California Loses Bid to Revisit Ruling Striking Gun Rules

[VScott]

YES!!!

California Attorney General Kamala Harris and a police group lost a bid to join a lawsuit over local rules for determining who can carry a concealed weapon, as a federal appeals court left in place a decision that San Diego County’s gun permit rule violated the right to bear arms.

The decision by the court not to review the matter is a victory for freelance videographer Edward Peruta, who sued after his application to carry a concealed Colt 1911 .45 caliber pistol was denied by the San Diego sheriff.

A three-judge panel of the San Francisco appeals court in February ruled the county’s requirement that gun owners show a pressing need, such as a specific threat, in order to obtain a license to carry a concealed weapon was unconstitutional.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-11-12/california-loses-bid-to-revisit-ruling-striking-gun-rules.html

[notrightatall]

1. This guy agrees as well:

A victory for gun-nuttery!!

[DonP]

2. I'm sure there's another forum for your family albums

[notrightatall]

5. No, this IS THE forum for this lovely pic.

Gun-nuttery at it's finest.

[VScott]

3. Cool!

I'll take legislative and judicial victories over jokes, cartoons and insults anytime.

[notrightatall]

9. Me too, I love What Washington state just did!!

Well, it is a "small" step, but still!

[VScott]

14. That's okay too.

We're hitting home runs, while the other side is barely making it to 1st base.

[notrightatall]

16. Is this a "home run"?

[VScott]

21. Error

Pistol grip shotguns are a beast to shoot.

Tec-9's are crap

Too much scope on the AR.

but... at least they have proper trigger discipline.

[notrightatall]

23. Thanks for making my point.

Nutz is nutz.

[VScott]

25. You could at least thank me....

for expanding your limited knowledge base of firearms.

[upaloopa]

26. Something we will most likely file in the

don't need to know and don't care to know file which will soon be forgotten.

[VScott]

31. See... there's part of the problem we've been trying to point out for some time now.

How can you legislate what you don't understand?

[upaloopa]

32. You don't need to know gun lore to

have an opinion.

[friendly_iconoclast]

50. "You don't need to know gun lore to...have an opinion." Channeling Paul LePage?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025742717

L(e)Page's comment on Ebola: "We just don't know anything about ebola"

Willful ignorance-the true mark of an ideologue...

[HALO141]

151. No, but you do need to have a thorough knowledge

of all the facts if you want your "opinion" to have any credibility.

[upaloopa]

152. I am not looking for credibility from gun owners.

Gunners have their world, ideas, talking points and positions all worked out. It is a waste of time talking to them.

[HALO141]

205. Then what the fuck are you doing here?

Your interests would be better served littering your own group with google dumps.

[Eleanors38]

75. Isn't that the guy who fund raises for the Brady's...

...but has his own CA concealed-carry for several handguns?

[notrightatall]

77. Again, thank you.

Nutz is nutz

[samsingh]

82. thanks for posting these.

[GGJohn]

84. For posting a a bunch of silly pictures and cartoons?

The same thing that got the poster banned over at DI?
If that's your idea of relevance, then no wonder you and your comrades can't get anything passed.

[notrightatall]

86. Your "funny"

[GGJohn]

87. True to form.

[Straw Man]

139. Did you mean ...

Your "funny"

... "you are" or the possessive form of "you"?

[notrightatall]

143. Yes

[Straw Man]

144. It wasn't a yes/no question.

[notrightatall]

145. Yes, it was.

[Straw Man]

146. Common sense tells you it wasn't.

It was an "or" question with only two options.

[notrightatall]

148. Common scense would/should also tell you that I have no intention to engage with you.

Go play with your gunz.

[Straw Man]

150. Oh, are we done playing?

Common scense would/should also tell you that I have no intention to engage with you.

Such a shame. It was just starting to get interesting.

Go play with your gunz.

OK. What are you going to go play with?

[beevul]

180. If you aren't here for discussion, why are you here?

If you aren't here for discussion, why are you here?

[notrightatall]

185. silly gunner

[beevul]

187. In other words, you're here to disrupt discussion.

Thanks for the confirmation.

[notrightatall]

188. You seem to be doing a rather fine job of that yourself.

Your pals agree with you on that, too.
You are on the same side, right?

?1401904222

[beevul]

189. I'm attempting to have a discussion.

You are here to be disruptive, your "snipe hunt" post and your admission in it, being plenty of evidence.

Its a violation of the group rules to do such things, which you've admitted to doing.

[notrightatall]

190. you discuss nothing.

you won't even acknowledge your buddies in this picture, after defending what they do at every turn.
?1401904222

[beevul]

191. Where am I "defending what they do at every turn"?

Cite please.

That or just admit you made up a lie about me.

[notrightatall]

193. Have you read your own posts??

[beevul]

194. So cite it.

But you wont, because you can't.

[notrightatall]

195. Read your own posts.

But you won't, because you can't.

[beevul]

198. You made the accusation.

You back it up or retract it.

The onus is not on me, its on you.

[notrightatall]

199. nothing to retract, your own posts tell the story.

[beevul]

200. It must be from the same threads where you advocate mass firearm confiscation at every turn. N/T

[notrightatall]

201. Shit!! I'll cop to that, even though I have done no such thing.

But , hell ya!!! grab dem gunz!!




I proudly make this call !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



See the difference?? I am proud of my gun grabbing position, you and your ilk, on the other hand , hide and obfuscate your indefensible position. Sorry if the fact that you are a hell-bent gunner offends you....as it should.

[kioa]

204. Awwww

Poor loser is losing poorly.

I'm sorry that you--somehow--find life in the USA to be 'scary', but your irrational fears aren't my problem.

Your bizarre belief that there is just too darn much freedom in the USA has lost.
Deal with it.

[DonP]

147. Now that would make a great gun control tattoo for the True Believers out there

Considering their track record, very appropriate.

Have it tattooed on one cheek and Bloomberg's face on the other.

[samsingh]

182. i'm thanking him for posting the truth

we can't get anything passed because of voting fools and gun money

[notrightatall]

184. You can't change the stripes of these hell-bent gunners.

all you can do is poke at them with sticks , so they don't get too comfy.

They "hiss" allot, but always run back to their gun pile.

They seem to never figure out the "snipe" hunt.

[samsingh]

186. true

[kioa]

4. With such a well-thought out retort it's shocking that 2014 was such a disaster.

Truly shocking.

But let us move beyond the steep political consequences of gun control for now.

Why do you think Edward Peruta should be denied the same right that Diane Feinstein was allowed to exorcize?
Are there any other rights you care to deny to Mr. Peruta?

[notrightatall]

7. Y'all can have all the gunz ya want.

Doesn't make it any less "nuttery".

[kioa]

13. Or no 'gunz' at all.

And you get to make that exact same choice.
Isn't freedom neat?

Of course if anyone decides to take that freedom, then we get to have our day in court or a free election to settle such a disagreement.

After that the winner keeps that choice, that right & that freedom, and the loser gets to exorcize the right to post a cartoon.

EVERYBODY WINS!

[notrightatall]

15. exercise

This may point to why your 2nd amendment comprehension is so lacking.

[kioa]

20. Mine, the Supreme Court, the President's, the Democratic Party's official position,

and the American people's.

Thanks for showing us all errors of our ways with the usage of cartoons & interweb spelingz.

Impressive.
Really.

However I note you haven't answered my inquiry; namely, why do you think Mr. Peruta should be denied the right afforded to Diane Feinstein?

[notrightatall]

22. I do not.

Sorry your "gotcha" did not get me. Neither should be able to carry.
?w=595

[kioa]

36. It seems that your interpretation of the 2nd differs from that of

the President, the Supreme Court, the Democratic Party & DiFi.
(Protip: the word "bear" may play a part)

[notrightatall]

38. Point?

[kioa]

40. Your comprehension of the 2nd is lacking.

On another note:
Life in the USA isn't 'scary'.

Get out more. Educate yourself.

[upaloopa]

28. Since when are we not a part

of the American people and others who feel we have too many guns around us?

[notrightatall]

29. What?

[upaloopa]

47. You said it was the American people's

opinion. It is some of the American people's opinion. We are American people too.

[kioa]

78. He didn't. I did.

But very well, allow me to rephrase.
"Mine, the Supreme Court, the President's, the Democratic Party's official position,
and the vast majority of the American people's."

You don't get to take away others rights because of your personal 'feelings' anymore than minorities have to give up their rights because of the personal 'feelings' of bigots.

The Bill of Right protects....ya know....rights.
Including the individual right to keep and bear arms.

You have the right to not like the rights others have.
You even have the right to try and amend the Constitution to eliminate that protection of individual rights.

And we have the right to free elections.
Good luck convincing the American people that the problem with life in the USA is that we have too many rights.

[Straw Man]

62. Comprehension.

Before you malign anyone's use of the English language, you may want to check on the possessive form of the pronoun "it."

Gun-nuttery at it's finest.

-- http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=155642

I'm just sayin' ...

[notrightatall]

73. Bravo !

[Straw Man]

138. Thank you!

[GGJohn]

63. You need to warn us before posting selfies.

[pablo_marmol]

208. So as long as you bring up 'gun nuttery'........

let's review and enjoy your failure on gun-nuttery.com, shall we?

http://www.gun-nuttery.com/paper.php

With California on the brink of becoming True Blue*, only states on the east coast will be hanging on to their "moral superiority".

* http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/07/04/881431/-Why-liberals-should-love-the-Second-Amendment

[ileus]

6. America wins when we fight for the 2A...personal safety is important to everyone.

Until we all have personal LEO's there is always good reason to carry.

[notrightatall]

8. Nope.

Your opinion is one that kills Innocent children.

[ileus]

10. Nope

Your opinion makes easy victims.

[notrightatall]

11. So sad.......

[ileus]

12. Personal safety is no accident.

Remember train, train, train...

[notrightatall]

17. Enjoy your FEAR !!!!!

[ileus]

18. Who's afraid???

[notrightatall]

19. The guy stockpiling gunz.

He might think he's not afraid, but he is.

[discntnt_irny_srcsm]

30. I'm not offended

That makes it a waste of bandwidth.

[friendly_iconoclast]

33. I hope you find the graphics adequate compensation for political failure

[notrightatall]

34. Y'all would certainly know about "compensation"!!

[friendly_iconoclast]

39. The gibes of the politically ineffectual carry no sting

You lot certainly do act out when you don't get your way, don't you?

[notrightatall]

43. No "sting" , indeed.

[friendly_iconoclast]

48. Gun control advocacy: The last refuge of warmed-over Freudianism

I'm surprised you haven't claimed I have the brainpan of a stagecoach tilter

[notrightatall]

49. I needn't make that "claim".

You do, at every turn.

[friendly_iconoclast]

53. Another "telepsychologist", and not the first amongst gun panic-mongers

https://www.google.com/search?q=telepsychology&sitesearch=democraticunderground.com

[NYC_SKP]

111. And obsession with the penis, over and over and over again.

And problems in constructing arguments.

So sad. No cure.

[GGJohn]

65. You sound familiar,

didn't you get banned from DI for your silly cartoons?

[notrightatall]

67. What's di?

[GGJohn]

68. Oh, you know what it is.

Don't act dumb.
How about some more of those silly cartoons you were so fond of over at DI?

[notrightatall]

69. .ok

[GGJohn]

70. True to form.

[sir pball]

137. Just gonna chime in here, my dick is definitely bigger than my carry pistol..

..and it's a full-sized 1911

[notrightatall]

149. Is dick your husband?

[sir pball]

196. omg, SO witty! No darlin', I'm talking about my penis.

It's quite wonderful, never gotten anything but rave reviews let alone one of those HILARIOUS "itty bitty" comments.

Certainly don't feel the need to compensate for it, or anything else about me for that matter...but if it makes you feel better to imagine me as insecure, fat, balding and tiny-pricked, hey, your fantasies are your own bag. Have fun with it!

[notrightatall]

197. Those who can, do, those who can't, write about it.

rofl: :

[sir pball]

202. It's generally considered poor taste when one's at work..

I'm not on the line so I get plenty of leeway to screw around, but a, ah, "gun show" might be a little excessive even then...plus probably quite a health code violation. This place isn't that compelling when there's more fun things to do

[sarisataka]

55. Does that apply

To women gun owners as well?

[notrightatall]

56. Does what apply???

crazy is crazy.

[sarisataka]

58. That female gun owners

Are compensating for inadequate genitals?

[notrightatall]

59. Who said that?

[sarisataka]

60. That is the whole point of your pictures

and the lovely quip about flu shots, that males own guns because of having an unusually small penis.

So how does that apply to women who own guns? Are they compensating for a vaginal issue or a defective clitoris?

[notrightatall]

61. Is that your opinion?

I said nothing of the sort. Often one's own insecurities color how one sees things.

Maybe it's just you.

[kioa]

64. Indeed they do.

One need merely look at your posts to establish that.

How marvelous.

[sarisataka]

100. It is my opinion...

of your posts.
Are you going to say you are simply adding pictures; that they have no other meaning?

[notrightatall]

101. ...interesting...

Tell me, what do you see here?

[sarisataka]

106. A pretty butterfly

what do you see?

[notrightatall]

107. I'll be asking the questions, here. How about this one?

[sarisataka]

108. Some nice flowers

You?

[notrightatall]

109. This one?

[sarisataka]

110. Clouds

[notrightatall]

116. And, this one?

[sarisataka]

132. Not ignoring you, washing my hare seemed more important

[notrightatall]

135. That's ok. I' m just getting dinner ready.

[ileus]

35. You can protect most lives with one gun.

If you so wished....

Lot's of folks would recommend the G19 as the perfect CC and HD pistol. If personal safety is all you desire then that ONE pistol is all you need.

Of course if you want to get the whole family involved then you'll want to expand the collection to whatever you want. Small pocket carried pistols. Maybe something with a little more barrel for a nightstand gun. Maybe you want a long gun like an AR or nice Shotgun. Maybe you want to compete, or enjoy hunting. The possibilities are endless. Life Safety / Competition / Family Leisure / Hunting.

[friendly_iconoclast]

41. That would entail actually getting away from the computer...

...so it won't be done

[kioa]

24. Accuses others of being afraid while

insisting that innocent Americans lose rights & liberties because of...fear.

[notrightatall]

37. Innocent Americans dying because of someone's insecurities.

?quality=70

[kioa]

42. I'm surrounded by people who own guns.

Innocent people aren't dying because of it.

Life in the USA isn't 'scary'.
Educate yourself. Stop being afraid.

[notrightatall]

46. That fact, makes it much more likely that you will die of a gunshot then I.

Thems the facts!!

[kioa]

52. Ignoring the fact that Wyoming, Utah Iowa, N & S Dakota, Texas

and 21 other states have both lower murder rates & higher gun ownership rates...
(that's an actual fact)
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/murder-rates-nationally-and-state#MRord


I'm not the one insisting that others have to give up their rights because of unreasonable fears.
Why are you so afraid?
The USA isn't 'scary'. I promise.
Get out more. Educate yourself.

[friendly_iconoclast]

44. Attitudes like yours have helped to make gun control what it is today

Don't ever change...

[kioa]

54. Two questions.

1) What kind of attitude? Expand.

2) Just what do you think the gun control movement is today?

[notrightatall]

57. Pay attention.

[sarisataka]

71. Answers

1) a juvenile attitude that cannot discuss an important issue without making middle school level sexual innuendos, ironically claiming their opposition has a fetish problem.
- group assignment of guilt and ridicule of the 99+% of gun owners who are responsible. Not only would they be the greatest allies of effective gun control, it is likely no meaningful, lasting gun control legislation can be passed without the support of many of these gun owners.

2) the gun control movement today is attempting to organize a broad of widespread population who take a passing favourable interest in the issue. They have a zealous core of supporters for whom gun control takes on religious overtones.
The leadership is a group of ideologues for will throw everything else away on one issue. They happily accept money from Bloomberg never thinking he will want a return on that money on his other issues such as citizens united or "fixing" public schools with charter schools.
Republicans don't work that way. I know people claim he is independent but I can call a skunk a peacock it will still look the same and smell as bad.

[kioa]

72. Agreed.

[ileus]

45. Exactly....gun free zones are costing lives.

[GGJohn]

66. Thank you!!!!!

For helping the pro 2A movement.

[beevul]

115. " Innocent Americans dying because of someone's insecurities."

Those are tweets from people from your side of the gun issue there bud, nice folks huh? Now, since you brought up "Americans dying because of someone's insecurities", lets talk about John Crawford, or did you only mean some Americans who are dying because of someone's insecurities.

[notrightatall]

117. Sorry, don't know any of them.

Are these guys friends of yours? They are on the same side as you.

[beevul]

118. They're moms demand action members.

Now that you know who they are...


Do you approve of the action they suggest, or that such action led to in the killing of John Crawford?

Do tell.

[notrightatall]

119. Never heard of them. Don' t disagree with their point, though.

There is nothing remotely " normal " about carrying long guns to the grocery store. Only a crazy person, or an evil one would do such a thing.
Now, back to your pals in the Target: Do you support your kindred spirits pictured here?

[beevul]

121. I'll answer yours after you answer mine, since I asked first.

I'll answer yours after you answer mine, since I asked first.

Do you approve of the action they suggest, or that such action led to in the killing of John Crawford?

It just seems odd, to me, to see someone on your side of the issue complaining about "Innocent Americans dying because of someone's insecurities", and then trying to change the subject over and over again when I bring up John Crawford.

Your the one that brought up "Innocent Americans dying because of someone's insecurities".

Did you really want to talk about it or are you just here to post dumb pictures make snide comments and just generally be disruptive to discussion?

I guess when you respond with another dumb picture instead of talking about john Crawford, everyone will be able to see the answer to that question for themselves.

[notrightatall]

122. Already answered you.

How about your pals?

[notrightatall]

123. Don't you just look silly, now?

Back to your buddies,

[notrightatall]

120. John Crawford was killed by a poor performing police officer.

One who should be locked up for his crimes. You should be outraged at this " cop's" actions. No one else to blame. Back to these guys, friends of yours?

[beevul]

125. As a result of someone doing exactly what your side suggests.

Gee, I even have the proof:

An Ohio grand jury has declined to indict the white police officer who fatally shot John Crawford. A 22-year-old African American, Crawford was killed inside a Wal-Mart store last month after a caller phoned police to accuse him of brandishing a gun and pointing it at other customers. In fact, Crawford had picked up an unloaded BB air rifle on a shelf, an item that is sold in the store. Newly released surveillance footage shows major discrepancies between a 911 caller's account, and what really happened. The Justice Department now says it will launch a federal review to determine if Crawford's civil rights were violated. We are joined by two guests: Rashad Robinson, executive director of Color of Change, a national organization that has campaigned for Wal-Mart to release the surveillance tapes, and James Hayes, founding member of the Ohio Student Association, which has been organizing protests over the shooting.

http://www.democracynow.org/2014/9/25/no_charges_in_ohio_police_killing

"Poor performing police officer" my ass.

The police were called and told a something other than the truth, exactly like your buddies suggest doing above.

Who did the people in the photo you posted kill? Oh that's right - Nobody.

[notrightatall]

126. Nope, lousy cops doing a lousy job.

That is all, now back to your pals: you support them? They are on your side.

[beevul]

128. Now look, little fella...

Now look, little fella, I know clicking links is hard, and reading the content at them even harder, so in the spirit of being charitable, I'll help you out and do half the work for you:

911 OPERATOR: Beavercreek 911. Where is your emergency?

RONALD RITCHIE: I’m at the Beavercreek Wal-Mart. There is a gentleman walking around with a gun in the store.

911 OPERATOR: Has he got it pulled out?

RONALD RITCHIE: Yeah, he’s like pointing it at people.

And yet the video shows that what was said in that call was a blatant lie, and can be seen at this link:

http://www.democracynow.org/2014/9/25/no_charges_in_ohio_police_killing

So yes, someone followed the suggested course of action, put forth by your anti-gun colleagues, and it
led to law enforcement showing up on the scene with a false understanding of the facts, and it got someone killed.

Its a prime example of "Innocent Americans dying because of someone's insecurities", a subject you so helpfully brought up. You brought it up, you are interested in discussing it, aren't you?

[notrightatall]

129. That stupid cop was the only one who is responsible. He pulled the trigger. The end.

And that is Mr. little fella to you.

[beevul]

133. Who was responsible for the cops being there with the wrong idea of the situation?

Who was responsible for the cops being there with the wrong idea of the situation, in the first place?

(Hint: "stupid cop" ain't it)

This really isn't hard.

[notrightatall]

136. Nope.

All on him. Cops are supposed to have better judgment than that.


Stupid cop.

[beevul]

154. Well, at least you aren't blaming the gun.

I look forward to you, posting whenever theres a google dump, how it was the individual that pulled the trigger who was the problem, rather than the gun itself.


I'm sure everyone will enjoy it.

[notrightatall]

156. Stupid cop, that is the only cause.

Yup.

[notrightatall]

130. Also, I'm still waiting for your answer about your pals.

t

[beevul]

153. Who said they were "my pals"? N/T

[notrightatall]

155. They are on the same side as you are.

comrades in arms???



ya know, birds of a feather and all that......


Oh, they are your pals, alright.

[beevul]

158. Beause you say so?

Oh yeah, which of those, in the photo you posted, was responsible for getting someone killed?

Which of them suggested calling 911 and telling lies to the dispatcher when they see someone lawfully carrying a gun?

None of them? How...underwhelming.

I guess if I was forced to choose between people lawfully carrying guns in a peaceable manner, and people that openly suggest blatantly telling lies to the authorities, in a way that is very likely to get someone killed, I'd choose the carriers.

How about you?

If you are forced to choose between people lawfully carrying, and people that openly suggest blatantly telling lies to the authorities, in a way that is very likely to get someone killed...

Which would you choose?

[notrightatall]

160. Open carry is a sign of insanity.

That or evil intent. I will call 911 if I see some douche-bag carrying a gun in a grocery store. I can only assume that person is insane, thus a threat, or has evil intent, again being a threat. IMO those who would condone carrying a gun for no reason as insane, or evil themselves.

Especially since their whole basis for what the claim as 2nd A "rights" are based on a typo.

No different than what the GOP and SCOTUS ire doing with the ACA.

[beevul]

162. Thats your opinion.

"Open carry is a sign of insanity. That or evil intent."

You yourself don't even seem sure whether its a sign of insanity or evil intent. And, that's your opinion, hardly empirical fact.

But it does say alot about you.

"Especially since their whole basis for what the claim as 2nd A "rights" are based on a typo."

That's also your opinion. The President disagrees. Congress disagrees. The supreme court disagrees.

The American people disagree.

But they're all wrong, and you, with your well established credentials, certainly know better, than all of the above, right?

I look forward to your well written decision, after you are confirmed as a supreme court justice, which shows authoritatively, why the President, congress, the supreme court, and the American people are all wrong.

[notrightatall]

164. Correct.

[beevul]

165. Thankfully, you and your colleagues, are an inneffectual bunch.

And losing steam.

[notrightatall]

167. Don't you have somewhere to go and carry your beloved?

[beevul]

168. I actually don't carry a gun, and suspect that I never will.

Not that you could be bothered to know, or even ask, before assuming. Again that says more about you than anything else.

Oh, and I haven't bought a gun in over 10 years now, so strike "gun hoarder" off the list too. Oh, and I don't own any so called "assault weapons" either, so strike "Rambo wannabe" off your list of insults too.

You have insults, but do you actually have anything else?

I'm guessing not so much...

[notrightatall]

176. So, just a gun nut by proxy, then.

[beevul]

179. Upon what information could you possibly base such a conclusion?

Was it that I agree with the President, Congress, the U.S. Supreme court, and a clear majority of the American people, that amendment 2 protects an individual right?

Or is that how you label anyone that disagrees with you on the gun issue?

[beevul]

170. You never answered the question.

If you are forced to choose between people lawfully carrying, and people that openly suggest blatantly telling lies to the authorities, in a way that is very likely to get someone killed...

Which would you choose?

[sarisataka]

171. I think that question has been answered

To paraphrase Orwell, Some innocent deaths are more tragic than others.

He doesn't want to come out and say that and get banned again.

[notrightatall]

174. I reject the premise of your question.

[beevul]

181. Of course you do.

Because the answer is discomforting, otherwise, maybe even to yourself.

[notrightatall]

183. No, just that your question reeks of gun nuttery.

[notrightatall]

124. C'mon, dude! Keep up!

[VScott]

27. I have most of their albums.

Saw them live a couple of times...

[notrightatall]

51. "Fuck Christmas" is my favorite of thier songs.

[Eleanors38]

83. I have an old T which sez: Have a Beer with Fear."

From my old punk rock daze. The shirt I missed getting was not a punk one. It was one which advertised a central a.c. company: "Ruud. A Way of Life." Had to settle on one featuring a Betty Paige bondage photo where she was suspended via block & tackle. Not bad for the mosh pit.

[Eleanors38]

76. Her-r-r-re comes da fear thingy. Ri-i-i-ight on time.

A busted 45 will repeat the same lyric, but a good 45 will repeat the same action.

[notrightatall]

79. Ahh true colors , indeed.

So sad when a life revolves around the love of a cold inanimate object.

[kioa]

85. Says someone whose life revolves around fear of an inanimate object.

No one is forcing you to own a gun.
It is a choice you are free to make.

That same choice is afforded to all innocent Americans.
I trust my fellow citizens with their rights. You should too.

Educate yourself.
Stop being afraid.

[Eleanors38]

74. Her-r-r-re comes da Penis™. You can set watches AND ignore the 18,000,000

Women who have guns. But cartoons have a way of hanging around in the generations-old, pre-gender neutral era of both T. Rex and the Blues Magoos.

[notrightatall]

80. You are so right. To imply that women gun nutz have penis issues would be , well, just silly.

[GGJohn]

81. Do you miss posting your silly cartoons at DI?

[Eleanors38]

88. Something familiar about that clippity-cloppity style.

predictable as a "well-modulated bowel movement" (Dali). Saw the same stuff couple years back; cruddy bull-in-the-ring stuff, then & now.

[notrightatall]

90. You can have this one.

[Eleanors38]

102. Careful! They're out.

[notrightatall]

104. Responding to one's self?

For you... What do you see?

[Eleanors38]

112. I know. Claim they are trolling for bass.

[notrightatall]

89. puffery.

[GGJohn]

91. True to form.

[notrightatall]

93. No, this is:

Alfred Gockel

[GGJohn]

94. Well at least you finally posted a picture of a nice painting,

but I just know you'll revert back to those silly cartoons you're so fond of .

[notrightatall]

95. It's a lithograph.

[GGJohn]

96. No, it's a picture of a lithograph.

[notrightatall]

97. No, it's a digital file of a picture of a lithograph.

[notrightatall]

99. You, maybe, should see someone about your delusions.

I'm not all together sure you are well.

[NaturalHigh]

103. Good!

K and R

[DonP]

105. Poor politically savvy Kamala, blew her chance to get into this

She carefully avoided getting involved in any 2nd amendment cases for years, including this one when she had the chance in 2012.

Now, at the last minute, she wants to ride in as the knight in shining armor and the court told her and the Brady Bunch to go away, they missed that boat.

So now we wait and see if SCOTUS will take it, or pass on Cert and let the Circuit court ruling stand ... and shall issue becomes the law in California just like here in Illinois..

I'm sure there's a cartoon for that somewhere that will sway an En Banc sitting of the Circuit court to see it the gun controllers way.

[Eleanors38]

114. Cartoons? Some big-gutted dude in a Stormy Kromer

is so-o-o-o Bobby Vinton, or that dude in a fedora with a pipe in his mouth. I saw that on a sweatshirt for the Northern Colorado University Fighting White Guys.

[DonP]

131. Hey, watch it. I have two Stormy Kromers bought 'em at the factory store

Bought a matching one for one of my grandsons too.

Surprisingly he actually wears it in the Winter, like this week for instance

[Eleanors38]

134. I'd like one, too. I have to admit I usually wear a

Reversible balaclava for headgear; it's so easy to solve camo and cold weather problems in one whip it out garment.

[Eleanors38]

113. Kamala Harris is also facing a suit for enforcing a law

which bans displaying a PICTURE of a handgun in signs advertising dealers licensed to sell them. This kind of image ban is in some other states (even Texas!), but is not enforced, except by Harris, a fulminating banner. Grounds for the suit? Violation of First Amendment protection for free speech, wouldn't you know?

[petronius]

127. Since the SD Sheriff chose not to appeal, and the panel has not allowed others

to so, how would it be possible for the case to go further? Does the SD Sheriff still have the option of appealing to the full 9th, or is the only route for the Court itself (or USSC?) to reach down and grab the case?

[pablo_marmol]

140. Here's some discussion on Calguns:

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1003933

[petronius]

173. Thanks for the link - it does seem that the other two cases have become

more important than Peruta at this point, as they're still (potentially) moving forward...

[pablo_marmol]

141. Sweet news!

I was in the courtroom in S.D. for the case. It will be interesting to see how this proceeds.

[Inkfreak]

142. The butthurt from the anti-2A'ers is on full display in this thread.

[notrightatall]

157. Not anti 2A. Just your interpretation there of.

You gunners who hang your hat on a "typo" are just as bad as those going after the ACA, and its subsidies.

that and your unwavering support for these guys:

?1401904222


And if you do not know what I'm talking about, school your own silly asses.

[beevul]

159. And the Presidents. And congresses. And the Supreme courts...

"Not anti 2A. Just your interpretation there of."

And the Presidents interpretation there of, and congresses, and the Supreme courts...


You're right but everyone else is wrong, right?

If I were on the loosing side of this issue, I might be inclined to lash out and post a pic in every post, then claim I wasn't trying to convey messages I was clearly intent on conveying, too.

Compared to iverglas, your tactics are very amateurish...and that's being charitable.

[notrightatall]

161. That is correct.

[beevul]

163. I can't decide whether your jpak, hoyt, bongbong or shares. n/t

[notrightatall]

166. Well ,spend more of your time figuring that out.

Sheeeeeesh.

[beevul]

169. By any other name, the taste is just as rancid...

[sarisataka]

172. And now we know

who it is

[notrightatall]

175. You know nothing.

silly little people.

[sarisataka]

177. I know enough

To know what I know and am old enough to know that I don't know

[notrightatall]

178. what ya lookin' for?

Last edited Thu Nov 13, 2014, 06:47 PM - Edit history (1)

[sarisataka]

192. Nothing

That I haven't already found

[Inkfreak]

203. No idea what "typo" you're talking about.

And I dunno who those guys are or why I'm a "gunner". But you make a compelling example of what I posted about.

[pablo_marmol]

206. Local news coverage:

http://www.10news.com/news/court-rules-san-diego-countys-gun-policy-is-unconstitutional-11122014