Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 01:59 PM Jun 2015

Now explain to me again, exactly how background checks protect us..

Seems like *another* killer easily passed one..

On Thursday, investigators did a trace of the handgun used in Wednesday's shooting and determined that it was a .45-caliber handgun Roof purchased from a Charleston gun store in April,


http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/us/charleston-church-shooting-suspect/
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now explain to me again, exactly how background checks protect us.. (Original Post) virginia mountainman Jun 2015 OP
If Roof was a black teen he'd have been incarcerated for his crimes and wouldn't blm Jun 2015 #1
I understand the gun was purchased by another person, and given Roof. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #9
Yes.. virginia mountainman Jun 2015 #12
My goof. I see that now. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #15
So this is bad? BeyondGeography Jun 2015 #2
The form DustyJoe Jun 2015 #3
Did the killer purchase the gun? The CNN article didn't say so. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #10
Background checks. deathrind Jun 2015 #4
Baulk? Most 2A regulars here support universal BG checks. nt Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #11
Yep Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #19
Part of the Narrative©. The truth is an enemy to some, here. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #21
It involves statistical probability rock Jun 2015 #5
Now explain to me again, exactly how penaltys for murder protect us... ret5hd Jun 2015 #6
You're absolutely right. beevul Jun 2015 #17
They don't .....but that's just a diversion anyway. ileus Jun 2015 #7
youre correct it's time to make guns illegal Romeo.lima333 Jun 2015 #8
Start the amendment process, then. nt Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #14
LOLOLOL. GGJohn Jun 2015 #18
Have fun... beevul Jun 2015 #20
Are you sure the racist passed the NICS test, or was it a Smerf? Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #13
Gun control in general doesn't protect you n/t Matrosov Jun 2015 #16

blm

(113,043 posts)
1. If Roof was a black teen he'd have been incarcerated for his crimes and wouldn't
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:09 PM
Jun 2015

have passed a background check at 21, now, would he?

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
9. I understand the gun was purchased by another person, and given Roof.
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:51 PM
Jun 2015

Do you have any info on this?

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
12. Yes..
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 03:00 PM
Jun 2015

Read the article..the part I highlighted...

He used his birthday money to make the purchase himself...

BeyondGeography

(39,369 posts)
2. So this is bad?
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:13 PM
Jun 2015
Since February 28, 1994, the Brady law has blocked more than 2.1 million gun purchases, according to data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics. That is 343 purchases blocked every day. More than one million of those attempted purchases were by felons. Another 291,000 denials were to domestic abusers. And, 118,000 gun sales to fugitives were blocked thanks to background checks.


http://www.bradycampaign.org/inthenews/brady-campaign-releases-a-report-analyzing-20-years-of-effective-background-checks

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
3. The form
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:22 PM
Jun 2015

I am sure he honestly answered all the check boxes honestly on the 4473 background check form
dealing with any arrest/conviction records.

especially

12 e. Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana, or any depressant, stimulant, or narcotic drug, or or any other controlled substance?

His April arrest was for posession of suboxone strips — typically used to treat addiction to heroin and other opiates

I am certain he honestly answered Yes to that question.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
10. Did the killer purchase the gun? The CNN article didn't say so.
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:56 PM
Jun 2015

Last edited Fri Jun 19, 2015, 04:30 PM - Edit history (1)

EDIT: I see now the article did say he purchased it.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
4. Background checks.
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:24 PM
Jun 2015

Are not 100% fool proof to keep firearms out of the hands of people who should not own a firearm such as (Felons/Mentally Compromised Individuals) but if it stop just one person from getting a weapon who should not have one it is well worth the effort and enforcement.

I am still amazed that pro 2nd Amendment supporters still baulk at BG checks. One would think that given the proclivity for 2A supporters to view the world with such fear that they feel they need a firearm on them at all times to protect themselves from other people with guns, that having a first line defense (although not perfect but better than nothing) is something they would be in favor of.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
19. Yep
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 07:30 PM
Jun 2015

I wonder where he gets that. I have not seen anyone posting here that is not for UBC. Most favor opening NICS to the public.

rock

(13,218 posts)
5. It involves statistical probability
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:25 PM
Jun 2015

No individual case is in itself meaningful for this context. Similar to understanding climate change.

ret5hd

(20,491 posts)
6. Now explain to me again, exactly how penaltys for murder protect us...
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:33 PM
Jun 2015

Seems like *another* killer easily did it anyway.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
17. You're absolutely right.
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 04:57 PM
Jun 2015

In GD theres a poll about whether or not the threat of the death penalty deterred the shooter.

It is essentially universally agreed that it wouldn't.

Yet the same people think that a lesser penalty would deter someone with murderous intent from getting the gun in the first place.


Makes.No,.Sense, common or otherwise.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
7. They don't .....but that's just a diversion anyway.
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 02:34 PM
Jun 2015

Pass that and then they'd need this. Pass this and then they'd demand more of that, because this and that didn't work so more of that and this is needed.

Remember....guns kill people, and the 2A isn't a individual right. Or the right to own firearms only covers flintlocks. Also remember many believe the 20xx supreme court decision was when individuals were given the right to own firearms.



GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
18. LOLOLOL.
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 07:17 PM
Jun 2015

Yeah, good luck with that.
The majority of your fellow American citizens disagree with you by a margin of 75%, think you can get a ban with that lack of support?



 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
13. Are you sure the racist passed the NICS test, or was it a Smerf?
Fri Jun 19, 2015, 03:01 PM
Jun 2015

Last edited Fri Jun 19, 2015, 04:31 PM - Edit history (1)

EDIT: The article did say he purchased it.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Now explain to me again, ...