Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumCan one person be a threat?
Simple questions
Is one person capable of being a threat worth protecting yourself from?
Do you need two or more attackers before resorting to armed force to protect your family or being?
11 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes: One determined attacker can be a threat. | |
11 (100%) |
|
No: One attacker could never pose a serious danger. | |
0 (0%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |

Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)
ileus
(15,396 posts)Inside your home...
No strawman I was told in another thread one person wasn't a threat.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Jenoch
(7,720 posts)so that we can read the reference in context?
Cho, Loughner, Holmes, and most others guilty of mass shootings were loners and committed their dastardly deeds alone.
ileus
(15,396 posts)CokeMachine
(1,018 posts)Don't expect a lot from that one. Single track (minds) cause a lot of bramage.
For the Jury
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)petronius
(26,677 posts)If not, then one person can certainly be a threat. (Especially if that one person is you-know-who...)
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)That should be all the answer needed...
CokeMachine
(1,018 posts)I'm 5'7", 235, fake hip and train tracks (scars) from sternum to pisser (penis) is all the reason I need. The Pomeranian doesn't help much but keeps my feet warm and makes me laugh.
Take Care, Lizzie
Response to ileus (Original post)
Robb This message was self-deleted by its author.
How many police and FBI and other agency personnel where after a single person in Boston last Friday?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,615 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)
CokeMachine
(1,018 posts)He needs better floss