Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumAn anti-gun poster shows a complete cartridge being fired. Again.
So not only is this gun shooting a complete cartridge, but the finger on the trigger has returned to its non-firing original position only milliseconds after the
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
Jgarrick
(521 posts)The poster implies that pro-gun activists are potential child killers.
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)aid and abets the killing of those children?
lastlib
(23,377 posts)Certainly your buds in Georgia and other states are removing the barriers. I would definitely call it enabling.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Please supply a QUANTITY for the first blank and a LEVEL OF RESTRICTION for the second blank.
villager
(26,001 posts)...the inevitable car wreck comes.
The bodies, for the proliferationists, are just acceptable collateral damage.
Warpy
(111,456 posts)and let the kids kill each other.
And you're trying to nitpick the art to death to make sure everybody misses that point.
Fact: kids are dying at a pretty good clip out there because adults in the house are stupid about their guns.
And that's what you're trying to nitpick away.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)It says "We fear you'll take our children."
It's not speaking of a four-year-old shooting his sister. It's equating pro-gun activists (the "you" of the first sentence) with child killers (the "you" of the second sentence).
Which makes it a vile, despicable message while also being graphically inept. Quite the achievement.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)lastlib
(23,377 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Both constitute "false equivalency."
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)"I love my children, therefore YOU can't have anything that might hurt them, even if you keep it in a safe or locked up. Because I'm a mom. With children."
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)In the case of gun control advocacy, being clueless about how guns work might or might not be relevant. If the advocacy is for something like universal background checks or better enforcement against straw purchasers, an advocate's ignorance about firearms technology isn't really germane. However, a lot of gun control proposals target specific features of firearms. It obviously behooves advocates of that sort of measure to know what they're talking about.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Goes on the other end from the round thingy with a hole in the end.
melm00se
(4,998 posts)What I would say is that the creator of the ad lacks the attention to detail which immediately calls into question their attention to other details (like the ones that may, or may not, support their case).
rrneck
(17,671 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)was that the "point" they were "missing" because how a gun looks when it shoots is not the message I took from that ad.
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)Or more precisely, the lack thereof. It's very pertinent when much of the legislation that the prohibitionists would like to enact has to do hardware -- a topic about which they apparently know next to nothing.
Oh yes, and the "gun owners = child killers" meme is patently offensive and guaranteed to confirm gun owners of all persuasions in their opposition to any kind of regulatory compromises.
Can you say "culture war"? I knew that you could.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)reflect precisely reality.....
Did I call anyone a "child killer"?
Can you say "hyperbolic"? There....I knew that you could....
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)reflect precisely reality.....
Ignorance is ignorance. Public displays of it tend to negatively affect credibility. It's really that simple.
No, you didn't. However, the poster clearly does equate gun-rights advocates with child killers. The "you" in both sentences does that, plainly.
I can say it all day long, but it does not apply. I merely stated a fact. Don't tell me you are going to try to deny the above equivalence as established in the poster. That would be an insult to both of our intelligences.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)normal person? I hate to think of your feelings on the Gieco gecko! Don't tell me....you think the E-trade baby is really trading stocks too!
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)... as Ronald McDonald and the Geico gecko, I'm right there with you.
Cartoonish bullshit is cartoonish bullshit, no matter what it's peddling.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and that Geico....sure is going bankrupt because of that lizard.
Who pays attention to THOSE guys....
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)... that Micky D's is the place to eat? And you buy your insurance from Geico because the lizard has a cute accent?
Please don't tell me that your political choices are similarly motivated. Please.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Please tell me that YOUR political choices are better than your apparent love for guns....You do realize that Common Sense Gun Regulations ARE a part of the Democratic Platform right?
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)My belief in the right to keep and bear arms is one aspect of my political choices. My political choices are not driven by clowns, talking animals, or propaganda posters.
Yes. Where I believe you and I may differ is in what constitutes "common sense."
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)advertising how?
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)What exactly is creative about technical inaccuracy? How does it enhance the message?
You're just making excuses for stupidity.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)it has nothing to do with accuracy....Do you still believe in Santa Claus? Because you know he was really just a marketing gimmick...
What do you have against Mickey Mouse? Are mice really 7 feet tall like they are at Disneyland? Do they wear clothes like Mickey does (after he got a little older anyways).
Its marketing....its all marketing
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)has been the use of humor and fun. Tell me what about that graphic (again, not advertising) is funny or fun?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)like I said before....then do you expect those that oppose gun ownership to just do "accurate depictions" of the horrible things guns do to the human body? Would you prefer that? Because that would also be "accurate" wouldn't it?
No you prefer them to be an advertisement FOR guns! And this is NOT that quite the opposite....they are selling what guns can do....therefore the gun doesn't NEED to be accurate....its not the gun that they are trying to sell!
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)I don't really care what that organization does in their graphics. Why do you seem to care so much that the inaccuracies are being pointed out?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)None that's what....the gun nor the "projectile" need to be accurate....its the DEAD part they are trying to sell.
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)How does a technically inaccurate picture capture the attention better than a technically accurate one? Again, you're just making excuses for an illustrator who was too ignorant and lazy to get the details right.
Mickey Mouse? When did I ever say anything about Mickey Mouse. You are very confused.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)was it a literal representation of a man in their advertisements selling hamburgers or not?...
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)What was the point you are attempting to make?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)or you would get it....
My point is that in advertising.....creative license is regularly taken..nuff said.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)It is propaganda.
petronius
(26,613 posts)this was a first draft. Wonder how many milliseconds it took between pressing 'Post' and the "Oh, damn!!!"
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)Look, I'm not anti-gun but picking holes in a photoshopped image is the equivelent of dismissing Shakespeare for typos i.e. completely missing the point.
villager
(26,001 posts)in.
They learned it at the propagandistic knees of their NRA forebears.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)point of this thread is to point out the fallacy of the reality in the image produced by those who wish to attack the U.S. Constitution?
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)in the poster's text; but what dignity that slur has is further undermined by a fart-in-church technical error. Poster art visuals are the story: a blunder in the focal point ain't no misspellin.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)Buy the propaganda anyways. ..not from the nra or the prohibtionists...
Most americans are somewhere in the middle.
And the hammer is wrong, too. Lol
mokawanis
(4,455 posts)They've done it twice??? Man, that's outrageous! What if it catches on and other people start using unrealistic images in ads? I mean, it's only the anti-gun crowd that does that, right?
Forget about all the pictures of food in ads, you wouldn't want to actually eat it because it has paint and lacquer on it, or it's actually raw, etc. Also, forget about the message because the picture is inaccurate. Or, or, or...
ileus
(15,396 posts)Is this even real? Or is there some new spelling for multiple children?
SevenSixtyTwo
(255 posts)out of trouble, out of gangs and out of my house at 2am and you'll have nothing to worry about.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)I imagine you also point out the inaccuracies of Elmer Fudd's shotgun loudly in front of children.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)cartoon? Far be it from me to disagree...!
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)Maybe they will wise up afer a while but for now it seems that the desire create some type of emotional reaction is overiding any desire or need for technical accuracy.
Can't wait to see the kinds legislative proposals that this type of willing departure from reality spawns.
Jgarrick
(521 posts)on emotion.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/04/can-50-million-buy-michael-bloomberg-gun-control/
Moms are afraid our children will be taken away and in the end, I think thats the emotion that will win the debate."
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 25, 2014, 05:04 AM - Edit history (1)
When one of your main talking points is focused on someones penis I'd say you are arguing from a weak position.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Two sides can play that game:
sarisataka
(18,924 posts)that the implication is that any gun owner is out to kill childrren.
Nor do I miss the either/or paradigm that it is painting the issue; of course no one is actually talking about banning anything beyond "reasonable" bans...
Skeeter Barnes
(994 posts)And the shooter should always follow through, so to speak, and hold the trigger back after firing while the gun is recoiling. Phenomenal recoil control on the part of this shooter, though. One handed, too!
clffrdjk
(905 posts)This one is accurate enough for me.
That is not a cartridge. That is a bullet that has been photo shopped to show forward motion.
The trigger being forward, meh it does not bother me.
The proper argument against this add is to show that my ownership of firearms has never harmed another person, and to show that what is true for me is true for nearly 100% of legal owners.
A secondary argument can be made for an increase in firearm education. ( abstinence only education does not do anything to reduce teen pregnancy/std transmission why should we expect complete ignorance to reduce accidental gun deaths) then maybe point out that removing a feature of a firearm could not possibly reduce accidental death, but that is weaker in that it invites greater restrictions.
This add is bad in that it accuses me of being a potential murder, not because it is inaccurate.
derby378
(30,252 posts)Moral: Science matters. If you're going to make an anti-gun poster, do it right the first time.
Packerowner740
(676 posts)A bullet is deadly, regardless of how it is illustrated.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)including this one
you can read the rest here
http://ethicsalarms.com/2014/04/22/pop-ethics-quiz-whats-wrong-with-this-picture/
Straw Man
(6,627 posts)Wrong. In the poster, one sees an intact cartridge. The bullet has not separated from the casing, meaning that the powder has not ignited. The only way for a cartridge in such condition to fly through the air would be propulsion from an external force: for example, being thrown by hand or catapulted from a slingshot.
Not deadly at all.