Mon Apr 2, 2012, 01:18 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
Would publishing the personal information...
...of those with CC permits make the permits themselves an oxymoron?
|
178 replies, 59288 views
 178 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Would publishing the personal information... (Original post) |
discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | OP |
| Oneka | Apr 2012 | #1 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #2 | |
| Oneka | Apr 2012 | #6 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #7 | |
| Oneka | Apr 2012 | #8 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #9 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #25 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #30 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #55 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #61 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #3 | |
| Hoyt | Apr 2012 | #15 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #19 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #26 | |
| safeinOhio | Apr 2012 | #17 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #20 | |
| safeinOhio | Apr 2012 | #22 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #24 | |
| mvccd1000 | Apr 2012 | #28 | |
| safeinOhio | Apr 2012 | #29 | |
| mvccd1000 | Apr 2012 | #46 | |
| safeinOhio | Apr 2012 | #115 | |
| mvccd1000 | Apr 2012 | #124 | |
| safeinOhio | Apr 2012 | #125 | |
| mvccd1000 | Apr 2012 | #127 | |
| BiggJawn | Apr 2012 | #21 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #68 | |
| Clames | Apr 2012 | #126 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #132 | |
| Clames | Apr 2012 | #140 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #144 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #4 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #5 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #10 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #11 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #32 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #35 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #39 | |
| gejohnston | Apr 2012 | #41 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #44 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #52 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #63 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #69 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #75 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #79 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #93 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #95 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #97 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #112 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #117 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #119 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #66 | |
| GreenStormCloud | Apr 2012 | #122 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #130 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #47 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #53 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #76 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #80 | |
| eqfan592 | Apr 2012 | #90 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #91 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #94 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #96 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #98 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #102 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #106 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #12 | |
| Hoyt | Apr 2012 | #16 | |
| gejohnston | Apr 2012 | #18 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #33 | |
| gejohnston | Apr 2012 | #51 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #54 | |
| gejohnston | Apr 2012 | #60 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #62 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #64 | |
| gejohnston | Apr 2012 | #67 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #70 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #27 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #31 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #34 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #37 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #43 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #45 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #49 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #57 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #71 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #89 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #92 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #105 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #113 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #56 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #73 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #81 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #84 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #99 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #108 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #114 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #116 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #120 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #118 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #121 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #123 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #131 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #133 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #136 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #161 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #58 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #65 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #88 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #101 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #107 | |
| X_Digger | Apr 2012 | #109 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #110 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #111 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #48 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #78 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #23 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #36 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #42 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #164 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #165 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #38 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #40 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #50 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #74 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #82 | |
| rrneck | Apr 2012 | #85 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #87 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #103 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #129 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #135 | |
| gejohnston | Apr 2012 | #137 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #143 | |
| gejohnston | Apr 2012 | #152 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #156 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #163 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #139 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #142 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #147 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #148 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #154 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #158 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #159 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #149 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #155 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #145 | |
| X_Digger | Apr 2012 | #150 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #151 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #153 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #157 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #160 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #162 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Apr 2012 | #169 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #170 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Apr 2012 | #171 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #172 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Apr 2012 | #174 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #176 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Apr 2012 | #177 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #178 | |
| rl6214 | Apr 2012 | #59 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #72 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #77 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #83 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #86 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #104 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #128 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #134 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #138 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #141 | |
| Atypical Liberal | Apr 2012 | #146 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Apr 2012 | #166 | |
| bongbong | Apr 2012 | #167 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Apr 2012 | #168 | |
| Glassunion | Apr 2012 | #173 | |
| friendly_iconoclast | Apr 2012 | #175 | |
| Callisto32 | Apr 2012 | #13 | |
| discntnt_irny_srcsm | Apr 2012 | #14 | |
| Tuesday Afternoon | Apr 2012 | #100 |
Response to rl6214 (Reply #7)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:18 PM
9. WTF?
|
I will, after you translate "WTF?" into some form of English.
 |
Response to rl6214 (Reply #25)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 10:47 AM
30. Thanks
|
Now I can say, "You don't understand my post? WTF!!!"
(hint: if you're having problems, try searching for "republicans cause murder of Dr. Tiller", or "O'Reilly caused murder of Dr. Tiller"  |
Response to rl6214 (Reply #55)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:34 PM
61. SORRY!
|
I thought O'Liely was a well-known nick for O'Reilly (the king of clowns).
Seriously, don't jump down my throat and insult me ("post that in English" if you have a specific objection to my (or anybody's) posts. Specific is the key word here. Your reply to me was very non-specific in its tone. And if you give me something like that to play with, I'll have lots of fun!  |
Response to Oneka (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 02:13 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
3. I would suggest...
Response to Hoyt (Reply #15)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:24 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
19. Get a grip.
Response to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #3)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:23 PM
safeinOhio (31,156 posts)
17. It would seem to me that issuing
Response to safeinOhio (Reply #17)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:28 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
20. I lean toward all public actions being open to the public.
Response to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #20)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 09:28 PM
safeinOhio (31,156 posts)
22. Sure, I would think so.
Response to safeinOhio (Reply #22)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:07 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
24. we just don't agree there. n/t
Response to mvccd1000 (Reply #28)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 07:56 AM
safeinOhio (31,156 posts)
29. You don't vote?
Response to mvccd1000 (Reply #46)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 08:14 PM
safeinOhio (31,156 posts)
115. In my state and most others, of course there is a list
Response to safeinOhio (Reply #115)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:20 AM
124. And what good would you suggest that does?
Response to mvccd1000 (Reply #124)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:50 AM
safeinOhio (31,156 posts)
125. That is not the point.
Response to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #3)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 09:21 PM
21. I'm not worried about burglars.
Response to Clames (Reply #126)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 11:33 AM
132. ROFL
|
> Only magic here is your dancing strawman.
Oh, so now you're calling the documented facts of what happened to Tiller a "strawman". What a laugh! |
Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #4)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 03:09 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
5. If the public has a right to know who is carrying guns
Response to bongbong (Reply #10)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:53 PM
11. an Individual is a Member of the Militia. In order to be well regulated the Individual must have a
Response to bongbong (Reply #32)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:09 AM
35. excuse me -- are you saying that I am not well trained?
Response to gejohnston (Reply #41)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:36 AM
44. OK but, does this mean that one is not well regulated if one can not produce papers from a
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #75)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 02:45 PM
79. Really?
|
I'm glad you're in favor of self-judged standards. I'm a brain surgeon (as assessed by myself), and I hope I have a chance to fix your brain tumor.
You need to go take another hit of meth. |
Response to bongbong (Reply #69)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 04:29 PM
93. in the immortal words of jpak...you are wrong. yup
Response to bongbong (Reply #95)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 05:23 PM
97. I am a well regulated militia of One.
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #97)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 08:09 PM
112. Yawn part 543,638
|
Your self-proclamations are worthless. If you really believe in them, are you ready for me to operate on your brain tumor? I am the GREATEST brain surgeon in history!
|
Response to GreenStormCloud (Reply #122)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 11:28 AM
130. What a laugh!
|
You think I write laws?
|
Response to bongbong (Reply #32)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:51 AM
47. that needs to be further discussed and refined, imo.... still, did you forget to produce your
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #76)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 02:46 PM
80. Go do another hit of meth, dude.
|
|
Response to bongbong (Reply #80)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 03:57 PM
90. Thanks for establishing how completely you missed the point.
|
|
Response to eqfan592 (Reply #90)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 04:07 PM
91. Thanks
|
Right back at you, ace. I see you missed the point!
|
Response to bongbong (Reply #80)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 04:32 PM
94. that is some stretch you have there
|
easy to see how I go from bongbong to the obvious bong hits analogy . . .
but, how you got from to Tuesday Afternoon to a meth reference . . . 
I am beginning to understand how your reading comprhension skills (or lack thereof) work. No wonder you have the Constitution and the Federalist Papers so conflated.  |
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #94)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 05:21 PM
96. Yawn-o
|
> asy to see how I go from bongbong to the obvious bong hits analogy
Oh, the word "bong" doesn't mean anything but "bong hits"? You should probably buy a dictionary. > t, how you got from to Tuesday Afternoon to a meth reference Just as easy as the spurious connection between "bongbong" and "bong hits". Meth is consumed by many people on Tuesday afternoon. > I am beginning to understand how your reading comprhension skills (or lack thereof) work. And I am seeing how gun-lovers usually end up with personal insults after their NRA Talking Points are debunked. > No wonder you have the Constitution and the Federalist Papers so conflated. More mind-reading. Show me a post of mine where I equate them, other than to say the Founding Fathers were involved with the writing of both. Your score: Zero for 4. Can you have the NRA send out better debaters? |
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #98)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 05:34 PM
102. Hmmm
|
"Masterbater"!
WOW THAT IS A SERIOUSLY FUNNY QUIP! |
Response to bongbong (Reply #10)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:00 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
12. That's too bad...
Response to bongbong (Reply #62)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:43 PM
67. get a double refund where you learned
Response to Hoyt (Reply #16)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:30 PM
27. "the pro-guns-in-every-corner-of-society-culture"
|
You wanna point everyone to where we can learn about that culture or is this just another of your made up societies you like to bloviate about on the internet?
Only ones I ever see say anything about guns in every corner of society are you anti-gun zealots |
Response to rl6214 (Reply #27)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 10:50 AM
31. I love it!
|
> you anti-gun zealots
Yeah, asking for non-insane gun control laws and limits on gun ownership is "anti-gun zealotry".
I still don't know why, using the NRA re-definition of the 2nd Amendment, I can't own flame-throwers, tanks, nukes, jet fighters, etc. When, oh when, will the NRA REALLY start sticking up for the 2nd Amendment? (  since you pro-gun zealots won't get it)
The NRA are a bunch of traitors to the 2nd Amendment! |
Response to bongbong (Reply #31)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:00 AM
34. Are members of a militia "people"? nt
Response to rrneck (Reply #43)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:38 AM
45. As a well regulated Individaul, is it wrong to consider oneself a
Response to rl6214 (Reply #89)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 04:09 PM
92. Nah Nah!
|
> Can't do it, can you?
Nah Nah, yes I can! http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed29.htm |
Response to rrneck (Reply #108)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 08:12 PM
114. Yep
|
And my point has long been made too, that the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with laissez-faire gun ownership.
In fact, my point was made many decades before I was born! |
Response to bongbong (Reply #114)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 08:17 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
116. Actually it's rather simple:
Response to bongbong (Reply #131)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 11:44 AM
133. Awwww....
|
Can't stand getting busted.
|
Response to rrneck (Reply #133)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:13 PM
136. Yawn againT
|
That wasn't very entertaining. Don't you have a few dozen "BRAND NEW! GUARANTIED TO SHOOT DOWN THE OPPOSITION!" Talking Points from the NRA to parrot?
|
Response to rl6214 (Reply #58)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:42 PM
65. Really?
|
> Learn what bearing arms really means
Oh, you mean like the under-10 pound Panzerfaust?
Why isn't the NRA DEMANDING our rights to own RPGs??? Even 70 year old RPG technology fits the NRA-approved version of the 2nd Amendment! |
Response to rl6214 (Reply #88)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 05:26 PM
101. OK
|
Oh, that's a good one. So that also means that only muskets can be sold these days.
Don't you hate it when you contradict yourself? |
Response to rl6214 (Reply #107)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 07:09 PM
109. If he did, he wouldn't do it so much.
Response to X_Digger (Reply #109)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 07:21 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
110. +1 n/t
Response to rl6214 (Reply #107)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 08:05 PM
111. You're still losing
|
> No, it's commonly accepted that the foot soldier carries the modern weapon of THE FOOT SOLDIER
You mean like most of the German Army carried by hand after Jan 1945 - the Panzerfaust RPG? |
Response to bongbong (Reply #10)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 09:29 PM
23. Are members of the militia "people"? nt
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #36)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:30 AM
42. Kinda nice to hear sometimes.
Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #36)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 03:11 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
164. and a day later...
|
...you can still hear them...
I find it's quite restful. It's almost peaceful.  |
Response to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #164)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 03:14 PM
165. love it, sitting on my porch, sipping on a mint julep and listening to:
Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #129)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:11 PM
135. reply
|
Per your post, if the militia no longer exists, then the 2nd Amendment has NO meaning anymore. IOW, the 2nd Amendment can't be used as a defense for laissez-faire gun ownership.
Steven's minority decision in the infamous Heller case (radical activist conservative judges overturning precedent) pointed this out most succinctly. Most of the gun-adorers in this thread have let my clearly- and repeatedly-posted point fly right over their heads in their rush to judgement: The 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with laissez-faire gun ownership. There, I said it again, maybe for the 10th time. Hopefully some of you will read it this time. If somebody can show me a post of mine that says that guns should be outlawed, feel free. You won't be able to find one, except in your fervid imaginations. |
Response to gejohnston (Reply #137)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:43 PM
143. You call it potato
|
And the rest of the world calls it "laissez-faire gun ownership". The number, and strictness, of laws in any other country (except Somalia and a few other libertarian "paradises"
dwarfs the laws we have here. |
Response to bongbong (Reply #143)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 03:04 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
163. the rest of the world
Response to bongbong (Reply #135)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:38 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
139. A simple question
Response to bongbong (Reply #142)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:53 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
147. Okay
Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #149)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 01:20 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
155. I can wait.
Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #145)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 12:58 PM
150. Don't expect a cogent response..
Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #169)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 08:33 PM
170. asdf
|
> It's clear why expanded gun control has moved in the direction it has in recent years- just look at the level of
If you show me where I advocated greater gun control, let me know. Just put the post number where I advocated for it. Fervid imaginations running wild! |
Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #171)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 11:47 AM
172. Really?
|
> attracted many a never-published, never-admitted-to-the-bar self-proclaimed "Constitutional scholar".
Show me where I said I was never admitted to the bar, or where I proclaimed myself a "Constitutional scholar". I'll wait for your reply. Secondly, if you want to find a list of people who think the NRA is wrong and are more or less expected to be "Constitutional scholars", you can start with Justice Steven's dissent to Heller. Then you can look up the thousands of articles written by law professors opposing NRA re-writes of the Constitution. |
Response to rl6214 (Reply #59)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:57 PM
72. FAIL!
|
Federalist Paper #29 was published centuries ago. Try to keep up with current events!
|
Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #86)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 05:40 PM
104. Interesting
|
> The second amendment is about enumerating the right of the people to keep and bear military-grade small arms suitable for infantry use, to be used to kill people who threaten the security of free states, and, by extension, themselves.
Wow! Which Founding Father wrote that? I especially like the "military-grade" phrase. Sounds like the "Founding Father" Nathanial Robert Allen (NRA to his friends) wrote that one. |
Response to Atypical Liberal (Reply #128)
Wed Apr 4, 2012, 11:54 AM
134. I've done the research
|
And my research, including detailed historical accounts of the period from Articles Of Confederation to the writing of the Constitution, and the political deals that were made, and the colonial mindset among the "common" people, and the many tax revolts of that time, and the anti- and pro-Federalism, and the various letters between the Founding Fathers ...., well, the subject list I've covered is quite extensive.
After reading literally dozens of books by noted and not-so-noted historians on the subject, my conclusions of what the Founding Fathers intended is diametrically opposite from the pseudo-history & lies the NRA pumps out. I've already demonstrated on this thread, and been the victim of, the fact that when people run out of NRA Talking Points they resort to personal insults. My work here is done.  |
Response to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #168)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 01:05 PM
173. The NRA Imagines Constitution To Be
|
Any gun, anywhere, any time for everyone shall not be infringed... Cold dead hands, go Tebow and God Bless 'Merica...
 |
Response to Callisto32 (Reply #13)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:12 PM
discntnt_irny_srcsm (18,334 posts)
14. Cool
|
but how is that relevant?
|
Response to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #14)
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 05:26 PM
100. huge hands, large arms
|
Big Guns
 |
