Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
Mon Jun 20, 2016, 08:53 PM Jun 2016

(Mental Health Support Grp) I asked for the following clarification re new "insensitivity" guideline

subject line: Could you please clarify whether new guideline for insensitivity covers persons with mental disorders



The term disability is somewhat nebulous regarding mental disorders. The ADA considers some mental disorders as disabilities and some not. So the coverage of the term disability can't be assumed to include stigmatizing language about mental disorders or persons with mental disorders.

The English speaking psych industry, both in NA and in the Commonwealth of Nations, recognizes insensitivity of language around mental disorders as a significant promotor of prejudice and serious consequent discrimination.

When a writer demeans one class of people using labels that reference as icons, models, or examples of what is bad, that writer manifests that he or she is better than the third class. This is foundational to the offensive, ergo insensitive, practice of ableism, in which ill people are stereotyped as being somehow less valuable and deserving of consideration than well people.

Such insensitivity underlies all bigotry which DU's new guideline seems to recognize for other categories named in the guidelines.

Because of such consequences the AP Style Guide states that references to mental disorder should only be used when actual mental disorders are discussed. Furthermore, use of language that infers a person in the news has a mental illness should only be made when a diagnosis has been suggested by a capable trained professional. The AP Style Guide is considered a standard of the communications industry.

Which is to say reasonable professionals believe insensitive language is harmful to it's targets (whose occurrence on DU is likely near the national average of 20-25 percent) and debasing of it's users.

Because there is ambiguity surrounding mental disorders as disabilities and ambiguity about terms of stigmatizing language as insensitive, if not harmful, I would appreciate a clarification.


Thank-you for your concern.

JM

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
(Mental Health Support Grp) I asked for the following clarification re new "insensitivity" guideline (Original Post) HereSince1628 Jun 2016 OP
hear hear mopinko Jun 2016 #1
Yes, at least it appeared to be a successful posting HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #2
please post a link if you get a reply. mopinko Jun 2016 #3
Yes, that was my intent. HereSince1628 Jun 2016 #4
I'm not innocent here. hunter Jun 2016 #5

hunter

(38,264 posts)
5. I'm not innocent here.
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 01:24 AM
Jun 2016

"Off his meds" Hunter is not always a nice person.

I rely heavily on support systems of family and friends and community I build for myself when I'm stable.

I've not felt especially stable this year. "Third person" OCD Hunter usually intervenes after too many nights trying to sleep amidst the nightmares. OCD hunter has been running the show quite a bit lately. My apologies if I've avoided anyone.

Doesn't help that my little brother's been recently hospitalized for worse shit.



Thank you HereSince1628 for bringing up this issue.


Latest Discussions»Support Forums»Mental Health Support»(Mental Health Support Gr...