Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumWarriors and sportsmen
One of my favorite stories in the world of shooting is from the 1912 Olympics. That year a young lieutenant from the US Army finished fifth in the first Olympic modern pentathlon. His name was George S. Patton.
The pentathlon included: Pistol shooting, 300 meter freestyle swimming, Fencing, Equestrian cross-country steeplechase and a Four kilometer cross-country foot race. Patton placed 21st in pistol shooting, sixth in swimming, and third in each of the other events. If not for the poor placement in shooting, Patton may have won the gold. His shooting score was probably an error. Out of 20 scored shots, more than half were bulls-eyes. The remaining shots were between 7 and 9 out of a possible 10 except for two. One of Patton's four groupings was so tight that two shots were ruled as complete misses. I feel that's highly unlikely.
Patton's reaction after the event:
There was not a single incident of a protest or any unsportsmanlike quibbling or fighting for points which I regret to say marred some of the other civilian competitions at the Olympic Games.
Each man did his best and took what fortune sent like a true soldier, and at the end we all felt more like good friends and comrades than rivals in a severe competition, yet this spirit of friendship in no manner detracted from the zeal with which all strove for success."
Today, 100 years later, another man revealed his character in what he didn't say. Mitt Romney failed to correct some demented individual when she accused President Obama of treason. Both of these men are definitely characters, but only one actually had any character.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)The story of 62yr old George R. Farr, and a 1000yd match.
Oneshooter
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)All at the age of 62, using a issue rifle and issue ammunition. With half of a set of opera glasses(4X) as a spotting scope.
Oneshooter
Armed and Livin in Texas
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...iron sights and not in especially good light.
Again, a great story!
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...Frankford Arsenal during my second read. It was located in my home town of Philadelphia. After the Frankford Arsenal closed the property was repurposed. It leases space to schools and businesses. My daughters went to school there.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)And he's a (R) on top of that.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)
As he was considering his first presidential run in 2006, Romney signed up for a lifetime NRA membership.
http://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2012/04/13/romney-and-the-nra/
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)And I doubt if he knows which end of a gun to hold.
He's a shameless, pandering whore.......
spin
(17,493 posts)
Wooing Southerners,Monday Mitt Romney praises grits but admits hes not much of a hunter
March 12th, 2012
by: CHARLES BABINGTON , Associated Press
MOBILE, Ala. Wealthy New Englander Mitt Romney is trying to woo Southern voters with a mix of regional references that sometimes show self-deprecating humor, and sometimes are just plain awkward.
The GOP presidential contender admits that campaigning in Alabama, Mississippi and other Southern states is a bit of an away game for him. Unlike Kansas, however, hes campaigning hard in those states, hoping essentially to tie or even steal a victory from more conservative rivals Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich.
***snip***
Moments later, he showed good-natured self-awareness, saying he hoped to go hunting with an Alabama friend who can actually show me which end of the rifle to point. The audience, crammed under an awning for protection from the storm, laughed with appreciation.emphasis added
The former Massachusetts governor was mocked during his 2008 presidential bid for claiming he sometimes hunts small varmints. GOP candidates rarely refer to firearms without extolling the need to protect gun-owners rights.
http://www.firearmstoday.com/2012/03/12/wooing-southerners-mitt-romney-praises-grits-but-admits-hes-not-much-of-a-hunter/
spin
(17,493 posts)Political positions of Mitt Romney
***snip***
Gun ownership
Romney has said "I support the right of individuals to keep and bear arms as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution,"[181] though in past campaigns he has described himself as a proponent of gun control, and he fully supports a ban on assault weapons.[182]
Romney made several statements in his 2008 campaign regarding his proficiency with and support for firearms:"I've hunted a number of times, of various types of small rodents."[187][citation needed]
"Shooting rabbits single shot 22 is pretty hard."[188]
"I have a gun of my own. I go hunting myself. I'm a member of the NRA and believe firmly in the right to bear arms. In our state . . . there are a series of laws restricting gun ownership in various ways. Over the past four years, I've worked very closely with the Gun Owners' Action League here, which is an affiliate of the NRA, and we've made some changes which I think they feel have been positive steps. And so you are going to see that, I think, hopefully, in other states as well, as they make progress, perhaps further than Massachusetts has."[183]
"So I'm a hunter and believe in Second Amendment rights, but I also believe that assault weapons are not needed in the public population."[189]
Romney later clarified that he did not 'own' a gun and said that one of his sons keeps two guns at the family vacation home in Utah.[185]
The Associated Press reported in April 2007 that Romney never sought a hunting license in any of the four states where he has resided. Romney replied by saying that he mainly hunts small game in Utah, which does not require a license.[190]emphasis added
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Mitt_Romney#Gun_ownership
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...the Gun Nut Gazette notifies all gun nuts who to vote for and whether to even vote at all. We just do whatever we're told by management.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I didn't know that.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Thanks
Seems to me he hated everyone.
Attitudes on race and nationality
Patton's attitude toward minorities varied depending on time and circumstance, with military necessity being of particular importance.
On black soldiers: "Individually they were good soldiers, but I expressed my belief at the time, and have never found the necessity of changing it, that a colored soldier cannot think fast enough to fight in armor."[111]
Patton stated that performance was more important than race or religious affiliation:[112] "I don't give a damn who the man is. He can be a nigger or a Jew, but if he has the stuff and does his duty, he can have anything I've got. By God! I love him."[112][113]
Later, Patton addressed a group of African-American tankers, saying:
Men, you're the first Negro tankers to ever fight in the American Army. I would never have asked for you if you weren't good. I have nothing but the best in my Army. I don't care what color you are as long as you go up there and kill those Kraut sons of bitches. Everyone has their eyes on you and is expecting great things from you. Most of all your race is looking forward to you. Don't let them down and damn you, don't let me down![114]
Patton also insisted on the assignment of some black officers as judges in military tribunals involving black defendants,[112] and he spent more time with his African-American aide, Sergeant Meeks, than with nearly anyone else while in Europe,[112] developing a relationship of mutual respect that transcended that of a general with his valet.
Patton disliked the British,[112] but appreciated Montgomery's organizational abilities more than either Eisenhower or Bradley did.[112]
Patton was horrified at what he found when his Third Army liberated Buchenwald concentration camp. Local German citizens claimed that they didn't know what was going on, though at least a few admitted to knowing of the atrocities but insisted they had been powerless to stop it. He ordered American troops to round up the approximately 2,000 local Germans and march them through the camps so they could see the atrocities firsthand.
Though many of his attitudes were common in his day, as with all of his opinions, he was often exceptionally blunt in his expression of them. He once wrote:
The difficulty in understanding the Russian is that we do not take cognizance of the fact that he is not a European, but an Asiatic, and therefore thinks deviously. We can no more understand a Russian than a Chinese or a Japanese, and from what I have seen of them, I have no particular desire to understand them except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them. In addition to his other amiable characteristics, the Russian has no regard for human life and they are all out sons-of-bitches, barbarians, and chronic drunks.[115]
After reading the Koran and observing North Africans, he wrote to his wife, "Just finished reading the Koran a good book and interesting." Patton had a keen eye for native customs and methods, wrote knowingly of local architecture, even rated the progress of word-of-mouth rumor in Arab country at 4060 miles (6497 km) a day. In spite of his regard for the Koran, he concluded, "To me it seems certain that the fatalistic teachings of Mohammad and the utter degradation of women is the outstanding cause for the arrested development of the Arab. . . . Here, I think, is a text for some eloquent sermon on the virtues of Christianity."[116][117]
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)I'd like to see some progressive Congressperson introduce legislation that assholes can't have guns. That would definitely get rid of a big chunk of gun owners.
We've found an interim step to removing guns in this country. Call it the "Patton Law."
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Ted Nugent and Don Trump have to give me theirs? Somebody else can have Cheney's and Wayne's.
Clames
(2,038 posts)Of course that type of legislation is exactly the opposite of what a progressive person would ask for, I'm not surprised that you would champion it.
Glaug-Eldare
(1,089 posts)We've finally reached that stage of perfection where none of our attitudes will ever be regarded as naive, bigoted, baseless, or just plain dumb. LBJ was a racist, too, so we should probably get rid of the tainted Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and all of the viciously racist Great Society programs. First amendment was passed by a bunch of slave-owners, so let's ditch that, same with the Fourth and Fifth... Time for an audit to get rid of everything that was accomplished before we became perfect. Wait...
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)He held them at gunpoint until everything was sorted out. No one was shot.
I will leave it to you and google to find the rest of the story.
Rittermeister
(170 posts)strapped dead Mexicans to the side of his field car, an act which supposedly shocked Black Jack Pershing, his superior at the time. When talking about Patton, it's kind of important to remember that he was born in the 1880s, and raised by exiled southern aristocrats. He was very 19th century in his outlook, in ways good and bad. On the other hand, if we judge every historical figure, nobody born before 1900 is going to come up looking great. Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, Lincoln had some racist tendencies, Marx and Engels had some seriously whacko ideas on history and biology, etc.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Sgt. William George Meeks was George Patton's personal orderly all through WWII and was one of the pallbearers at Patton's funeral. Every time Patton received a promotion, Sgt Meeks did as well, ending up as a Master Sergeant, the highest NCO rank in the US Army during that time period. M/Sgt Meeks went everywhere with Patton, including on leave and probably spent as much, if not more, time with Patton then anybody else during WWII. M/Sgt Meeks was African-American.
Sgt Thue P. Lee was Patton's personal cook from the time Patton landed in North Africa until Patton's death, Sgt Lee was Chinese-American
If Patton was such a racist, why did he allow these men to serve directly under him? As a general he could have easily had them transferred and certainly his wife would never had allowed M/Sgt Meeks to serve as a pallbearer if race was an issue to Patton.
Patton's views on race seemed to be consistent with society's views at the time and I base this on 20+ years of studying Patton and reading more then a dozen books about him.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Clames
(2,038 posts)He soaks in it like it's a hot tub with a massage chair....
Simo 1939_1940
(768 posts)that lives to flaunt their ignorance. A relatively rare breed, but certainly a most amusing one.
ileus
(15,396 posts)The fact that he was a good target shooter is cream on top of it all.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Clearly, someone was not paying attention during the movie!
Rittermeister
(170 posts)Somewhat overrated. The movie was pretty blatant hagiography. His personal beliefs were about a century out of date: rejecting mental illness as cowardice, views on race and religion, etc. Pretty decent field commander.
FYI, I have it on fairly good authority that after the slapping incidents got out, there was some talk of jumping Patton if he came to a certain hospital.
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)Prima Donna and probably had more than a few loose screws.
His personal beliefs however were fairly standard for the time. Racism was rampant in the military; if anything Patton was more progressive than his contemporaries in regards to race.
After the incidents with shell shocked soldiers, Patton took it upon himself to learn about the issue. Later in the war his command had some of the best treatment of soldiers who suffered from mental issues.
As for overrated- Eisenhower listed Patton as the third best American General ranked low only due to Ike's views on Patton's operational planning ability
or
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)No more of a prima donna than Montgomery was. And some would argue that both had a "few loose screws". Both excelled in what they did, and neither liked the other very much.
There was a basic difference in style. Monty would gather a huge amount of men and material before launching an overwhelming attack. Patton was a hack and slash commander. Able to hit the enemy where he was weakest and roll over him with armored forces.
Both worked well.
Oneshooter
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Or at least that's what I've come to believe.
Rittermeister
(170 posts)By the time Montgomery really got into power, the word was out from the British government to minimize casualties at all costs. They'd already lost a lot, even by '43. There's also been some conjecture that a number of the troops, who had been fighting since 1940, were showing signs of PTSD. Veteran British armored units performed somewhat listlessly in the Normandy campaign around Caen.
jeepnstein
(2,631 posts)an old vet told me once. He was in the Normandy invasion but in one of the later waves. He said that the British troops were "off" as he put it. As an example he described in great detail an atrocity a group of them committed against a German prisoner because their tea kettle got blown up. They built their fire on top of a bit of unexploded ordnance. He said the British men were already spent by the time they got to Normandy and everything they did took longer because of it. By comparison the Americans hadn't really experienced war the way the British had and seemed more eager. His observation was that once the British made it to the fight they were merciless in ways that kind of shocked him at times.
Rittermeister
(170 posts)400,000 dead is a fair bit bigger chunk out of a nation of 40,000,000 than a nation of 130,000,000.
jeepnstein
(2,631 posts)it was all the bombing. Even when they were in their rear area they were at war. They were losing family members, homes, and were under the cloud of invasion. Then along came the Americans with their "can do" attitude and this really pissed them off quite a bit.
Rittermeister
(170 posts)Was in it from Torch through Italy before he got hit. Supposedly had some readjustment problems - couldn't sleep in the same bed with his wife because he kept waking up in the middle of the night and thinking she was trying to kill him.
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)Although I have discovered he and Patton had mutual respect for the others abilities. Their personal rivalry never let them admit it to each other.
Their styles of warfare are still debated today. Which is better, attrition until you can launch an overwhelming attack or the blitzkrieg thrust before your opponent can muster a defense. The answer I think is whatever works in the particular situation. American style warfare relying on high tech and mechanized mobility, even in WW2, tends to favor the fast offensive.
Rittermeister
(170 posts)when he was military governor of Bavaria? Something like that? Anyway, it was in regards to displaced persons - refugees and ex-concentration camp prisoners, Jews, etc.
Others might believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, Patton wrote, but he knew he is not. In particular, he whispered to his diary, the Jews are lower than animals.
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)He did seem to have some anti-Semitic tendencies but,
He also faced criticism for opposing denazification and advocating dealing with the Soviets as a new enemy instead of ally.
Post war he did show signs of depression and erratic behavior. It is questioned if he was suffering from traumatic brain injury, though I have not found a reference to when/how he received a head injury.
Rittermeister
(170 posts)That's at least partially how the Nazis got into power - tons of unemployed soldiers on the streets, unable to transition back to civilian life. As I recall, the second-highest ace of WWI ended up running half the Luftwaffe under Goering.
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)Patton had the political savvy of an irritated badger but without the same restraint. He also had the filter between his brain and mouth removed
Nevertheless, he was exactly the General that was needed for that war. If it wasn't for him at the Bulge, the war in Europe could have been extended for six months to a year and it is very doubtful anyone else could have pivoted an entire amry to change the axis of attack like he did.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Nobody would have tried it for real.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...didn't like him is just another good reason to like him.
Callisto32
(2,997 posts)willing to shoot "his own men" for having that gall to demand that the .gov actually keep its contracts.
I don't care what he had to say about character as he proved his own to be brutish.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Hoover gave the order to MacArthur, who gave the order to Patton's commanding officer, who gave the order to the troops under his command (3rd Cavalry Regt).
Blame should be placed on Hoover and MacArthur, although the troops were only called in when the police could not longer control the crowds and the protests turned violent.
era veteran
(4,069 posts)The racist stuff is bullshit. Damn near all white people were racists then. They just did not know it.
He was a great field commander with vision and drive. His abilities shortened the war, kept American (and German) deaths down and had a pragmatic sense of the immediate future politic.
As a tanker and the son of one I am glad he was on our side.
sarisataka
(18,600 posts)Patton was notoriously strict on the appearance of his officers and very lenient in the treatment of front line enlisted
era veteran
(4,069 posts)Left a horse cav unit at Ft Riley.
Lots of changes in a couple of generations.
Dad never bitched about it, he was proud of it. He was wounded soon after. Went to England to get ready for the invasion and recuperate.
Rittermeister
(170 posts)My great granddad was in WWI in the Meuse-Argonne. Only member of my family to ever almost lose a thumb in a bayonet fight. . .yet.
era veteran
(4,069 posts)Kept a log book on horses the same as done on all vehicles.
The old man lived through N Africa, Hedgerows, Hurtgen Forrest but the worst was 25 November 1950.