Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Message auto-removed (Original Post) Name removed Nov 2018 OP
The problem is not that controls are punitives marylandblue Nov 2018 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2018 #2
NRA may have participated in gun control in the past marylandblue Nov 2018 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2018 #4
I prefer compromise, I see none on the other side marylandblue Nov 2018 #5
Post removed Post removed Nov 2018 #7
I didn't make compromise conditional, and nothing in my post would lead you to think that. marylandblue Nov 2018 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2018 #6

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
1. The problem is not that controls are punitives
Sun Nov 25, 2018, 02:45 PM
Nov 2018

The problem is that gun rights advocates are sold on the idea that the right to own guns is a 100% unlimited right that was always intended to be free of restrictions, costs, tracking, registrations, accountability measures, or any other type of thing that any gun right advocate might consider an "infringement." Never mind that there has never been any other unlimited right in all of human history, the founders gave us this one.

That's why both Amanpour and gun rights advocates agree that imposing a single, inconsequential limit is actually a big deal.

Response to marylandblue (Reply #1)

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
3. NRA may have participated in gun control in the past
Sun Nov 25, 2018, 03:12 PM
Nov 2018

But they are more radical than they used to be, and do in fact oppose all forms of gun control. This discussion has always been about firearms and always been understood not to include things like nerve gas. I am not aware of any movement on the conservative to enact anything that enjoys broad popular support, like universal background checks.

The NRA are okay with preventing felons from owning guns. But that's a long standing restriction that nobody is talking about changing. And it's in keeping with another long-standing conservative approach to felons -- restricting or eliminating their rights as much as possible, such as not restoring their voting rights.

Response to marylandblue (Reply #3)

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
5. I prefer compromise, I see none on the other side
Sun Nov 25, 2018, 03:50 PM
Nov 2018

Last edited Sun Nov 25, 2018, 04:41 PM - Edit history (2)

You are essentially saying the current NRA tactic not to compromise is a tactic to stymie legislation they don't like by not compromising. Well it works. Nothing has been done for years, despite certain laws being supported by the vast majority of the public. The one modest reform that made perfect sense and put in place by Obama was undone by Trump.

On edit: Fixed an accidental edit.

Response to marylandblue (Reply #5)

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
8. I didn't make compromise conditional, and nothing in my post would lead you to think that.
Sun Nov 25, 2018, 04:51 PM
Nov 2018

But you've basically said gun rights activists don't want to compromise and blame their behavior on liberals.

Response to Name removed (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Message auto-removed