes will adapt to the overcorrection. Over a period of many years, I had accumulated quite a lot of overcorrection in one eye, causing that eye to suffer so much fatigue that it would stop focusing properly and my brain would simply suppress the image from that eye. It was a real shock to discover one day that I could cover my left eye and leave my vision almost unaffected -- the image from that eye was not being processed much at all. Some doctors routinely check for overcorrection, others -- not so much.

Sue Barry's book describes some of the other treatments used. She had been stereoblind her whole life, unlike me, so her doctor started her off with more basic therapy than I needed. I thought the bead-on-two-strings would have been a good home exercise for me, but I didn't learn about it until after I no longer needed therapy.

Surprisingly, it is not ophthalmologists, but optometrists who are the leaders in diagnosing and treating problems with stereovision, especially in children. See http://www.covd.org and http://optometrists.org/public_eye_care.html

flamingdem

(39,313 posts)
3. Is your condition related to "Lazy Eye" or Amblyopia? nt
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jul 2012

Amblyopia, or "lazy eye," is the loss of one eye's ability to see details. It is the most common cause of vision problems in children. Symptoms: Eyes that turn in or out; Eyes that do not appear to work together

eppur_se_muova

(36,262 posts)
4. My doctor called it "exophoria", meaning 'turning out'.
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jul 2012

My left eye turned outward by about 7 degrees when relaxed. A literal reading of amblyopia is "wandering eye", which suggests loss of control of the eye muscles, and may differ from exophoria only by degree. I'm not sure; medical terms are not always as precise as we'd like to believe, and definitions do change over time, or even from one doctor to another, sometimes reflecting different philosophies.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»How a movie changed one m...