HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » "despite objections ...

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:33 AM

 

"despite objections from most Democrats..."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026900204

Yeah, about that... If you find yourself siding with Scott Walker (R) on this, and I know some of you gunthusiasts here will, then you're clearly on the wrong website.

63 replies, 7040 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 63 replies Author Time Post
Reply "despite objections from most Democrats..." (Original post)
Electric Monk Jun 2015 OP
Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #1
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #9
sarisataka Jun 2015 #20
Surya Gayatri Jun 2015 #21
sarisataka Jun 2015 #26
beevul Jun 2015 #33
ileus Jun 2015 #2
benEzra Jun 2015 #13
Shamash Jun 2015 #18
Human101948 Jun 2015 #43
Shamash Jun 2015 #47
Electric Monk Jun 2015 #50
Shamash Jun 2015 #54
Shamash Jun 2015 #3
Electric Monk Jun 2015 #4
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #12
Shamash Jun 2015 #17
jimmy the one Jun 2015 #28
clffrdjk Jun 2015 #41
krispos42 Jun 2015 #5
Electric Monk Jun 2015 #8
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #10
sarisataka Jun 2015 #14
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #16
Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #51
krispos42 Jun 2015 #11
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #15
krispos42 Jun 2015 #40
sarisataka Jun 2015 #6
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #7
Travis_0004 Jun 2015 #19
flamin lib Jun 2015 #22
Travis_0004 Jun 2015 #23
beevul Jun 2015 #24
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #34
beevul Jun 2015 #35
sarisataka Jun 2015 #37
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #44
discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2015 #25
DonP Jun 2015 #27
Lurks Often Jun 2015 #29
friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #36
Lurks Often Jun 2015 #38
Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #52
Lurks Often Jun 2015 #55
Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #56
Matrosov Jun 2015 #30
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #31
virginia mountainman Jun 2015 #32
Shamash Jun 2015 #39
Fred Sanders Jun 2015 #42
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #45
GGJohn Jun 2015 #57
Matrosov Jun 2015 #58
Shamash Jun 2015 #59
GGJohn Jun 2015 #60
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #61
GGJohn Jun 2015 #62
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2015 #63
cherokeeprogressive Jun 2015 #46
clffrdjk Jun 2015 #48
beevul Jun 2015 #49
Duckhunter935 Jun 2015 #53

Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:43 AM

1. Preach it, Electric!

 

"...you're clearly on the wrong website."


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Surya Gayatri (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:27 AM

9. I dream of the day gun control advocates can articulate arguments rather than rely on

silencing dissent.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Surya Gayatri (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:10 AM

20. Ironically echoing the sentiments

of another politician

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #20)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:12 AM

21. Oh, reeeeaaaally? Inteereeesting, inteereeesting!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Surya Gayatri (Reply #21)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:36 AM

26. It is interesting isn't it

How often Gun Control and Republican policies mesh

-stop and frisk
-seizure of private property
-absolute loyalty
-secret lists
-bureaucratic determination of rights
-more money=more rights

Just to name a few

Prominent Republicans for Gun Control
-Nixon
-Reagan
-Bloomberg (independent my ass. He has helped elect more TPers to office than Democrats)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #26)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:01 PM

33. Don't forget bloombergs astroturf moms, the VPC, and the bradys, trying to deep6 a Dem fundraiser.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:50 AM

2. This is why we fight for a more progressive 2A stance in our party.

How we ever allowed the repukes to steal one of the most important issues concerning our rights is beyond me. Want to sweep 50 states in an election, honestly stop trying to erode the bill of rights.


Killing rights does not a progressive make.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ileus (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:32 AM

13. The focus on gun control was originally seen by the Third Way as a means to look "tough on crime"

to right-leaning law-and-order voters, thereby peeling some of them away from the repubs in the early '90s. Instead, it backfired spectacularly and drove millions of gun-owning Dems and indies to either sit home or vote (R) in '94, '96, '00, and '04. Unfortunately, the Third Way and affiliates doubled down and made it a Tier 1 shibboleth in the late '90s and through the '00's, and with help from plenty of Wall Street and foundation money, it gradually took over the party. Which is how a traditionally right-leaning authoritarian position (UK, Australia, the Brady Campaign, Jim Crow, the Mulford Act, the Sullivan Law) became transmogrified into a "progressive" one.

If John F. Kennedy were alive today, he'd be kicked out of the party over his ownership of an AR-15, and be the subject of a daily Two Minutes Hate over his enjoyment of target shooting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to benEzra (Reply #13)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:44 AM

18. JFK was also an NRA member. Don't forget the hate he'd pick up for that. Clearly not a liberal.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shamash (Reply #18)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 06:07 PM

43. Know your history...that was before the NTA went insane...

 

In November 1976, the NRA’s old guard Board of Directors fired Carter and 80 other employees associated with the more expansive view of the Second Amendment and implicit distrusting any government firearm regulation. For months, the Carter cadre secretly plotted their revenge and hijacked the NRA’s annual meeting in Cincinnatti in May 1977. The meeting had been moved from Washington to protest its new gun control law. Winkler writes that Carter’s top deputy Neal Knox was even more extreme than him—wanting to roll back all existing gun laws, including bans on machine guns and saying the federal government had killed Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy as “part of a plot to advance gun control.”
....After the coup, the NRA ramped up donations to congressional campaigns. “And in 1977, new articles on the Second Amendment appeared” in American Rifleman, Burbick noted, “rewriting American history to legitimize the armed citizen unregulated except by his own ability to buy a gun at whatever price he could afford.” That revisionist perspective was endorsed by a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee chaired by Utah Republican Orrin Hatch in 1982, when staffers wrote a report concluding it had discovered “long lost proof” of an individual’s constitutional right to bear arms.

The NRA’s fabricated but escalating view of the Second Amendment was ridiculed by former U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger—a conservative appointed by President Richard Nixon—in a PBS Newshour interview in 1991, where he called it “one of the greatest pieces of fraud—I repeat the word ‘fraud’—on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.”

http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/the_nra_once_supported_gun_control/



Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Human101948 (Reply #43)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 06:21 PM

47. I'm well aware of history, having lived through more of it than most

 

The NRA then was vastly different than the NRA now. But I do not see the gun control movement as having enough intellectual depth to recognize that a politician can be a liberal and still like to shoot. Apparently, this is not nearly liberal enough for some:



And the "ban them all" crowd would probably fail JFK on the gun purity test as well. FYI, if Ms. Giffords carried that gun into NY or CT it would be a felony with a mandatory minimum 2 year sentence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shamash (Reply #47)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:09 PM

50. That, right there, is a perfect example of a gun nut.

 

You care enough to try and play "gotcha" over this shooting, because guns are too awesome to criticize.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #50)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:37 PM

54. What you said makes no sense in the context of what I wrote

 

Since I did not play "gotcha" in any way and neither did I say or imply anything about guns being too awesome to criticize.

However, if you wish to disagree with my description of Gabrielle Giffords as liberal, feel free to do so, just so everyone can see how far from the mainstream your position on the issue actually is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:03 AM

3. Ad hominem

 

Saying an argument is bad because a bad person said it is one of the core logical fallacies, which you at least really ought to know by now. I don't automatically assume everything you say is wrong just because you are the one saying it. I judge what you say on its merits.

Someday, a well-informed, rational gun control advocate will present a sound argument to support their beliefs here on DU. Today is not that day.

Tomorrow does not look good, either.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shamash (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:06 AM

4. So you do agree with him? Just checking. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:32 AM

12. Do you agree with the Republican governor taking down the Confederate battle flag.

I mean, it's a Republican, after all.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #4)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:42 AM

17. I don't even know what he said

 

I might agree with it, I might not. But your statement is exactly as logically sound as saying "Scott Walker said the sun rose in the east this morning, so if you agree with that you are clearly on the wrong web site."

Ad hominem makes it an inherently flawed argument and that's as far as I need to pursue the matter. If you do not have the chops to make a non-flawed argument, that is not a failing on my part.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Shamash (Reply #3)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 12:02 PM

28. shamash shams on JFK, & the benign nra

shamash: JFK was also an NRA member. Don't forget the hate he'd pick up for that. Clearly not a liberal.

I doubt JFK was a life member by choice, just that the nra awarded 'life membership' to all US presidents back then (soon to be curtailed).
As well, that was the pre-knox nra prior early 70's, the benign nra which offered all presidents honorary memberships, when nra was often for guncontrol efforts, including partially GCA68, which was also supported by Charlton heston.

And here's what JFK thought of 2ndA: “John F. Kennedy supported {2ndA} rights for Americans, saying in an April 1960 statement, “By calling attention to a well-regulated militia, the security of the nation and the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms, our founding forefathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of government tyranny, which gave rise to the Second Amendment, will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains a major declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason, I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.” http://watchdogwire.com/florida/2013/11/18/remembering-president-john-f-kennedy-nra-lifetime-member/

Shamash: Someday, a well-informed, rational gun control advocate will present a sound argument to support their beliefs here on DU...

Well, one just did to debunk your unsound notions.

In 1969, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon resigned {&/or disavowed} his honorary life membership to the NRA. 1995, former President H. W. Bush also resigned his life membership to the organization..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jimmy the one (Reply #28)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 04:38 PM

41. That doesn't say what you think it says.

 

And here's what JFK thought of 2ndA: “John F. Kennedy supported {2ndA} rights for Americans, saying in an April 1960 statement, “By calling attention to a well-regulated militia, the security of the nation and the right of each citizen to keep and bear arms, our founding forefathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of government tyranny, which gave rise to the Second Amendment, will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains a major declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason, I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.” http://watchdogwire.com/florida/2013/11/18/remembering-president-john-f-kennedy-nra-lifetime-member/


In 1969, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon resigned {&/or disavowed} his honorary life membership to the NRA. 1995, former President H. W. Bush also resigned his life membership to the organization..
just how is that a sound argument for gun control?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:23 AM

5. Mmmm... purity test.

Delicious! And where do I go to sign my loyalty pledge?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krispos42 (Reply #5)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:25 AM

8. Shall I take this reply to mean that you side with Gov Walker (R-Wis) as well? nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #8)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:29 AM

10. Shall I take this reply to mean you prefer women who carry for protection

to be kept defenseless if confronted by a rapist or stalker?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #10)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:35 AM

14. Remember...

women are responsible for whom they date. Make a bad choice and the consequences are on you.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=168313

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #14)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:39 AM

16. Well, I'm married now -- very happily so -- but if I was still a single girl

I would want to make sure any man I was with would respect me enough to allow me make my own choices about my safety. I could not see myself with some guy demanding, "Honey, you'll just have to remember to try and relax and take one for the good of society."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to sarisataka (Reply #14)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:22 PM

51. That was a low point for that poster

 

Blaming the woman for her own death and refusing to edit or apologize. Just sickening.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Reply #8)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:31 AM

11. Dunno, didn't read the article.

I'm at work and get shit service on my phone, and I can't eat at my desk.

Foreign Object Damage.

Why bother, when you're going to be like this?



Do you side with President Bush (R) that ketchup is a tasty condiment?


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krispos42 (Reply #11)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:35 AM

15. "Do you side with President Bush (R) that ketchup is a tasty condiment?"

Why do I get the feeling the only reason why he hasn't replied to you is because he is now racing about his house throwing out bottles and packets of ketchup?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #15)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 04:30 PM

40. You'll have to talk louder

I can't hear him over the roar of the crickets.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:23 AM

6. Have you forgotten

the Gun Control lies in bed with Bloomberg- who specifically targets Democrats in tight elections. He is responsible for helping elect Tom Cotton (R)- whom, if you recall, likes to author letters to countries, attempting to undermine President Obama's (D) negotiations.

Who are you siding with?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:24 AM

7. "you're clearly on the wrong website"

If you side with a billionaire Republican control-freak corporatist whose policies unduly targetted minorities does that mean you're on the wrong website?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:46 AM

19. There are 40 states without a waiting period on handguns

 

Also. If you want a waiting period, then I could understand it being on the first gun somebody owns.

What is the benefit of making somebody wait 48 hours to buy a .22 handgun, when they already own 3 other handguns?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Travis_0004 (Reply #19)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:23 AM

22. Waiting periods and purchase restrictions greatly reduce gun trafficking and straw buyers.

For instance, about 15 years ago a hundred or so handguns were intercepted in NYC. The shipping manifest listed them as auto parts and they were traced back to Dallas gun stores where they were purchased over a weekend. Since SC dropped its one gun a month law the number of illegal guns from SC in neighboring states has risen dramatically. No link, working from memory but google is your friend.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to flamin lib (Reply #22)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:31 AM

23. I'm sure somebody smuggling guns would just give up if they had to wait 48 hours.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:47 AM

24. That means alot...

 

In fairness, It should be pointed out, that in the below two threads about brady bunch, MDA and VPC trying to suppress a fundraiser for Democrats, EM was all over it, telling people that suppressing a fundraiser for Democrats was a terrible thing to do. He put party before issue like a champ, and now is simply asking that we do the same.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172140392

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172140350


Wait.


None of the above actually happened. That's right. None of the above, actually happened.


EM was totally silent when Democrat fundraisers were targeted by bloombergs two groups and the VPC, yet now comes over here expecting to rub our noses in something?

That means a lot, coming from the host of [strike]the Bloomberg forum[/strike] GCRA.




Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #24)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:12 PM

34. *None* of the more prominent antigun types here said anything against that...

...including the OP, as you noted.

So much for their moral authority...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #34)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:14 PM

35. Precisely. N/T

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #24)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:37 PM

37. That second link

Gun Control Groups Urge Cancellation of Hollywood Fundraiser for Mark Begich and Mark Pryor
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172140350

brought as an OP by one of the most prolific gun control posters is one of gun control's greatest success stories. Backed by Bloomberg's money and his plethora of organizations two Democratic Senators were unseated by their Tea Party opponents.

Yet gun control proponents demand purity tests and ask who do Second Amendment supporters stand with.

The complacent silence of gun control proponents shows who they stand with...
Sen. Mark Begich (D-Alaska) has conceded his hard-fought race to Sen.-elect Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), giving the GOP what's likely to be a 54-seat Senate majority heading into next Congress.

The Associated Press called the race for Sullivan last week, but Begich refused to concede until 30,000 remaining ballots were counted. Sullivan leads Begich by 48 percent to 45 percent with most of the vote now counted.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/224455-begich-concedes-alaska-senate-race
Republican Rep. Tom Cotton has defeated Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor in Arkansas, according to a CNN projection.

The win is one of six seats Republicans need to pick up to regain control of the Senate.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/11/04/politics/arkansas-senate-tom-cotton-win-digital/

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #24)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 06:15 PM

44. wow -- just wow nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 09:55 AM

25. Bravo, I was looking for a way to tell which party I really belong to

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:43 AM

27. "Most Democrats"! Damn, let's find out who didn't oppose it and get out the pitchforks and torches

 

Obviously they need to be purged from the party immediately. If we lose more seats, so what, at least they'll be "pure".

As our latest version of the Party Zampolit, will you be starting those recall petitions?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 12:07 PM

29. Did I miss the memo appointing you the arbitrator of all things Democratic?

 

Last I looked you were merely the host of a safe haven who bans any poster not completely in lockstep with what YOU think is right.

Does your "logic" apply to not agreeing with Hillary 100% or Sanders 100% or not agreeing with the President 100%?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lurks Often (Reply #29)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:25 PM

36. The subject of gun control at DU attracts self-appointed 'chief ideologues'...

...who sooner or later start to believe that they run the place.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #36)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 03:37 PM

38. And when they don't get their way, they ran to the people who DO run the place

 

until one of them told them that they deserved the hide they got.

It's kind of understandable they are so bitter and angry, after all they've been on a pretty consistent losing streak for years now

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lurks Often (Reply #29)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:26 PM

52. The same host that blocked a poster

 

For a self delete.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Duckhunter935 (Reply #52)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:58 PM

55. Someone seems to have abandoned his thread and went to GD

 

The OP In GD didn't last very long before it got locked.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Lurks Often (Reply #55)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 08:06 PM

56. Lol

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:04 PM

30. No, many are on the correct website

 

Make no mistake about many "progressive gun owners" here being nothing more than rabid Republicans having little better to do in their lives than to pose at Democrats who just happen to regurgitate every Republican and NRA inspired talking point

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Matrosov (Reply #30)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:39 PM

31. Last I looked the #1 name in gun control is

a Republican billionaire whose policies disproportionately targeted minorities and whose campaigning for gun control gave the GOP historic wins with recall elections.

What website should his supporters post on?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Matrosov (Reply #30)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:59 PM

32. Keep telling yourself that..

As statehouse, congressional, and governorships fall..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Matrosov (Reply #30)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 04:23 PM

39. No, we just can do just fine by repeating -your- talking points

 

"Law-abiding [strike]African-Americans[/strike] gun owners are not responsible for the actions of the criminals who happen to be [strike]African-American[/strike] gun owners, and you can't treat the law-abiding ones as potential criminals."

From the journal "How to crush any [strike]racist[/strike] gun control argument", by...Matrosov

P.S.: If you have any evidence to back up your assertion about "many "progressive gun owners" here", I have left an infinite amount of comment space below for you to provide it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Matrosov (Reply #30)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 05:56 PM

42. I guess being at DU behind thin veils beats joining the Fox and NRA throngs on the RW sites where such folks would just blend in.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Fred Sanders (Reply #42)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 06:16 PM

45. The #1 name in gun control is --

a Republican billionaire whose policies disproportionately targeted minorities and whose campaigning for gun control gave the GOP historic wins with recall elections.

What website should his supporters post on?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Matrosov (Reply #30)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 10:10 PM

57. Put your money where your mouth is and tell us who the rabid repubs here are?

That is if you have the gumption to.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #57)

Fri Jun 26, 2015, 02:57 PM

58. Ha, half this group

 

How strange how many people here never post outside the Gun Control & RPKA group, and those who do, often aren't seen anywhere but in gun threads in General Discussion.

I'd have an easier time believing there weren't a bunch of RW trolls on here if it weren't for the fact that the people on many firearms-related and right-wing forums seem to preoccupied with trolling DU.

Google "trolling Democratic Underground" and "trolling DU" and you'll get a huge list of links to firearms/GOP/RW/88 forums, from AR15.com and even Stormfront to some place called Conservative Underground.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Matrosov (Reply #58)

Fri Jun 26, 2015, 04:09 PM

59. Why do I need to post elsewhere?

 

It is seldom useful for me to post a "me too!" message on something I agree with, which is pretty much every liberal hot-button issue. I'll do it occasionally for things that are really exciting, but that is about it. This is the only issue where my fellow liberals treat me and 30% of my Democratic friends like we had swastikas carved onto our foreheads, and I consider it well worth my time to mock the ones who are beyond hope and help to educate those who are genuinely interested in learning more about a subject before forming an opinion on it.

Two things to take away from this: First, you made an accusation and when called on it, refused to back it up with anything but generalized demonization and diversion. Here, let me make it easy on you. You said:

Make no mistake about many "progressive gun owners" here being nothing more than rabid Republicans having little better to do in their lives than to pose at Democrats

So, you didn't say "all" of us. So, if you are incapable of naming the ones you think are "rabid Republicans", maybe you can narrow it down by naming some of the "progressive gun owners" here who aren't? Because if you can't or won't name anyone who is or is not, it looks an awful lot like you are just engaging in random shit-slinging to cause doubt or suspicion. You know, part of that "it is also important to take advantage of natural divisions that exist between these various groups of gun owners" that I read about somewhere. Oh right, that was you. (I love your journals, btw. I've archived copies so I can continue to quote them in case they ever disappear.)

Second, your favorite group is Gun Control & RKBA. Why can we not make the assumption that you are a right-wing plant simply trying to make Democrats look like intolerant haters? I mean, your clearly stated position is that you want to ban all gun ownership, which would cause the party to lose 3 out of 10 Democratic votes for at least a generation. Sounds like the divisive sort of thing a not-very-bright right-wing troll would try to do.

And it doesn't seem to be any flimsier than your unsupported assertion...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Matrosov (Reply #58)

Fri Jun 26, 2015, 10:49 PM

60. So because we support the 2A and don't post in other groups to your satisfaction,

that makes us RW trolls?

That's got to be the stupidest fucking thing I've heard all week.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #60)

Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:07 PM

61. I'm the RW troll who spent last weekend defending Bernie Sanders.

Because that's what we do, apparently.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nuclear Unicorn (Reply #61)

Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:13 PM

62. It's hilariously funny watching certain controllers here

tie themselves into knots condemning his vote on the PLCAA and how they misrepresent what it actually does.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to GGJohn (Reply #62)

Fri Jun 26, 2015, 11:18 PM

63. When I was defending him it wasn't even about guns but rather his pro-minority rights record.

Another RW hot button issue, as we all know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)


Response to Electric Monk (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 06:44 PM

48. I see GD didn't care for your purity test.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to clffrdjk (Reply #48)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 06:51 PM

49. Well...

 

Unlike SOME groups, the GD SOP actually means what it says, to the dismay of a few extremists.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to beevul (Reply #49)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 07:29 PM

53. And some groups SOP is like jello

 

As the host blocks who he disagrees with even if there is no SOP violation. Like a single self deleted post.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread