Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
Mon May 7, 2012, 07:13 PM May 2012

Warriors and sportsmen

One of my favorite stories in the world of shooting is from the 1912 Olympics. That year a young lieutenant from the US Army finished fifth in the first Olympic modern pentathlon. His name was George S. Patton.


The pentathlon included: Pistol shooting, 300 meter freestyle swimming, Fencing, Equestrian cross-country steeplechase and a Four kilometer cross-country foot race. Patton placed 21st in pistol shooting, sixth in swimming, and third in each of the other events. If not for the poor placement in shooting, Patton may have won the gold. His shooting score was probably an error. Out of 20 scored shots, more than half were bulls-eyes. The remaining shots were between 7 and 9 out of a possible 10 except for two. One of Patton's four groupings was so tight that two shots were ruled as complete misses. I feel that's highly unlikely.


Patton's reaction after the event:

"...the high spirit of sportsmanship and generosity manifested throughout speaks volumes for the character of the officers of the present day.

There was not a single incident of a protest or any unsportsmanlike quibbling or fighting for points which I regret to say marred some of the other civilian competitions at the Olympic Games.

Each man did his best and took what fortune sent like a true soldier, and at the end we all felt more like good friends and comrades than rivals in a severe competition, yet this spirit of friendship in no manner detracted from the zeal with which all strove for success."



Today, 100 years later, another man revealed his character in what he didn't say. Mitt Romney failed to correct some demented individual when she accused President Obama of treason. Both of these men are definitely characters, but only one actually had any character.
55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warriors and sportsmen (Original Post) discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 OP
How about this one, from the 1921 National Matches. oneshooter May 2012 #1
A great story :) discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #2
He set a record that hasn't been tied, much less broken. oneshooter May 2012 #30
Don't forget... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #35
I picked up the name... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #15
So are the majority of gun nuts going to turn out for Mitt Romney? ellisonz May 2012 #3
Sure. He's lifetime NRA, dontcha know? TheCowsCameHome May 2012 #4
What does that say about their character? n/t ellisonz May 2012 #8
He got his lifetime membership in 2006 ... spin May 2012 #12
That's correct. TheCowsCameHome May 2012 #26
He actually has admitted that what you posted is right ... spin May 2012 #36
Why would any gun owner believe that Romney was more pro-gun than Obama? spin May 2012 #11
The Saturday before elections... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #17
Patton was a racist - who cares how good he supposedly was at target shooting? Hoyt May 2012 #5
Really Meiko May 2012 #10
Check it out -- Google is your friend, as they tell me. Hoyt May 2012 #14
I will Meiko May 2012 #40
Interesting Meiko May 2012 #42
"Patton hated everyone" - LOL. Come to think of it, assholes should be prohibited from owning guns. Hoyt May 2012 #45
Is there a rider that says gejohnston May 2012 #47
So when are you turning in yours? Clames May 2012 #51
And of course we're all free of moribund prejudices Glaug-Eldare May 2012 #13
He was just another guy who might have been a Zimmerman w/o war. Hoyt May 2012 #16
Nope sarisataka May 2012 #19
He's also supposed to have Rittermeister May 2012 #20
And yet again you show your ignorance Lurks Often May 2012 #41
Hoyt excels at showing both his ignorance and his biases. oneshooter May 2012 #43
Excels at it? Clames May 2012 #52
I've always been fascinated by the personality type Simo 1939_1940 May 2012 #53
Who didn't love Patton, what a great American hero. ileus May 2012 #6
Allied High Command ellisonz May 2012 #7
Probably had a few screws loose Rittermeister May 2012 #9
Patton was a complete sarisataka May 2012 #22
"Patton was a complete Prima Donna and probably had more than a few loose screws." oneshooter May 2012 #25
Patton was cavalry, and Montgomery was infantry, in philosphy. PavePusher May 2012 #27
The British also had a wholly different set of problems Rittermeister May 2012 #29
Reminds me of a story... jeepnstein May 2012 #31
Squares with my understanding Rittermeister May 2012 #32
Old Jim said... jeepnstein May 2012 #33
I'm supposed to be going to talk to a local fellow Rittermeister May 2012 #34
Don't get me going on Monty sarisataka May 2012 #38
He made a comment in his diary after the war Rittermeister May 2012 #28
I find some of that difficult to believe sarisataka May 2012 #39
He wouldn't be the first consummate soldier to flounder in peacetime Rittermeister May 2012 #46
Agreement there sarisataka May 2012 #48
It would have been blowhards talking. GreenStormCloud May 2012 #37
well you have to admit the German High Command had no love for him either. oneshooter May 2012 #44
The that the high command... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2012 #18
Patton was an authoritarian asshole... Callisto32 May 2012 #21
Only he wasn't in charge Lurks Often May 2012 #54
He gave my old man a ticket in N Africa for no necktie. era veteran May 2012 #23
I take it your old man was an officer? sarisataka May 2012 #24
Yes, went to OCS in '39 or '40 era veteran May 2012 #49
Real horse soldier, huh? Rittermeister May 2012 #50
LOL, yet era veteran May 2012 #55

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
30. He set a record that hasn't been tied, much less broken.
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:23 AM
May 2012

All at the age of 62, using a issue rifle and issue ammunition. With half of a set of opera glasses(4X) as a spotting scope.

Oneshooter
Armed and Livin in Texas

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
15. I picked up the name...
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:28 PM
May 2012

...Frankford Arsenal during my second read. It was located in my home town of Philadelphia. After the Frankford Arsenal closed the property was repurposed. It leases space to schools and businesses. My daughters went to school there.

spin

(17,493 posts)
12. He got his lifetime membership in 2006 ...
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:18 PM
May 2012

As he was considering his first presidential run in 2006, Romney signed up for a lifetime NRA membership.
http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2012/04/13/romney-and-the-nra/

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
26. That's correct.
Tue May 8, 2012, 08:55 AM
May 2012

And I doubt if he knows which end of a gun to hold.

He's a shameless, pandering whore.......

spin

(17,493 posts)
36. He actually has admitted that what you posted is right ...
Tue May 8, 2012, 12:32 PM
May 2012



Wooing Southerners,Monday Mitt Romney praises grits but admits he’s not much of a hunter

March 12th, 2012

by: CHARLES BABINGTON , Associated Press

MOBILE, Ala. – Wealthy New Englander Mitt Romney is trying to woo Southern voters with a mix of regional references that sometimes show self-deprecating humor, and sometimes are just plain awkward.

The GOP presidential contender admits that campaigning in Alabama, Mississippi and other Southern states is “a bit of an away game” for him. Unlike Kansas, however, he’s campaigning hard in those states, hoping essentially to tie or even steal a victory from more conservative rivals Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich.

***snip***

Moments later, he showed good-natured self-awareness, saying he hoped to go hunting with an Alabama friend who “can actually show me which end of the rifle to point.” The audience, crammed under an awning for protection from the storm, laughed with appreciation.emphasis added

The former Massachusetts governor was mocked during his 2008 presidential bid for claiming he sometimes hunts “small varmints.” GOP candidates rarely refer to firearms without extolling the need to protect gun-owners’ rights.
http://www.firearmstoday.com/2012/03/12/wooing-southerners-mitt-romney-praises-grits-but-admits-hes-not-much-of-a-hunter/

spin

(17,493 posts)
11. Why would any gun owner believe that Romney was more pro-gun than Obama?
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:11 PM
May 2012
Political positions of Mitt Romney

***snip***

Gun ownership

Romney has said "I support the right of individuals to keep and bear arms as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution,"[181] though in past campaigns he has described himself as a proponent of gun control, and he fully supports a ban on assault weapons.[182]

Romney made several statements in his 2008 campaign regarding his proficiency with and support for firearms:

"I've hunted a number of times, of various types of small rodents."[187][citation needed]

"Shooting rabbits single shot 22 is pretty hard."[188]

"I have a gun of my own. I go hunting myself. I'm a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms. In our state . . . there are a series of laws restricting gun ownership in various ways. Over the past four years, I've worked very closely with the Gun Owners' Action League here, which is an affiliate of the NRA, and we've made some changes which I think they feel have been positive steps. And so you are going to see that, I think, hopefully, in other states as well, as they make progress, perhaps further than Massachusetts has."[183]

"So I'm a hunter and believe in Second Amendment rights, but I also believe that assault weapons are not needed in the public population."[189]


Romney later clarified that he did not 'own' a gun and said that one of his sons keeps two guns at the family vacation home in Utah.[185]

The Associated Press reported in April 2007 that Romney never sought a hunting license in any of the four states where he has resided. Romney replied by saying that he mainly hunts small game in Utah, which does not require a license.[190]
emphasis added
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Mitt_Romney#Gun_ownership



discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
17. The Saturday before elections...
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:33 PM
May 2012

...the Gun Nut Gazette notifies all gun nuts who to vote for and whether to even vote at all. We just do whatever we're told by management.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
42. Interesting
Tue May 8, 2012, 03:54 PM
May 2012
http://www.wikipedia.org/

Seems to me he hated everyone.

Attitudes on race and nationality
Patton's attitude toward minorities varied depending on time and circumstance, with military necessity being of particular importance.
On black soldiers: "Individually they were good soldiers, but I expressed my belief at the time, and have never found the necessity of changing it, that a colored soldier cannot think fast enough to fight in armor."[111]


Patton stated that performance was more important than race or religious affiliation:[112] "I don't give a damn who the man is. He can be a nigger or a Jew, but if he has the stuff and does his duty, he can have anything I've got. By God! I love him."[112][113]
Later, Patton addressed a group of African-American tankers, saying:

Men, you're the first Negro tankers to ever fight in the American Army. I would never have asked for you if you weren't good. I have nothing but the best in my Army. I don't care what color you are as long as you go up there and kill those Kraut sons of bitches. Everyone has their eyes on you and is expecting great things from you. Most of all your race is looking forward to you. Don't let them down and damn you, don't let me down![114]
Patton also insisted on the assignment of some black officers as judges in military tribunals involving black defendants,[112] and he spent more time with his African-American aide, Sergeant Meeks, than with nearly anyone else while in Europe,[112] developing a relationship of mutual respect that transcended that of a general with his valet.


Patton disliked the British,[112] but appreciated Montgomery's organizational abilities more than either Eisenhower or Bradley did.[112]
Patton was horrified at what he found when his Third Army liberated Buchenwald concentration camp. Local German citizens claimed that they didn't know what was going on, though at least a few admitted to knowing of the atrocities but insisted they had been powerless to stop it. He ordered American troops to round up the approximately 2,000 local Germans and march them through the camps so they could see the atrocities firsthand.


Though many of his attitudes were common in his day, as with all of his opinions, he was often exceptionally blunt in his expression of them. He once wrote:
The difficulty in understanding the Russian is that we do not take cognizance of the fact that he is not a European, but an Asiatic, and therefore thinks deviously. We can no more understand a Russian than a Chinese or a Japanese, and from what I have seen of them, I have no particular desire to understand them except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them. In addition to his other amiable characteristics, the Russian has no regard for human life and they are all out sons-of-bitches, barbarians, and chronic drunks.[115]


After reading the Koran and observing North Africans, he wrote to his wife, "Just finished reading the Koran – a good book and interesting." Patton had a keen eye for native customs and methods, wrote knowingly of local architecture, even rated the progress of word-of-mouth rumor in Arab country at 40–60 miles (64–97 km) a day. In spite of his regard for the Koran, he concluded, "To me it seems certain that the fatalistic teachings of Mohammad and the utter degradation of women is the outstanding cause for the arrested development of the Arab. . . . Here, I think, is a text for some eloquent sermon on the virtues of Christianity."[116][117]
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
45. "Patton hated everyone" - LOL. Come to think of it, assholes should be prohibited from owning guns.
Tue May 8, 2012, 06:13 PM
May 2012

I'd like to see some progressive Congressperson introduce legislation that assholes can't have guns. That would definitely get rid of a big chunk of gun owners.

We've found an interim step to removing guns in this country. Call it the "Patton Law."

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
47. Is there a rider that says
Tue May 8, 2012, 09:22 PM
May 2012

Ted Nugent and Don Trump have to give me theirs? Somebody else can have Cheney's and Wayne's.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
51. So when are you turning in yours?
Wed May 9, 2012, 05:35 PM
May 2012

Of course that type of legislation is exactly the opposite of what a progressive person would ask for, I'm not surprised that you would champion it.

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
13. And of course we're all free of moribund prejudices
Mon May 7, 2012, 10:26 PM
May 2012

We've finally reached that stage of perfection where none of our attitudes will ever be regarded as naive, bigoted, baseless, or just plain dumb. LBJ was a racist, too, so we should probably get rid of the tainted Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and all of the viciously racist Great Society programs. First amendment was passed by a bunch of slave-owners, so let's ditch that, same with the Fourth and Fifth... Time for an audit to get rid of everything that was accomplished before we became perfect. Wait...

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
19. Nope
Tue May 8, 2012, 12:08 AM
May 2012

He held them at gunpoint until everything was sorted out. No one was shot.

I will leave it to you and google to find the rest of the story.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
20. He's also supposed to have
Tue May 8, 2012, 02:12 AM
May 2012

strapped dead Mexicans to the side of his field car, an act which supposedly shocked Black Jack Pershing, his superior at the time. When talking about Patton, it's kind of important to remember that he was born in the 1880s, and raised by exiled southern aristocrats. He was very 19th century in his outlook, in ways good and bad. On the other hand, if we judge every historical figure, nobody born before 1900 is going to come up looking great. Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, Lincoln had some racist tendencies, Marx and Engels had some seriously whacko ideas on history and biology, etc.

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
41. And yet again you show your ignorance
Tue May 8, 2012, 03:50 PM
May 2012

Sgt. William George Meeks was George Patton's personal orderly all through WWII and was one of the pallbearers at Patton's funeral. Every time Patton received a promotion, Sgt Meeks did as well, ending up as a Master Sergeant, the highest NCO rank in the US Army during that time period. M/Sgt Meeks went everywhere with Patton, including on leave and probably spent as much, if not more, time with Patton then anybody else during WWII. M/Sgt Meeks was African-American.

Sgt Thue P. Lee was Patton's personal cook from the time Patton landed in North Africa until Patton's death, Sgt Lee was Chinese-American

If Patton was such a racist, why did he allow these men to serve directly under him? As a general he could have easily had them transferred and certainly his wife would never had allowed M/Sgt Meeks to serve as a pallbearer if race was an issue to Patton.

Patton's views on race seemed to be consistent with society's views at the time and I base this on 20+ years of studying Patton and reading more then a dozen books about him.



Simo 1939_1940

(768 posts)
53. I've always been fascinated by the personality type
Thu May 10, 2012, 01:29 AM
May 2012

that lives to flaunt their ignorance. A relatively rare breed, but certainly a most amusing one.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
6. Who didn't love Patton, what a great American hero.
Mon May 7, 2012, 08:47 PM
May 2012

The fact that he was a good target shooter is cream on top of it all.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
9. Probably had a few screws loose
Mon May 7, 2012, 08:51 PM
May 2012

Somewhat overrated. The movie was pretty blatant hagiography. His personal beliefs were about a century out of date: rejecting mental illness as cowardice, views on race and religion, etc. Pretty decent field commander.

FYI, I have it on fairly good authority that after the slapping incidents got out, there was some talk of jumping Patton if he came to a certain hospital.

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
22. Patton was a complete
Tue May 8, 2012, 08:27 AM
May 2012

Prima Donna and probably had more than a few loose screws.

His personal beliefs however were fairly standard for the time. Racism was rampant in the military; if anything Patton was more progressive than his contemporaries in regards to race.

After the incidents with shell shocked soldiers, Patton took it upon himself to learn about the issue. Later in the war his command had some of the best treatment of soldiers who suffered from mental issues.

As for overrated- Eisenhower listed Patton as the third best American General ranked low only due to Ike's views on Patton's operational planning ability

"George Patton was the most brilliant commander of an army in the open field that our or any other service produced. But his army was part of a whole organization and his operations part of a great campaign."

or
In an interview conducted for Stars and Stripes just after his capture, Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt summed up the predominant German view of the American general: "Patton," Rundstedt concluded simply, "he is your best."

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
25. "Patton was a complete Prima Donna and probably had more than a few loose screws."
Tue May 8, 2012, 08:55 AM
May 2012

No more of a prima donna than Montgomery was. And some would argue that both had a "few loose screws". Both excelled in what they did, and neither liked the other very much.
There was a basic difference in style. Monty would gather a huge amount of men and material before launching an overwhelming attack. Patton was a hack and slash commander. Able to hit the enemy where he was weakest and roll over him with armored forces.

Both worked well.

Oneshooter

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
27. Patton was cavalry, and Montgomery was infantry, in philosphy.
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:06 AM
May 2012

Or at least that's what I've come to believe.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
29. The British also had a wholly different set of problems
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:17 AM
May 2012

By the time Montgomery really got into power, the word was out from the British government to minimize casualties at all costs. They'd already lost a lot, even by '43. There's also been some conjecture that a number of the troops, who had been fighting since 1940, were showing signs of PTSD. Veteran British armored units performed somewhat listlessly in the Normandy campaign around Caen.

jeepnstein

(2,631 posts)
31. Reminds me of a story...
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:21 AM
May 2012

an old vet told me once. He was in the Normandy invasion but in one of the later waves. He said that the British troops were "off" as he put it. As an example he described in great detail an atrocity a group of them committed against a German prisoner because their tea kettle got blown up. They built their fire on top of a bit of unexploded ordnance. He said the British men were already spent by the time they got to Normandy and everything they did took longer because of it. By comparison the Americans hadn't really experienced war the way the British had and seemed more eager. His observation was that once the British made it to the fight they were merciless in ways that kind of shocked him at times.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
32. Squares with my understanding
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:36 AM
May 2012

400,000 dead is a fair bit bigger chunk out of a nation of 40,000,000 than a nation of 130,000,000.

jeepnstein

(2,631 posts)
33. Old Jim said...
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:42 AM
May 2012

it was all the bombing. Even when they were in their rear area they were at war. They were losing family members, homes, and were under the cloud of invasion. Then along came the Americans with their "can do" attitude and this really pissed them off quite a bit.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
34. I'm supposed to be going to talk to a local fellow
Tue May 8, 2012, 11:48 AM
May 2012

Was in it from Torch through Italy before he got hit. Supposedly had some readjustment problems - couldn't sleep in the same bed with his wife because he kept waking up in the middle of the night and thinking she was trying to kill him.

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
38. Don't get me going on Monty
Tue May 8, 2012, 03:25 PM
May 2012

Although I have discovered he and Patton had mutual respect for the others abilities. Their personal rivalry never let them admit it to each other.

Their styles of warfare are still debated today. Which is better, attrition until you can launch an overwhelming attack or the blitzkrieg thrust before your opponent can muster a defense. The answer I think is whatever works in the particular situation. American style warfare relying on high tech and mechanized mobility, even in WW2, tends to favor the fast offensive.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
28. He made a comment in his diary after the war
Tue May 8, 2012, 10:14 AM
May 2012

when he was military governor of Bavaria? Something like that? Anyway, it was in regards to displaced persons - refugees and ex-concentration camp prisoners, Jews, etc.

Others might “believe that the Displaced Person is a human being,” Patton wrote, but he knew “he is not.” In particular, he whispered to his diary, the Jews “are lower than animals.”

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
39. I find some of that difficult to believe
Tue May 8, 2012, 03:34 PM
May 2012

He did seem to have some anti-Semitic tendencies but,

Patton was horrified at what he found when his Third Army liberated Buchenwald concentration camp. Local German citizens claimed that they didn't know what was going on, though at least a few admitted to knowing of the atrocities but insisted they had been powerless to stop it. He ordered American troops to round up the approximately 2,000 local Germans and march them through the camps so they could see the atrocities firsthand.


He also faced criticism for opposing denazification and advocating dealing with the Soviets as a new enemy instead of ally.

Post war he did show signs of depression and erratic behavior. It is questioned if he was suffering from traumatic brain injury, though I have not found a reference to when/how he received a head injury.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
46. He wouldn't be the first consummate soldier to flounder in peacetime
Tue May 8, 2012, 09:13 PM
May 2012

That's at least partially how the Nazis got into power - tons of unemployed soldiers on the streets, unable to transition back to civilian life. As I recall, the second-highest ace of WWI ended up running half the Luftwaffe under Goering.

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
48. Agreement there
Tue May 8, 2012, 09:31 PM
May 2012

Patton had the political savvy of an irritated badger but without the same restraint. He also had the filter between his brain and mouth removed

Nevertheless, he was exactly the General that was needed for that war. If it wasn't for him at the Bulge, the war in Europe could have been extended for six months to a year and it is very doubtful anyone else could have pivoted an entire amry to change the axis of attack like he did.



Callisto32

(2,997 posts)
21. Patton was an authoritarian asshole...
Tue May 8, 2012, 06:47 AM
May 2012

willing to shoot "his own men" for having that gall to demand that the .gov actually keep its contracts.

I don't care what he had to say about character as he proved his own to be brutish.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army

 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
54. Only he wasn't in charge
Thu May 10, 2012, 11:18 AM
May 2012

Hoover gave the order to MacArthur, who gave the order to Patton's commanding officer, who gave the order to the troops under his command (3rd Cavalry Regt).

Blame should be placed on Hoover and MacArthur, although the troops were only called in when the police could not longer control the crowds and the protests turned violent.

era veteran

(4,069 posts)
23. He gave my old man a ticket in N Africa for no necktie.
Tue May 8, 2012, 08:27 AM
May 2012

The racist stuff is bullshit. Damn near all white people were racists then. They just did not know it.
He was a great field commander with vision and drive. His abilities shortened the war, kept American (and German) deaths down and had a pragmatic sense of the immediate future politic.
As a tanker and the son of one I am glad he was on our side.

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)
24. I take it your old man was an officer?
Tue May 8, 2012, 08:29 AM
May 2012

Patton was notoriously strict on the appearance of his officers and very lenient in the treatment of front line enlisted

era veteran

(4,069 posts)
49. Yes, went to OCS in '39 or '40
Wed May 9, 2012, 11:07 AM
May 2012

Left a horse cav unit at Ft Riley.
Lots of changes in a couple of generations.
Dad never bitched about it, he was proud of it. He was wounded soon after. Went to England to get ready for the invasion and recuperate.

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
50. Real horse soldier, huh?
Wed May 9, 2012, 11:11 AM
May 2012

My great granddad was in WWI in the Meuse-Argonne. Only member of my family to ever almost lose a thumb in a bayonet fight. . .yet.

era veteran

(4,069 posts)
55. LOL, yet
Thu May 10, 2012, 11:33 AM
May 2012

Kept a log book on horses the same as done on all vehicles.
The old man lived through N Africa, Hedgerows, Hurtgen Forrest but the worst was 25 November 1950.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Warriors and sportsmen