Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 07:42 AM Mar 2015

Guns And Money: The Silencer Industry Seeks To Break Down Barriers

Sometimes players in an industry have to take on the role of evangelists in order to open up crowds of new customers. The suppressor market – an accessory category within the firearms industry – is one space that’s seen growth as people tune in to the benefits of making rifles, shotguns and pistols less noisy.

Also known as “silencers,” suppressors have been around since the early 1900s. Traditionally they are cylindrical devices filled with layers of metal baffles, or dividers, which slow the gases that escape a gun barrel when a bullet is fired and muffle the sound. Are they as quiet as often depicted in popular action films? No, but they do reduce the volume of a pistol, rifle or shotgun blast enough to protect the hearing of hunters and shooting enthusiasts, which may explain why suppressors have seen a surge recently despite critics’ arguments that quieter gunfire would benefit the criminal element.

Though it’s hard to find exact figures, Americans probably bought between 100,000 and 200,000 suppressors last year, according to industry insider estimates. In 2014 the number of such products registered by civilians with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms surpassed 571,000—that’s a 58% increase since 2012. Last year the number of people waiting to have their suppressor permits approved surpassed 80,000.

Liberty Suppressors – a small manufacturer based in Trenton, Georgia – has noticed the increase in interest. Founded in 2004 by husband-wife team David and Teresa Saylors, the 16-person company has enjoyed an average 2X growth every year of operation and David Saylors says the push to educate gun owners, coupled with the ease of research the internet provides, will continue to spur the market, which he says is vast and largely untapped given the number of gun owners in the country compared with the number of suppressors in circulation. “It’s immediately appealing to a person who fires firearms routinely at a practice range,” says Saylors. “Once they shoot a suppressed firearm, it’s so much more pleasant they don’t want to go back to unsuppressed guns.”

Suppressors are legal, in fact required for hunting, in most of Europe.

More at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2015/03/29/guns-and-money-the-silencer-industry-seeks-to-break-down-barriers/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns And Money: The Silencer Industry Seeks To Break Down Barriers (Original Post) oneshooter Mar 2015 OP
Isn't this analogous to installing high restrictive mufflers on a muscle car? rickford66 Mar 2015 #1
The sound for me... shedevil69taz Mar 2015 #2
A firearm without a sound suppressor benEzra Mar 2015 #3
I wish all my firearms were sound suppressed. aikoaiko Mar 2015 #4
ehhh not all and not all the time thanks shedevil69taz Mar 2015 #6
For my kind of shooting, it wouldn't matter much, but you're right about the impact on ballistics. aikoaiko Mar 2015 #7
Good question, but the 24-7 ring in my ears doesn't equal "a well-tuned V-8." (Paul Newman's... Eleanors38 Mar 2015 #5
I can support this derby378 Mar 2015 #8

rickford66

(5,521 posts)
1. Isn't this analogous to installing high restrictive mufflers on a muscle car?
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 08:49 AM
Mar 2015

I'm not a gun owner and not opposed to responsible people owning guns. But, I thought some of the attraction was the sound. Just as we car enthusiasts like the rumble of a V8.

shedevil69taz

(512 posts)
2. The sound for me...
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 09:31 AM
Mar 2015

has never been anything other than an unfortunate side effect...and is also why I wear double layerd ear protection when at my local civilian shooting range...can only wear one layer when shooting my military weapons though...because of the required headgear...and we are supposed to do everything in training the same as we would in war...

benEzra

(12,148 posts)
3. A firearm without a sound suppressor
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 12:13 PM
Mar 2015

is like a car with no exhaust system at all, just open headers.

Firearms sound suppressors are all straight-through designs, like glass packs, so suppressed centerfires are still fairly loud, just not ear-damaging loud. I'm thinking 25 or 30dB reduction would be typical, so a 155dB centerfire might come down to 125-130dB.

shedevil69taz

(512 posts)
6. ehhh not all and not all the time thanks
Tue Mar 31, 2015, 09:05 AM
Mar 2015

Sound suppressors have the unfortunate side effect of altering the ballistics of whatever weapon they are attached to.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
5. Good question, but the 24-7 ring in my ears doesn't equal "a well-tuned V-8." (Paul Newman's...
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 01:59 PM
Mar 2015

Favorite sound.)

The only thing appealing about a gun's report is when it's a deer rifle, 1/2+ mile away, bouncing through the Texas Hill Country. That is strangely calming and galvanizing on a hunt.

Silencers are too damned expensive! That needs to change.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
8. I can support this
Tue Mar 31, 2015, 05:11 PM
Mar 2015

Hearing loss is a public health issue. I can wear ear plugs at the range, but when hiking through the woods, it's not always practical.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Guns And Money: The Silen...