Federal Medical Marijuana Bill a Mixed Bag

[Ruby the Liberal]

For copyright adherence, I skipped the good and am just quoting the concerns. I have been railing about rescheduling for eons to allow for more extensive studies, but this brings up a point I hadn't considered. For those interested in the topic, this article is a great read.

[snip]

But unfortunately, changing the status in CSA may bring more problems than solutions.

The states have regulated cannabis without any federal oversight whatsoever. Agencies like the DEA, FDA, Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and National Institute of Health (NIH) have been unable to impose extra rules or influence local regulations.

Move cannabis down in the schedule scheme, even one notch, and all the agencies listed above would suddenly have tremendous power over every aspect of the plant. The acronyms would come with their own armies of lawyers and lobbyists well honed in the realm of big medicine, pharma and government.

Moving marijuana to Schedule II may actually undo the state-level marijuana reform laws by putting the federal government back in the driver's seat. Alcohol and tobacco are not in the CSA. No Schedule II drugs (which include cocaine and Oxycontin) are legally sold for recreation.

[snip]

Of course, there is another option, one that could (and should) still be considered. In order for federalism to truly prevail marijuana should be completely removed from the Controlled Substances Act.

This, please.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/columnists/philly420/1st_medical_marijuana_bill_introduced_in_US_Senate.html#p75fEYKkRufiH46R.99

[Cassidy1]

1. So should states enforce this?

Should the states enforce the rules?