A Nation Without the Hyde Amendment Will Be Safer and More Humane for All of Us
A Nation Without the Hyde Amendment Will Be Safer and More Humane for All of Us
9/29/2022 by Sung Yeon Choimorrow
Abortion, like all healthcare, should be a human right—not merely a benefit of select insurance plans.
An abortion rights demonstrator in front of the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2022, a day after the Supreme Court released a decision on Dobbs v. .Jackson Women’s Health Organization, striking down the right to abortion. (Stefani Reynolds / AFP via Getty Images)
Over four decades ago, millions of people woke up without abortion care. On Sept. 30, 1976, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Hyde Amendment, which barred federal funds from covering abortions with the narrowest exceptions for rape, incest or threats to a patient’s life. As soon as Hyde went into effect, the number of Medicaid-covered abortions in the United States dropped from 300,000 to just a few thousand. Today, the Hyde Amendment limits abortion coverage for many of the 31 million women on Medicaid and those covered by the Indian Health Service and Children’s Health Insurance Program. When added to the Americans trapped in programs that have adopted the amendment’s language—including recipients of military and federal benefits—the number of people the Hyde Amendment has barred from full healthcare is incalculable.
Like many abortion restrictions, this hurts women of color most. Black and Latina women are most likely to be covered by Medicaid and struggle to access abortion services. For many Native Americans, the Hyde Amendment prohibited the protections of Roe v. Wade, before it was overturned, from ever reaching their doctors’ offices. And as an Asian American woman in the reproductive justice movement, I’ve seen the Hyde Amendment reshape life for countless Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) families. Yet conversations about the Hyde Amendment often overlook AAPI communities. For us, statistics continue to paint an incomplete picture, even though as many as one-third of pregnancies in the AAPI community end in abortion. Less than 10 percent of Asian Americans as a whole are enrolled in Medicaid—but over 30 percent of Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders and 20 percent of Southeast Asians, including Vietnamese, Laotian, Hmong, and Cambodian Americans, rely on the program.
As a result, these groups must scale higher barriers to access abortion—denied first by insurance, and second by the staggering costs of abortion care. An abortion can cost anywhere from $500 to over $3,000, depending on the timing and type of procedure. That’s before adding the additional costs of childcare, taking time off work or losing a job, and traveling across state lines to bypass draconian abortion restrictions in your home state. For many, these costs lead to the end of reproductive freedom. Nearly half of Southeast Asian Americans are low-income, while 15 percent of Native Hawaiians in the United States live at the federal poverty level. Together, over 1.3 million Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander women live in states that have banned or are likely to enact abortion bans.
. . . . .
At the same time, organizations that serve AAPI communities must continue to gather accurate and comprehensive data on abortion—from those who use abortion care as well as those who are denied it. The AAPI community is far from monolithic and only by illuminating the diversity of the AAPI community can we develop an accurate understanding of abortion care—and of the actions needed to safeguard it. By repealing the Hyde Amendment, we can move toward a better quality of care for vulnerable populations, and for everyone who may need an abortion. A nation without Hyde will be a safer, more humane home for all of us—from working mothers to young students, immigrants to third-generation, and every person who cares for their health and hopes to create their own destinies.
https://msmagazine.com/2022/09/29/hyde-amendment-abortion/
= new reply since forum marked as read
What I don't get is, why do they get to dictate what any of their tax money is spent on when no one else does? Sure, there are avenues open to all of us: voting for pro-choice candidates, donating to their campaigns and working to help get them elected. But nowhere else that I know of is there a line item veto like this for a specific thing that some people object to.
When my taxes were used to fight a bogus war in Iraq, I didn't have any say in the matter. Same thing with Vietnam (although most of that took place before I was of voting age or paying much in the way of taxes). It didn't matter that I objected to the killing in those and other places. Forced birthers who don't want to pay for abortion care (because they consider that "killing" despite what the rest of us think) should not get to dictate what the government does in this area, either.
Grrr, this makes me so mad! 
If they want to scream about "killing babies," I can show them pictures of actual babies and children who were killed in wars paid for by my tax dollars and yours and theirs. The most famous one I know of, from Vietnam, was made into a poster that many carried in protests against the Vietnam war. It shows a pile of small bodies with the caption "And babies? And babies." I won't post it here because it's very disturbing and I don't want to smack people in the face with it, but anyone who is curious (and has a strong stomach) can see it and read about it here: https://www.redlineartworks.org/section652294_311497.html
I first saw it at a street protest, but I personally find it harder to look at something like that on a computer screen, where it's right up in my face. If you decide to go look, don't say I didn't warn you.
When American tax dollars are spent on useless wars, nobody gets to opt out of having their money spent on them. But the rest of us are supposed to be okay with a law like the Hyde amendment that prevents needy Americans from being able to access needed health care? Hell, no! This law needs to go, immediately if not sooner.
