Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gardening

MichaelSoE

(1,576 posts) Wed Jun 22, 2022, 08:42 AM Jun 2022

Lubber Grasshopper on Red Sunflower

People hate them (Lubbers) as they have voracious appetites and can decimate an ornamental in hours.
I don't mind them (eat and let eat, eh) and the colors are just incredible.

Cross posted in the Photography Group

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lubber Grasshopper on Red Sunflower (Original Post) MichaelSoE Jun 2022 OP

Just. . .WOW. Thank you so much. niyad Jun 2022 #1

Thank you. FeelingBlue Jun 2022 #2

Gorgeous photo. nt Jade Fox Jun 2022 #3

We are all food. We are all eaters. TygrBright Jun 2022 #4

niyad

(113,265 posts)

1. Just. . .WOW. Thank you so much.

Reply to MichaelSoE (Original post)

Wed Jun 22, 2022, 08:42 AM

Jun 2022

FeelingBlue

(677 posts)

2. Thank you.

Reply to MichaelSoE (Original post)

Wed Jun 22, 2022, 08:57 AM

Jun 2022

While our eyes are glued to the Petrie Dish of Slime that is the Republican Party, there’s a whole beautiful world of nature out there that we can forget about. Let’s smell the roses and watch the grasshoppers, too!!

Jade Fox

(10,030 posts)

3. Gorgeous photo. nt

Reply to MichaelSoE (Original post)

Wed Jun 22, 2022, 09:50 AM

Jun 2022

TygrBright

(20,758 posts)

4. We are all food. We are all eaters.

Reply to MichaelSoE (Original post)

Wed Jun 22, 2022, 11:07 AM

Jun 2022

That said, one or two grasshoppers are welcome. Dozens is when I start taking Louis B. Mayhem on foraging expeditions in the garden. Louie calls them "Kitty Klondikes" after the delicious ice cream treat hiz Mom enjoys so much.

appreciatively,
Bright

Reply to this discussion