Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 06:22 AM Feb 2016

America is no longer gun-shy about gun control

When President Barack Obama announced he would not campaign for or endorse any candidate that doesn’t support stricter gun laws, it was another marker in a sea change in the discourse over guns in America.

Even in the absence of significant new federal legislation, the gun debate has been transformed since Newtown — and Aurora. And Tucson. And Chattanooga. And Fort Hood. And Charleston. And San Bernardino. And … the list goes on, tragically. Together, these mass shootings have brought so much public attention to gun policy and gun violence that the conversation has changed radically.

How? For many years before the Newtown shooting in December 2012, Democrats avoided talking about new restrictions on guns for fear of losing votes, especially in swing states. In 2008 and 2012, for example, candidate Obama downplayed gun control and emphasized his support of the Second Amendment. Now the Democratic presidential contenders are making gun control central planks in their platforms and it’s a litmus test for Obama’s support.

But does this new conversation mean that we are on the verge of meaningful change in America’s approach to guns? There are many signs of hope for advocates of gun control — and also cause for them to be concerned.

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/ucla-faculty-voice-america-is-no-longer-gun-shy-about-gun-control
59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
America is no longer gun-shy about gun control (Original Post) SecularMotion Feb 2016 OP
I agree with this section: Kang Colby Feb 2016 #1
Ownership of military-style rifles and machine guns should be restricted SecularMotion Feb 2016 #3
What past restrictions are you talking about? nt hack89 Feb 2016 #4
Machine guns already are highly restricted. GGJohn Feb 2016 #5
Please define "military-style" n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #6
I guess they are coming for my '03 Springfield too, an actual military weapon DonP Feb 2016 #10
Ooooooh! rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #52
Yes, and it's called an '03 because 1903 when it was developed DonP Feb 2016 #54
You seem to think rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #55
... GGJohn Feb 2016 #56
Did you read our SOP? beevul Feb 2016 #57
Bullshit. They are rarely used because they are *rifles*. benEzra Feb 2016 #39
"It is not necessary to "ban" any weapons" Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #48
I've seen 'making up reality' before, but that really takes the cake. beevul Feb 2016 #50
re: "How about "No"." discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #53
Agreed. The control outlook is in the hands of culture war extremists... Eleanors38 Feb 2016 #15
NRA has had carte blanche mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #2
re: "sane laws that actually work" discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #7
well remember please that you asked.... mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #9
It would be helpful if you first knew what you were talking about. beevul Feb 2016 #12
fbi sitting on 3millions mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #13
The number of gun related deaths is 33k. The majority of which are suicides not murders Press Virginia Feb 2016 #19
Hilarity.... beevul Feb 2016 #23
"Swept under the rug"? Ummm, no. The FBI publishes them annually. benEzra Feb 2016 #40
Actually, there were only 11,961 reported murders *using any weapon*. benEzra Feb 2016 #41
thanks and here's my take discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #20
my eyes, what word salad Duckhunter935 Feb 2016 #21
"First we both have to agree that gun nuts fetishize guns, violence and second amendment rights" Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2016 #22
re: "well remember please that you asked...." discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #36
Can you provide a link to the "million of unchecked background checks" claim? Marengo Feb 2016 #37
Perhaps you missed my reply discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #42
I think you may be tapping the fingers down to a nub... Marengo Feb 2016 #43
didn't know if I should reply mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #45
Well, thanks for answering discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #46
When you're able... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #49
moving on discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2016 #44
Fetishize is exactly right rjsquirrel Feb 2016 #51
Your interlocutor is having a time-out. Something about gun control seems to induce logorrhea... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #58
Who will be coming for your guns, gun owner? Marengo Feb 2016 #59
Hopefully the people can get their message thru the anti-BS. ileus Feb 2016 #8
The "people" send their message loud and clear with each NICS check DonP Feb 2016 #11
Also ammo plants DashOneBravo Feb 2016 #38
"Sea change?" Change of metaphors since "tipping point" seems rusted over. Eleanors38 Feb 2016 #14
Sandy Hook was a tipping point that CAUSED the sea change. nt flamin lib Feb 2016 #16
Don't see it. Gun rights advocates are more mobilized than ever... Eleanors38 Feb 2016 #17
What that 'sea change' in blue Massachusetts looks like: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #18
They couldn't get an AWB passed in neighboring Rhode Island post Sandy Hook hack89 Feb 2016 #24
Did I hear someone say "tipping point"? pablo_marmol Feb 2016 #25
It has changed. deathrind Feb 2016 #26
This is why we'll never get anywhere. beevul Feb 2016 #27
It's a sad sight to witness otherwise intelligent people in the throes of false consensus effect friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #29
You make a lot of... deathrind Feb 2016 #30
Nope. Going by the evidence provided is not an assumption. beevul Feb 2016 #35
Someone forgot to inform the citizens of Illinois, Minnesota, and Massachusetts... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #28
It will come about in the same... deathrind Feb 2016 #31
Your analogy is inapt. branford Feb 2016 #32
Your, deathrind Feb 2016 #33
And your lack of a cogent/honest response is noted as well. pablo_marmol Feb 2016 #47
You conflate criminal misuse and lawful use friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #34
 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
1. I agree with this section:
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:08 AM
Feb 2016
Besides the NRA, gun control advocates are often their own worst enemies. There are important and effective gun reforms worth adopting: universal background checks, better reporting of criminal and mental health data into the federal background check database, stronger enforcement of gun laws, cracking down on rogue gun dealers. Yet advocates also push for predictably ineffective laws like bans on military-style rifles, which, contrary to common belief, are not machine guns and are rarely used in crime. Gun control proponents laugh off the NRA’s claim that the government wants to confiscate guns and then propose to outlaw the most popular rifle in America.


http://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/ucla-faculty-voice-america-is-no-longer-gun-shy-about-gun-control

We've been saying this for years.
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
3. Ownership of military-style rifles and machine guns should be restricted
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:34 AM
Feb 2016

It is not necessary to "ban" any weapons, but regulations on ownership and use should be stricter on military-style weapons.

As far as their use in crimes, they have been rarely used due to past restrictions.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
5. Machine guns already are highly restricted.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 09:26 AM
Feb 2016

Military style weapons should be restricted? What makes an AR-15 and the way it operates any different then my semi auto .22 rifle?
It's one pull of the trigger for every round sent downrange, that technology has been around for over 100 years, so why now is it more dangerous?

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
10. I guess they are coming for my '03 Springfield too, an actual military weapon
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 11:21 AM
Feb 2016

It can consistently hit man sized targets at 600+ yards with iron sights. Just ask Alvin York about it.

But let me guess, your demand for "restricting" certain types of rifles with "military styling", doesn't count as taking anyone's guns, right?

Just some more "Common Sense" ideas from the gun grabber nonsense factory.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
54. Yes, and it's called an '03 because 1903 when it was developed
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:25 AM
Feb 2016

It was a weapon personally chosen by Teddy Roosevelt. Issued all the way through WWII and still used as a special weapon in Vietnam for sniping.

But perk up, I know you're upset and feel all picked on and like a loser since gun control continues to flail away, but you're just another couple of hides away from a nice long rest.

Then you can calm down, or do what all the other gun control fans do and go to Discussionist and get banned there too.

With supporters as effective and "active" as you, no wonder gun control is such a hot mess and utter failure. By all means keep up the effective facade. It defines you and the "movement" so very well.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
55. You seem to think
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:26 AM
Feb 2016

I am trying to persuade anyone.

Nope, just making fun of you nutters.

03 lol.

Full Ignore on DU is like full auto in my AK.

People who brag about things they own online are almost always lying.

lmao making nutters sooo maaaaaad with their impotent inability to threaten me with their guns.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
56. ...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 10:42 AM
Feb 2016
Nope, just making fun of you nutters.


Not true, what you're doing is making an ass of yourself with your petty insults.
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
57. Did you read our SOP?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:23 PM
Feb 2016
You seem to think

I am trying to persuade anyone.

Nope, just making fun of you nutters.

Full Ignore on DU is like full auto in my AK.


Not trying to argue any points.

Not trying to argue the topic of this group.

Admits to being here just to make fun of others.



Someone please tell me why that isn't block worthy?

benEzra

(12,148 posts)
39. Bullshit. They are rarely used because they are *rifles*.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:20 PM
Feb 2016

And rifles year after year are the least misused of all weapons, accounting for fewer deaths annually than bicycles.

The rifles you keep talking about banning are immensely popular, they're just not commonly misused. There are no "prior restrictions"; production and sale of AR-15 type rifles has never been banned in this country, not even during the 1994-2004 debacle.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
50. I've seen 'making up reality' before, but that really takes the cake.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:52 AM
Feb 2016
As far as their use in crimes, they have been rarely used due to past restrictions.


I've seen 'making up reality' before, but that really takes the cake.


It is not necessary to "ban" any weapons, but regulations on ownership and use should be stricter on military-style weapons.


How about "No".

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
53. re: "How about "No"."
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 08:18 AM
Feb 2016

Flush his crap. How about WHY? When I encounter unreasoned meaningless crap I flush it.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
15. Agreed. The control outlook is in the hands of culture war extremists...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:30 PM
Feb 2016

...who would rather keep some controversy alive with stupid ban proposals than to accomplish UCBs. And they will remain in charge of the "debate" as long as MSM elites keep mumbling support for them.

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
2. NRA has had carte blanche
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:19 AM
Feb 2016

for a very long time because politicians have rolled over for them...in my view this makes all the gun violence state sponsored since it's the politicians who passed the laws...greased by NRA money....it's time to stop this and have some sane laws that actually work

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
9. well remember please that you asked....
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:44 AM
Feb 2016

First we both have to agree that gun nuts fetishize guns, violence and second amendment rights....also as per the MO of congress they pass laws they are completely incapable of funding...re fbi is now sitting on million of unchecked background checks...but because of loopholes just submitting info to the fbi means the gun shop owner or dealer (that's the law abiding one) gets to sell guns as a "straw purchaser" as many a he wants...(as evidenced by the millions of unprocessed background checks)....and the dealer gets to say that he sold only guns with background checks.....because of a technicality in actuality all across america all types of weapons by the millions are sold with virtually no bacground check; this is how the ame tragedy happened....in counties all across america...even tho laws are being passed in every state about background checks ...sheriff's and law enforcement are refusing to do them ..they are openly defiant...because they say they don't have the funding...I believe them...but that doesn't stop the gun dealer from selling guns with unprocessed background check...literally for months the media and the government said dylann roof had passed his background check...and that was all shot to hell when one of the family members went and testified in oregon state legislative session...in salem about how Roof had never passed a background check....certainly even tho the FBI knew this they were not saying anything about it....the whole circus of the government clean up crews showing up to a massacre and cleaning up the mess...in such a cold and efficient manner....tax payers pay billions of dollars to the government every year to clean up the bloody messes of 10's of thousands of murders....33 thousand last year I think....and yet bernie has voted 5 times to block the ability of victims families to sue...gun manufacturers....there are a couple of informative articles that have been on cnn this past week you can check them out....I don't vouch explicitly for any stats because gun violence even tho it's out in the open is so swept under the rug by the lawmakers, (politicians) bureaucracy (fbi) and nra (lobbyists..) ok so you know how the bureaucracies in various states are putting "moratoriums" the death penalty for various reasons....let that be the starting point for gun control....the state admits the job they are doing is an epic failure...a moratorium is applied and then various plans are suggested...but instead of going through congress there has to be a national vote.....that the NRA can't by pass voters and politicians can't by pass voters...because the government has failed so catastrophically to uphold the clusterfk of laws that are on the books state to state.....ok...told you that was going to be long....what do you suggest?

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
12. It would be helpful if you first knew what you were talking about.
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016
First we both have to agree that gun nuts fetishize guns, violence and second amendment rights....


We don't have to agree on any such thing. I see you anti-gun folks doing far far more fetishizing that the gun folks. Pro-gun folks see the second amendment the same was as most folks see the first. But you knew that.

fbi is now sitting on million of unchecked background checks


No they aren't.

but because of loopholes just submitting info to the fbi means the gun shop owner or dealer (that's the law abiding one) gets to sell guns as a "straw purchaser" as many a he wants...(as evidenced by the millions of unprocessed background checks)....and the dealer gets to say that he sold only guns with background checks.....because of a technicality in actuality all across america all types of weapons by the millions are sold with virtually no backround check


Good god. Did you wipe these falsehoods clean after pulling them out?

this is how the ame tragedy happened


Is there a translation machine I can run this through so that it makes sense?

even tho laws are being passed in every state about background checks


No, they really aren't. Bloomberg is trying, I grant you that, but it seems his resources are divided between that, and attacking a Democratically elected Democratic Governor, for having the nerve to actually compromise.

....tax payers pay billions of dollars to the government every year to clean up the bloody messes of 10's of thousands of murders....33 thousand last year I think...


There were 11208 gun murders in 2014. Newsflash. That's not "tens of thousands".

and yet bernie has voted 5 times to block the ability of victims families to sue


Victims families can still sue. Just not for the unlawful actions of a third party. But you knew that.


Like I said, it would be helpful if you first knew what you were talking about.











mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
13. fbi sitting on 3millions
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:06 PM
Feb 2016

by their own estimate...more probably since the director says they can't seem to keep track of the stats....ame...church in charleston...you know clement pickney...democratic congressman and fellow church goers....you really don't remember this?

re no they aren't...fbi said they were...that is what the told congress and the wh....take it up with them not me....I am aware of bloomberg and money will not fix this problem only a change of thinking will....victims parties can still sue...doesn't mean JS (jk sht) but you know this....and yes the number reported was over 33 thousand...you are probably looking at an NRA site so that is FUBARED as far as stats are concerned...bottom line...no credibility and you have no solutions...next...

 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
19. The number of gun related deaths is 33k. The majority of which are suicides not murders
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 04:39 PM
Feb 2016

The inclusion of the suicide numbers are to purposely mislead people on gun violence.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
23. Hilarity....
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 10:58 PM
Feb 2016

First, heres a bit of hilarity that everyone here should see:

....I don't vouch explicitly for any stats because gun violence even tho it's out in the open is so swept under the rug by the lawmakers, (politicians) bureaucracy (fbi) and nra (lobbyists..)


That's you two posts up talking about how you don't vouch for the numbers you're providing.

Now heres you just a few posts later, casting aspersions toward me for questioning numbers that you yourself say very plainly that you don't vouch for:


...you are probably looking at an NRA site so that is FUBARED as far as stats are concerned


You just gave yourself away. Oops.

victims parties can still sue...doesn't mean JS (jk sht)but you know this


Actually it does mean something. it means manufacturers can not be sued for the third party misuse of a legally sold product. And that is as it should be.

and yes the number reported was over 33 thousand..


That number doesn't represent 'homicide' with a firearm', it represents homicides and suicides.

So you are wrong.

no credibility and you have no solutions


Says the poster who I have interacted with all of twice now.














benEzra

(12,148 posts)
40. "Swept under the rug"? Ummm, no. The FBI publishes them annually.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:29 PM
Feb 2016
"....I don't vouch explicitly for any stats because gun violence even tho it's out in the open is so swept under the rug by the lawmakers, (politicians) bureaucracy (fbi) and nra (lobbyists..)"

"Swept under the rug"? Ummm, no. The FBI publishes them in a huge publication every single year, in the Uniform Crime Reports, accessible from the FBI website. The weapons data is in Table 20, Murder by State and Type of Weapon.

Murder, by State and Type of Weapon, 2014 (FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 2014)

[font face="courier new"]Total murders...................... 11,961
Handguns............................ 5,562 (46.5%)
Firearms (type unknown)............. 2,052 (17.2%)
Clubs, rope, fire, etc.............. 1,610 (13.5%)
Knives and other cutting weapons.... 1,567 (13.1%)
Hands, fists, feet.................... 660 (5.5%)
Shotguns.............................. 262 (2.2%)
Rifles................................ 248 (2.1%) [/font]

2013:

Murder, by State and Type of Weapon, 2013 (FBI)
[font face="courier new"] Total murders...................... 12,253
Handguns............................ 5,782 (47.2%)
Firearms (type unknown)............. 2,079 (17.0%)
Clubs, rope, fire, etc.............. 1,622 (13.2%)
Knives and other cutting weapons.... 1,490 (12.2%)
Hands, fists, feet.................... 687 (5.6%)
Shotguns.............................. 308 (2.5%)
Rifles................................ 285 (2.3%) [/font]

That continues a 20-year trend of declining gun violence, which is now roughly half of what it was in the early 1990s.

benEzra

(12,148 posts)
41. Actually, there were only 11,961 reported murders *using any weapon*.
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:34 PM
Feb 2016

Almost 4,000 of those were with weapons other than guns.

Murder, by State and Type of Weapon, 2014 (FBI Uniform Crime Reports, 2014)

[font face="courier new"]Total murders...................... 11,961
Handguns............................ 5,562 (46.5%)
Firearms (type unknown)............. 2,052 (17.2%)
Clubs, rope, fire, etc.............. 1,610 (13.5%)
Knives and other cutting weapons.... 1,567 (13.1%)
Hands, fists, feet.................... 660 (5.5%)
Shotguns.............................. 262 (2.2%)
Rifles................................ 248 (2.1%) [/font]

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
20. thanks and here's my take
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 05:47 PM
Feb 2016
First we both have to agree that gun nuts fetishize guns, violence and second amendment rights
What anyone does or does not view as a fetish doesn't and shouldn't play a role in the law.


fbi is now sitting on million of unchecked background checks
The NICS works to complete BGCs within minutes. Checks have a statutory limit of 3 days after which they proceed if there has been no prohibition found.


but because of loopholes just submitting info to the fbi means the gun shop owner or dealer (that's the law abiding one) gets to sell guns as a "straw purchaser" as many a he wants...(as evidenced by the millions of unprocessed background checks)....and the dealer gets to say that he sold only guns with background checks.....because of a technicality in actuality all across america all types of weapons by the millions are sold with virtually no bacground check; this is how the ame tragedy happened
I'm not exactly sure what you're saying here. All FFLs must regardless of venue, time of day, phase of moon... run an NICS BGC on every buyer. The FFL may delay the sale while the BGC is in progress. The NICS and any state checks have 3 days by law to render either an okay proceed decision or a denial and reason. After the 3 days, the sale proceeds with or without a BGC decision. BGCs that take longer than 3 days and are returned with a denial AFAIK go to either ATF of FBI who take steps based on any laws that may have been broken. Sales between private citizens must follow state laws. Various states mandate BGCs for private sales.


in counties all across america...even tho laws are being passed in every state about background checks ...sheriff's and law enforcement are refusing to do them ..they are openly defiant...because they say they don't have the funding...I believe them...but that doesn't stop the gun dealer from selling guns with unprocessed background check...literally for months the media and the government said dylann roof had passed his background check...and that was all shot to hell when one of the family members went and testified in oregon state legislative session...in salem about how Roof had never passed a background check....
What you may not know: several states have implemented their NICS participation as full Point-of-Contact for firearm purchases. South Carolina is not one of them. I suppose all states have their own priorities in electing what to fund and for how much but the Full POC states (in red at the link: https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics/general-information/participation-map ) have the FFL contact a state law enforcement agency which runs its own checks of state databases while also forwarding the buyer's data for the federal check. Most of those states look to me to have a strong BLUE influence. Federal money is available for states to use in improving their BGC systems.


tax payers pay billions of dollars to the government every year to clean up the bloody messes of 10's of thousands of murders....33 thousand last year I think
The CDC shows for 2014 33,599 deaths caused by firearm discharge. Of those 21,334 were suicides, 464 were law enforcement related, 586 were accidental and 270 were cases where the intent was not determined. That leaves 10,945 homicides which would include justifiable homicides. I expect the number of justifiable homicides to rather low. ( Here is a link to the CDC database query page: http://webappa.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_us.html )


bernie has voted 5 times to block the ability of victims families to sue...gun manufacturers
Senator Sanders voted for the PLCAA (Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act) and AFAIK defends most provisions of the act. The PLCAA prevents those companies and individuals in the industry from being sued for the criminal actions of private citizens. Is that a problem and why?


but instead of going through congress there has to be a national vote
A national vote on/for what?


what do you suggest?
Glad you asked.

1: States need to take a leading role. Every state should be Full POC with NICS.
2: Every state should have at least a means for private sellers to go through law enforcement for a BGC for their buyer.
3: I'm against the death penalty but think violent offenders are released too often and too soon.
4: Most people locked up have no support system on release and return to crime. Help and monitoring are needed.
5: The war on drugs needs to end.

That's a start.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
22. "First we both have to agree that gun nuts fetishize guns, violence and second amendment rights"
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 08:23 PM
Feb 2016

The only ones fetishizing guns are those who refer to guns in sexualized terms, fetishizing violence in a fabrication on your part and I doubt you would claim women and minorities fetishize the 13th and 14th Amendments or journalists fetishize the 1st Amendment.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
36. re: "well remember please that you asked...."
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 10:24 AM
Feb 2016

Yes, I did. When I asked, my interest was to hear what laws you favor to address the gun-control/rights issues. In your reply you highlighted many things from problems to failures to NRA hate. You didn't suggest anything that could be formed into a law or a change to an existing law.

You did ask me for my thoughts and I wrote a few and addressed some of what you wrote.

Out of respect for the ideas of progress, Democracy and for my time in responding I'm respectfully asking you to consider answering my original question of how you propose to change or improve the existing BGC system and related laws or reply what I wrote and to address my thoughts:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172186719#post20

Thanks

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
37. Can you provide a link to the "million of unchecked background checks" claim?
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 11:13 AM
Feb 2016

A admittedly quick Google search didn't locate that info.

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
43. I think you may be tapping the fingers down to a nub...
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 11:36 AM
Feb 2016

I have my doubts we'll see substantive responses to any of our queries. The Polyannaish side of me would like to think the poster is taking a break to fully understand the concept of the paragraph.

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
45. didn't know if I should reply
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 06:51 PM
Feb 2016

you make everything sound easily solvable and it's not...politicians roll over for the NRA when there's no funding for bureaucracy to realistically manage the risks and pass on the tragedy and cost to the tax payer...well Scalia has died...the person replacing his seat will hear the testimony how gun dealers sell guns all across this nation with out background checks and how the FBI lies about processed background checks and how local law enforcement across this nation will not do background checks yet at the same time they will resell guns that have been used in crimes back on the streets (there is a map of states that allow this) to be used in more crimes...I wonder what they do with the money don't you?....It's very clear by the massive amount of gun violence and the epic failure of bureaucracy and gun dealers to do the job they are supposed to do that it needs to change your solutions are not solutions....it's time to look to other nations that have gotten it right and model ourselves after them....Cheers, Maggie

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
46. Well, thanks for answering
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:27 AM
Feb 2016


For the record I'm against abolishing what we've had for 220 years and starting over.

There are useful changes to be made. Specifically regarding the NICS, the system should be opened to all law enforcement such that anyone wanting to sell a gun can have them run the check. The problems with the database should be fixed.

Funding??? Yes neither Republicans nor Democrats have been forthcoming with bills to fund what's needed to begin the repairs and upgrades.

Looking to other nations can't be a bad thing but keep in mind that the governments over a hundred nations in the world have been influenced by the US Constitution in developing their own foundational documents.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
44. moving on
Mon Feb 15, 2016, 09:46 AM
Feb 2016

I always give folks the benefit of the doubt. It's always good to vent on what angers but progress requires change and the only effective means for change is cooperation.

Maybe you don't have any specific ideas. I guess we'll never know.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
51. Fetishize is exactly right
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 06:30 AM
Feb 2016

Look at them right here in this thread spitting righteous (right wing) rage and shouting down any challenge. It's a sexual thing for the nutters, most of whom are middle aged men with declining virility. Hence the fetishistic element. You might as well propose castration.

Note how they argue. It's like rabid dogs. We "controllers" (lol) are supposed to find their aggression intimidating except on the internet they can't fondle their precious iron and intimidate anyone so they pose as tough guys and tell you about the guns they own.

I wish they would all just go join RedState and vote for Trump. Actually most probably are and they just troll liberal sites because they get off on bullying like all right wingers.

Best thing you can do is laugh at them and mock them and enjoy the theatrical tears of impotent rage they produce in response. No one is supposed to mock a tough guy with a big piece!!!!

Demography and technology will change the gun debate just as fast as gay marriage changed, within just a few years. These angry and fearful folks are dying off (or accidentally shooting themselves off lol).

The fetishistic obsession is rooted in a deep and paranoid racism as well, and we all know it. That's why Obama (who had done nothing towards gun rationality) is so good for gun sales.

Yes we are coming for your guns. Cold dead fingers and all.

Now boys let the rage filled threats and howls spew. Sucks when someone can't be shouted down huh?


I'll miss it since I have them mostly on Ignore.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
58. Your interlocutor is having a time-out. Something about gun control seems to induce logorrhea...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

...in those with poor socialization skills.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
11. The "people" send their message loud and clear with each NICS check
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 12:00 PM
Feb 2016

Month after month record high NICS checks.

Firearm manufacturing facilities going to 3 shifts a day, expanding and building new plants in gun friendly states and bringing their jobs and tax dollars with them.

Along with the crowds waiting for an open lane at pretty much every shooting range in the country.

Personally, my concealed carry classes have doubled in size over the last 6 months and I'm doing three 16 hour (Illinois requirement) this month alone. Once whole class is nothing but 12 employees from an Apple Store! So even the tech nerds are getting into it.

Lots of the students are new shooters, 40% are women and will be buying their first gun after a few classes, so they can make a better, informed decision on what's right for them.

As more people get into the sport and start shooting, the anti message is being laughed at more and more.

The anti BS is quickly being reduced to a handful of whiners throwing dust in the air and trying desperately to get attention and some credibility. And failing miserably at it.

DashOneBravo

(2,679 posts)
38. Also ammo plants
Sat Feb 13, 2016, 12:08 PM
Feb 2016

Remington just built a second larger plant in Arkansas.

Winchester is closing the old ammo plant and have built a new plant in Mississippi. 1000 jobs added.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
17. Don't see it. Gun rights advocates are more mobilized than ever...
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 03:53 PM
Feb 2016

The illusion of tipping seas is a meme pushed by MSM, which is the only viable element of the controller/ban outlook.
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
18. What that 'sea change' in blue Massachusetts looks like:
Thu Feb 11, 2016, 04:37 PM
Feb 2016
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172186124

Boston Globe: "Gun licenses on the rise in Mass.; 7.8% increase seen" (+44% over 5 years)

https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/01/27/gun-licenses-rise-mass-percent-increase-seen/mru1o8yuwM9MiMuG1GRd6O/story.html

Gun licenses on the rise in Mass.; 7.8 percent increase seen
By Matt Rocheleau Globe Staff January 27, 2016

Tens of thousands of new gun licenses were issued to Massachusetts residents in 2015, continuing a recent surge, according to state data.

There were 342,622 active Class A firearms licenses statewide, according to figures provided by the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services earlier this month. That was up about 24,700, or 7.8 percent, from the same time a year ago.

A Class A license, the broadest license available under state law and by far the most popular, allows the holder to carry rifles, shotguns, or handguns. It also allows the holder to carry a concealed handgun.

The number of Class A licenses has increased by 104,150, or 44 percent, from five years ago....


A heartfelt plea to you and all other gun control advocates:

By all means, please continue to do what you've been doing

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
26. It has changed.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:27 AM
Feb 2016

It is only a matter of time until regulations will be enacted to try and reduce the amount of violence caused by firearms. The idea that nothing can or should be done because there are too many guns out there or because bad guys won't obey laws is nonsensical.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
27. This is why we'll never get anywhere.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:42 AM
Feb 2016
It is only a matter of time until regulations will be enacted to try and reduce the amount of violence caused by firearms.


Firearms don't cause violence. You think they do or should be treated like they do, and we know they don't and will not stand for them to be treated as if they do. This is why we'll never get anywhere.

The idea that nothing can or should be done...


Nobody says nothing should be done, except you "lots more gun control" guys, when you say "our way or nothing" like you have for the last 20 plus years.


...because there are too many guns out there...


Now were getting to what you really object to. You lot are losing your ability to hide it. You just don't like guns, possibly to the point of hatred. That's a new one.

...or because bad guys won't obey laws is nonsensical.


Well, that's what makes them bad guys. Whats the point of making them double secret bad guys, other than trying to harass the rest of us who aren't?

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
29. It's a sad sight to witness otherwise intelligent people in the throes of false consensus effect
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:53 AM
Feb 2016

They are convinced that millions of Americans will somehow, someway embrace their views
any day now, in spite of empirical evidence to the contrary.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
30. You make a lot of...
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 08:07 AM
Feb 2016

Assumptions.

"Now were getting to what you really object to. You lot are losing your ability to hide it. You just don't like guns, possibly to the point of hatred. That's a new one."

I enjoy my firearms, all 5 of them. Pistols / Rifle/Shotgun. You can check my posting history. I have never said I "hate" firearms. I have never advocated or will advocate for a total ban. I do believe that every firearm purchase private or commercial should be done thru a dealer to ensure BG checks are done. I do believe a waiting period should be in place for purchase of a firearm. I do believe mag caps should be in place. I do believe yearly registering should be mandatory. I do believe mandatory safety training should be required. This would be a PITA but I would have no problem doing it and it would be well worth it if it saved just one life.

You are right in a sense. Firearms do not "cause" violence. They do however cause violence to escalate from hurts feelings or a bloody nose to be deadly.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
35. Nope. Going by the evidence provided is not an assumption.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 03:46 PM
Feb 2016
You make a lot of...Assumptions.


Nope. Going by the evidence provided is not an assumption. "Guns cause violence", "too many guns out there". "Registration". Those are the talking points of anti-gunners. If you don't want to be tied to them, don't use them.

Everyone here seen the "middling" act before, many many times, too.

I enjoy my firearms, all 5 of them. Pistols / Rifle/Shotgun. You can check my posting history. I have never said I "hate" firearms. I have never advocated or will advocate for a total ban.


And we have an anti-gun person who posts here and in the other forum who has an FFL. SO what? Theres a fine line between "I hate guns" and "My guns are Ok but everyone elses are a problem".

I do believe that every firearm purchase private or commercial should be done thru a dealer to ensure BG checks are done. I do believe a waiting period should be in place for purchase of a firearm. I do believe mag caps should be in place. I do believe yearly registering should be mandatory. I do believe mandatory safety training should be required.


Whether you own guns or not, you're batting for the other team with those talking points.

They do however cause violence to escalate from hurts feelings or a bloody nose to be deadly.


Again, no. The ONLY thing that causes violence to escalate is individuals making poor choices.






 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
28. Someone forgot to inform the citizens of Illinois, Minnesota, and Massachusetts...
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 12:48 AM
Feb 2016

...that they really don't like guns, as they are busily buying more and more of them.

The disinterested reader will note that two of those three states are heavily Democratic.

If you can't convince them that more restrictions on guns are necessary, how do you
propose to get your mooted regulations enacted in red states?

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
31. It will come about in the same...
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 08:17 AM
Feb 2016

Manner that much thought DUI / DWI laws did. For decades driving drunk was viewed no big deal. Cops used to drive some of my family member home if they got pulled over and were drunk. But that public view eventually changed and driving drunk was finally viewed as the seriously deadly issue it is and tougher laws/regulations were put on the books. The same is happening with firearms. A majority of people are in favor of background checks. People are also changing their view that the 3yr old who finds a firearm in the front room and kills themselves or another is not some sort of "tragic accident" but criminal negligence.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
32. Your analogy is inapt.
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 11:55 AM
Feb 2016

We did not try to mitigate drunk driving by more tightly regulating or limiting alcohol or cars.

We addressed drunk driving by more diligently enforcing the existing laws and increasing the penalties for the actually dangerous, already criminal conduct of drinking and driving and devoted substantial resources to educating people on the dangers of such conduct. The focus was on the criminals and their conduct, not inanimate objects.

Most gun rights supporters would support a similar paradigm with respect to firearms, i.e., increasing the penalties for the criminal misuse of firearms and increasing funding and resources for suicide prevention, firearm safety and training, safe storage incentives, etc.



 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
34. You conflate criminal misuse and lawful use
Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:43 PM
Feb 2016

You also seem not to have noticed that I have long advocated unversal background checks

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»America is no longer gun-...