Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Today's shooting news once again makes the obvious obvious. (Original Post) Loudly Jul 2012 OP
With you. elleng Jul 2012 #1
Against you. Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #34
Nice way to put it . . . NOT. elleng Jul 2012 #35
smells like reincarnation to me. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #58
So are matches and lighters sarisataka Jul 2012 #2
How about this one? permatex Jul 2012 #3
Same problem. Loudly Jul 2012 #5
So tell us how to disarm the criminals hack89 Jul 2012 #22
"some" members don't want to disarm the criminals. Tejas Jul 2012 #31
Guns in the hands of the good guys ARE the solution to guns in the hands of the bad guys. GreenStormCloud Jul 2012 #23
Oh look permatex Jul 2012 #43
too bad those aren't OPs. Maybe they could rack up some Recs. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #57
An earlier contrary DU post shows that a law-abiding citizen may have saved the lives of himself and AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #4
Armed robbers. Loudly Jul 2012 #6
If you know, as you admit in post #5, that "One of the robbers has a gun," why would you post this? AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #8
Bring me the "bat only" robbery stopped by the concealed carry gun. Loudly Jul 2012 #10
Thank you sarisataka Jul 2012 #11
Just calling the pro gun folk out on their lame postings. Loudly Jul 2012 #12
And if someone posted a link to a story where someone used a gun to stop an assault rl6214 Jul 2012 #14
So what is your solution to the problem? spin Jul 2012 #15
It was during the AWB that I purchased my first "plastic rifle" rl6214 Jul 2012 #46
You verify my point. Thanks. (n/t) spin Jul 2012 #54
do you hear what I hear? Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #59
The Gungeon is a tough place for many members of our party to post in ... spin Jul 2012 #61
There IS no valid argument for banning all firearms. cherokeeprogressive Jul 2012 #63
I disagree ... spin Jul 2012 #65
Now if we could just rid ourselves Meiko Jul 2012 #17
Try supporting YOUR assertion!!!!! Spoonman Jul 2012 #25
I think Loudly has quietly left this thread. rl6214 Jul 2012 #47
I think weapons absolutely embolden criminals. Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #51
Is it your stance Oneka Jul 2012 #33
If so wouldn't such a society be basically a police state? (n/t) spin Jul 2012 #60
Gun grabbers Oneka Jul 2012 #67
The term "gun grabbers" is somewhat offensive ... spin Jul 2012 #68
point taken. Oneka Jul 2012 #69
I always consider that when I am posting on DU it is a very liberal and progressive forum ... spin Jul 2012 #70
So you are a 'banner' sarisataka Jul 2012 #44
It'd be for the greater good of society....guns with ammo kill you know! ileus Jul 2012 #48
I believe the "Honorable" Mr. Deputy Mayor sarisataka Jul 2012 #49
TaliBanner: self-righteous, intolerant, convinced that their way is the only right and pure path Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #62
What are the points for this on your scale? CokeMachine Jul 2012 #73
one steaming cup of STF......... Tejas Jul 2012 #29
That's gonna leave a mark. Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #41
A gun also emboldened the stopping of the crime. Atypical Liberal Jul 2012 #50
Help me remember, folks.... burrfoot Jul 2012 #71
that is the consensus gejohnston Jul 2012 #72
They may not be the same person -- never mind I'm wrong --sorry!! nt CokeMachine Jul 2012 #74
Thanks! burrfoot Jul 2012 #75
Not until you provide a solution to disarm all criminals, everywhere. PavePusher Jul 2012 #42
But then, of course, the whole debate is moot. HALO141 Jul 2012 #78
It is a matter of belief sarisataka Jul 2012 #7
Or they believe that criminals who rely upon violence will allow them to telephone the police so AnotherMcIntosh Jul 2012 #9
Well fuck. Marinedem Jul 2012 #13
Welcome to DU and the Gungeon. (n/t) spin Jul 2012 #16
Welcome to the group. ileus Jul 2012 #21
Thanks! Marinedem Jul 2012 #66
Welcome Marine.................Semper Fi oneshooter Jul 2012 #55
You say it's a resoundingly bad idea. What's the answer? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #18
You find a single anecdote and claim it justifies restricting people’s rights SkatmanRoth Jul 2012 #19
One anecdote = the need for sweeping, unconstitutional confiscations from law-abiding citizens. Common Sense Party Jul 2012 #32
And then they act shocked that the NRA has such clout 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #39
If someone incites others to riot 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #38
Why did a gun shoot up that party....bad bad gun. ileus Jul 2012 #20
He took a plea for Burglary a while back. jeepnstein Jul 2012 #24
Only government employees and criminals should have guns slackmaster Jul 2012 #26
That LEO's who shoot 7year olds shouldn't have guns? Tejas Jul 2012 #27
Hey, Shares.... Callisto32 Jul 2012 #28
"familiar" Tejas Jul 2012 #30
What's your public policy solution? Johnny Rico Jul 2012 #36
In his before life he was in negotiations with oneshooter Jul 2012 #56
What about chemical fertilizers and passenger planes? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #37
If the private possesion of every gun was banned.. MicaelS Jul 2012 #40
ZACTLY. n/t cherokeeprogressive Jul 2012 #64
Guns and drug abuse. Remmah2 Jul 2012 #45
big thumbs up! DrDan Jul 2012 #52
Agree. Don't let those who can't venture outside without gun or two strapped to their body deter you Hoyt Jul 2012 #53
NO cops should have guns. Tejas Jul 2012 #76
I have lots of trust in citizens doing the right thing. jeepnstein Jul 2012 #77

sarisataka

(22,704 posts)
2. So are matches and lighters
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:02 AM
Jul 2012
Wilkins was also suspected of setting three fires to equipment or property owned by his former employer, an oil and gas company.
 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
5. Same problem.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:07 AM
Jul 2012

One of the robbers has a gun.

How does this argue in favor of guns in the hands of the public?

hack89

(39,181 posts)
22. So tell us how to disarm the criminals
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 07:33 AM
Jul 2012

so we don't have to carry in public. Are you going to make them illegal like drugs?

 

Tejas

(4,759 posts)
31. "some" members don't want to disarm the criminals.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:19 AM
Jul 2012

Instead, they want to create new classes of criminals so as to secure a future for their bureaucracies.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
23. Guns in the hands of the good guys ARE the solution to guns in the hands of the bad guys.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 08:41 AM
Jul 2012

Otherwise you have guns only in the hands of the bad guys and that leaves the rest of us helpless.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
4. An earlier contrary DU post shows that a law-abiding citizen may have saved the lives of himself and
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:04 AM
Jul 2012

others by having a lawfully concealed firearm for self-defense when two armed-robbers chose to attack peaceful customers in a Internet cafe.

DU headline: Customer at Internet cafe shoots 2 robbers (Video)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117251255

The video is at:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=428_1342491285

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
8. If you know, as you admit in post #5, that "One of the robbers has a gun," why would you post this?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:21 AM
Jul 2012

Yes. One of the robbers had a gun. That's armed robbery.

His accomplice had a baseball bat and was also participating in the armed robbery.

A gun used for an armed robbery and a baseball bat used for an armed robbery are both deadly weapons.

The armed robbery effort was stopped in less than 20 seconds.

Samuel Williams, 71, who fired the shots, has a concealed weapons permit, according to the Sheriff’s Office. Under Florida law, a person is allowed to use deadly force if he or she fears death or serious injury to themselves or others. As long as the person isn’t committing a crime and is in a place where he or she has a right to be, they are considered to be acting within the law.

Williams, who lives in Ocala, could not be reached for comment on Monday. But at least one of his 30 fellow patrons at the cafe wants to thank him.

“I think he is wonderful. If he wouldn’t have been there, there could have been some innocent people shot,” said Mary Beach.
http://www.ocala.com/article/20120716/ARTICLES/120719790/0/sports
 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
10. Bring me the "bat only" robbery stopped by the concealed carry gun.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:29 AM
Jul 2012

This story does absolutely no good for the guns in the hands of the public argument.

Why not?

Because a gun emboldened the commission of the crime.

It's a gun as solution to guns story, just as most of them are.

i.e. that perv Wayne LaPierre's wet dream.

sarisataka

(22,704 posts)
11. Thank you
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:39 AM
Jul 2012

I like a belly laugh at bed time.
With this logic you can only use a gun against a criminal who does not have a gun. Of course if you do that you have committed murder because everyone can go mano y mano against a criminal who does not have a gun.
Nice catch 22.

 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
12. Just calling the pro gun folk out on their lame postings.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:47 AM
Jul 2012

Just about every story they offer up which attempts to illustrate why the public should have access to guns and ammo begins with some dumbass using a gun and ammo.

All it illustrates is that guns and ammo in the hands of the public is a recipe for mischief.

So allow me my own belly laugh at their attempt at promoting their indefensible argument.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
14. And if someone posted a link to a story where someone used a gun to stop an assault
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:06 AM
Jul 2012

where there was no gun involved, just some other deadly weapon, you'd be whining about the use of excessive force. There is no pleasing you anti-gun zealots.

You use the tool that will best allow you to defend yourself. That happens to be a gun.

spin

(17,493 posts)
15. So what is your solution to the problem?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:14 AM
Jul 2012

It would appear that you might wish to ban the civilian ownership of all firearms which might be a noble goal as you state. 'All it illustrates is that guns and ammo in the hands of the public is a recipe for mischief."

Unfortunately it is politically impossible to accomplish this idea at this time in this nation. There are over 300 million firearms in our nation in the hands of an estimated 80 million individuals.

The support for gun bans has dropped dramatically since 1959. You might believe that there would be overwhelming support for banning handguns or semiautomatic firearms but you would be wrong.







We face serious problems in our nation and gun violence is one. In our history we have tried to ban certain items before such as alcohol during the Prohibition Era between 1919 and 1933 and we started our War on Drugs in 1971. We also tried to ban "assault weapons" in 1994 and the law expired ten years later in 2004.

Prohibition led to the development of organized crime and the corruption of many members of our law enforcement establishment and our elected politicians.

Prohibition In America

***snip***

True to La Guardia's prediction, Prohibition spawned organized crime, bootlegging and corruption among the police on an unprecedented scale. It is fair to say that the Volstead Act indirectly gave rise to the American Mafia, along with it's most famous figure, Al Capone. Capone, along with many others, including Kennedy family head Joe, made huge amounts of money running bootlegging operations from Canada all the way to Florida. Capone found a rival in the form of former attorney George Remus. Remus was a successful lawyer when Prohibition came into effect. He soon noticed that his criminal clients were making more money than he was from their bootlegging activities. Convinced that he could outdo them in the illegal alcohol business he became intimately aware of the Volstead Act. He soon found a loophole wherein he could buy distilleries and pharmacies in order to sell alcohol to himself under Government license for medicinal use. The liquor would disappear on the way to market. He moved to Cincinnati and bought up 9 whiskey distilleries. Remus bribed many officials in order to keep his operation going, including a half million dollar gift to the U.S. Attorney General.

Speakeasies soon flourished across the country. These were underground saloons. By 1925 there were more than 100,000 speakeasies in New York alone. The job of the Prohibition Enforcement agency was a hopeless one. It was also demoralising. The 3,000 jobs of the Prohibition Agency were held by 10,000 different men over a six year period. Still, throughout the Prohibition years millions of gallons of alcohol were confiscated. By the late twenties Prohibition was becoming a very unpopular reality. Democratic Party Presidential candidate Al Smith campaigned against it in 1928. Although he lost the election, Smith did manage to weld together a groundswell of discontent against Prohibitionism. Four years later, the Democrats again used Prohibition as an issue and this time their candidate, Franklin Roosevelt was swept into the White House. In February of 1933 Congress passed the 21st amendment which repealed prohibition. On December 5th of that year the 21st Amendment was ratified. America was no longer dry!
http://www.essortment.com/prohibition-america-21019.html


(On a side note I was raised in a fairly large home in Ohio that had once been a speakeasy.)

It is my opinion that we lost the War on Drugs many years ago and just as with prohibition this ban has caused the creation of dangerous gangs who often have turf warfare that are a leading cause of gun violence.

Gun and Gang Violence Prosecution

***snip***

NDAA’s Gang Response Model
The United States Department of Justice estimates that there approximately 1.4 million gang members in this country, up 40 percent since 2009, representing 33,000 gangs. As they expand their reach throughout our nation in search of new territory or trafficking routes, gangs bring with them drugs, weapons, and crime, conjuring fear and violence within our communities. Gangs are responsible for an average of 48 percent of violent crime in most jurisdictions, much higher in others, and they are increasingly beginning to engage in less visible crime, such as identity theft and human trafficking.
http://www.ndaa.org/gun_gang_home.html


The "Assault Weapons" ban was allowed to sunset and interesting enough I observed during the time that it was in place that military style semiautomatic weapons became very popular with shooters. Few of the regular shooters that I knew prior to the ban had any real interest in what they called "plastic rifles". Once the ban was in place, a few shooters decided to buy one as they were always available even during the ban. They were impressed and by the end of the ban almost every shooter that I knew owned at least one of these weapons. I was an exception as I could see little personal need to own one.

In recent years hunters have discovered just how versatile and useful these weapons can be.


20 Versatile Semi-Automatic Rifles


The debate is moot. Regardless of what you think or how you feel about using semi-automatic guns for hunting, autoloaders and AR-style rifles are becoming more common in camps and virtually every major manufacturer is producing these guns in calibers heavy enough to drop deer, hogs and bears. Not to mention the fact that they're a blast on the range.
http://www.outdoorlife.com/photos/gallery/guns/rifles/centerfire/2011/11/20-best-semi-automatic-rifles-big-game-hunting


Now you might have noticed that I am not arguing that allowing civilians to own firearms is either good or bad. That's an entirely different argument. I am merely focusing on what you would suggest to stop gun violence and pointing out the impossibility and foolishness of implementing gun bans if that is indeed what you favor.










 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
46. It was during the AWB that I purchased my first "plastic rifle"
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:41 PM
Jul 2012

It was exactly like every other AR15 except it had no bayonet lug or flash supressor. Functionally identical in every way to every other AR15. The AWB was a feel good law that did absolutely nothing to take guns off the streets.

spin

(17,493 posts)
61. The Gungeon is a tough place for many members of our party to post in ...
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:22 PM
Jul 2012

if they believe in banning all firearms or draconian gun control.

That's sad as there are valid arguments on both sides of the issue and a good debate allows everybody to consider their viewpoint and to consider the weaknesses of their position.

After posting here for a while I have found that those who oppose RKBA favor emotional argument and those who support it use facts and statistics.

I personally have seen both the good and the bad results that the civilian ownership of firearms can cause. Firearms are indeed very dangerous tools and not everybody should own one. Many of those who post in favor of gun bans or draconian gun laws have suffered tragedies in their lives caused by firearms. That's why I attempt to be polite to all those who post in the Gungeon who have a far different view than I do on RKBA.

I welcome the opinion of those who disagree with my support of the Second Amendment and always try to consider their viewpoint in a far and unbiased manner. Perhaps one day I will find a valid argument that I can't logically dispute and my view will change.

I hope to foster such discussion. In my opinion life should be an educational journey and experience and discussion should lead to a reevaluation of one's own personal beliefs.

spin

(17,493 posts)
65. I disagree ...
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 02:11 AM
Jul 2012

As with most issues there are valid points on both sides of the gun control issue including the ban on the ownership of all civilian firearms. However it is not my goal or objective to present them.

After considering both sides of the debate I feel that the stronger side supports RKBA.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
17. Now if we could just rid ourselves
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:19 AM
Jul 2012

of that pesky second amendment things would be just fine. I have an idea, why don't we restrict the first amendment too while we are at it. That way we can't talk about guns either. Anti gunners are always talking shit. They always yell about how guns are evil and we should get rid of all of them or we need more sensible gun laws. Lots of talk but never any suggestions on how to accomplish what they are preaching. No suggestions on how to deal with criminals.

So in the absence of any constructive ideas put forth by the anti-gunners the gun owners in this country have adopted their own approach. We arm ourselves and if someone attacks us or others we shoot the bastards. It seems to be working so why mess with success. There are a lot of gun owners in this country, on both sides of the political isle, and a whole lot of guns. We are here to stay and so are the guns, get used to it.

Oh yea, stop using the term "guns and ammo" It makes it sound like you don't know what you are talking about.

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
25. Try supporting YOUR assertion!!!!!
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 10:43 AM
Jul 2012
Because a gun emboldened the commission of the crime.


Provide us with ANYTHING (beside your lame ass opinion) that substantiates your claim!!!!!

We have address this before;

Vehicles do not "embolden" you to drive drunk
Knifes do not "embolden" you to stab someone
Poisons do not "embolden" you to kill your spouse
Spoons do not "embolden" you to over eat
New shoes do not "embolden" you to run from the police
Lighters do not "embolden" you to commit arson
Condoms do not "embolden" you to commit rape
Rope do not "embolden" you to strangle someone

GET IT!?


Guns do not have some mystical, magical, supernatural ability to influence the individuals behavior.

To believe otherwise places you at the same brain damaged level of mentality as birthers, and once again, ignorance on steroids!
 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
51. I think weapons absolutely embolden criminals.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 06:11 PM
Jul 2012

I think it is silly to argue that weapons do not embolden criminals.

Who would walk into a room full of people without a weapon and demand them to give them their money? They would get laughed out of the place.

But with a weapon, they know they will get compliance through fear.

So there is no doubt that a man with a weapon will be bolder than one without one.

That is not the point.

The point is that good people can also be emboldened with firearms, as was the case in this crime - a good man was able to stop a violent crime because he was emboldened and enabled by his firearm to act.

Oneka

(653 posts)
33. Is it your stance
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:29 AM
Jul 2012

That law enforcement officers, should remain armed, and all other citizens, should have thier firearms confiscated?

Oneka

(653 posts)
67. Gun grabbers
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 07:11 PM
Jul 2012

Have a tough time actually admitting to that stance. When they do admit it, they are advocating for, "guns" as a solution to "guns".

spin

(17,493 posts)
68. The term "gun grabbers" is somewhat offensive ...
Sat Jul 21, 2012, 08:32 PM
Jul 2012

although some people who oppose the Second Amendment do wish to pass laws that would ban and possibly confiscate many if not all firearms in civilian hands.

I also try to politely point out my viewpoint without insulting those who disagree with me. I seriously believe that we can make headway on the issue of gun violence in our nation if both sides attempt to find common ground and compromise to pass laws that are rational and effective.

Oneka

(653 posts)
69. point taken.
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 12:23 PM
Jul 2012

I do have a tendency to let some negative feelings out, when dealing with folks who want to destroy my rights. Name calling should not be the way to show it though.

spin

(17,493 posts)
70. I always consider that when I am posting on DU it is a very liberal and progressive forum ...
Sun Jul 22, 2012, 03:09 PM
Jul 2012

not an ultra conservative site.

In the past I used to post on more conservative sites about firearms and almost everybody agreed with my opinions. The problem was such sites often contained political views on other topics which I disagreed with as I am a Democrat.

I found that DU was basically more aligned with my political views but many posters largely disagreed with my feelings about gun control. I decided to test my thoughts on this issue by debating them with some very intelligent and liberal people. It has proved challenging and along the way I have learned far more than I would have if I would have continued to post on the more conservative sites. Both sides of the gun control issue have good arguments to make and all deserve consideration.

I doubt if I have convinced any very liberal posters to change their views on gun control however I feel that insulting them would accomplish nothing so I do my best to try to be polite. I sometimes get insulted by some who use this technique as they feel they are losing the debate on gun control but overall most here have been reasonably polite in their responses. When someone does flame me, than I merely laugh and realize that I am winning the argument.

sarisataka

(22,704 posts)
44. So you are a 'banner'
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:15 PM
Jul 2012
guns and ammo in the hands of the public is a recipe for mischief.


10 points to Slytherin for honesty.



Now to your claim
promoting their indefensible argument

how, pray tell, does honest citizen defend themselves from gun wielding bad guy? You should we all accept our role as good victims and accept robbery, injury rape and death as God and Deputy Mayor Quander intended?

sarisataka

(22,704 posts)
49. I believe the "Honorable" Mr. Deputy Mayor
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 03:04 PM
Jul 2012

said we would only escalate the situation. Wouldn't want that now. Some poor underprivileged criminal could get hurt.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
62. TaliBanner: self-righteous, intolerant, convinced that their way is the only right and pure path
Thu Jul 19, 2012, 12:28 AM
Jul 2012

and more than willing to take away others' freedoms in order to enforce their extreme, fundamentalist view of morality.

 

CokeMachine

(1,018 posts)
73. What are the points for this on your scale?
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 01:35 AM
Jul 2012

According to the SharesUnited's math this would be a -1. Bat +1, Gun (criminal) -1 and Gun (victim) -1. Thank god you think the criminals and victims are both bad -- not!! Bless your pea pickin' heart (I really do love peas).

 

Tejas

(4,759 posts)
29. one steaming cup of STF.........
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:12 AM
Jul 2012

Concealed carry permit holder fends off 4 attackers

Police say that the concealed carry permit holder was in a parking lot near 195th Avenue and Indian School Road when 4 males in their late teens or early twenties approached him and attacked with a baseball bat. After being hit several times in the head and arms, the concealed carry permit holder is said to have drawn and fired his handgun, striking one of the attackers and causing all four of them to flee. Police are seeking the suspects, and the concealed carry permit holder was treated on the scene for minor injuries.





http://www.examiner.com/article/concealed-carry-permit-holder-fends-off-4-attackers



Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
41. That's gonna leave a mark.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:39 PM
Jul 2012

I'm gonna guess that the bat emboldened the commission of the crime.

Now the TaliBanners will want to ban bats.

Should make for an interesting World Series.

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
50. A gun also emboldened the stopping of the crime.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 06:08 PM
Jul 2012

You always ignore the good things that people do with guns, and you are willing to prevent any good thing being done with guns in a futile attempt to stop people from doing bad things with guns.

burrfoot

(821 posts)
71. Help me remember, folks....
Mon Jul 23, 2012, 11:43 PM
Jul 2012

this sounds wicked familiar.

Loudly = Shares United?

Am I allowed to ask that? I confess that part of the bylaws is unclear to me. I'll be happy to edit if necessary.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
42. Not until you provide a solution to disarm all criminals, everywhere.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:18 PM
Jul 2012

I'm betting that not only can you not do this, you won't even try.

HALO141

(911 posts)
78. But then, of course, the whole debate is moot.
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 11:42 AM
Jul 2012

If no one is using guns for ill the no one will give a crap one way or the other who has them and when.

sarisataka

(22,704 posts)
7. It is a matter of belief
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:14 AM
Jul 2012

If you don't believe in guns strongly enough the criminals gun will magically vanish.

 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
9. Or they believe that criminals who rely upon violence will allow them to telephone the police so
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 01:28 AM
Jul 2012

that the police can arive in a timely manner and kinda sort things out.

People who carry such beliefs need to get out in the real world a little more often.

 

Marinedem

(373 posts)
13. Well fuck.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:25 AM
Jul 2012

I coulda sworn we outlawed murder already.

We should get around to that.

If not that, then at least we should at least outlaw guns. Maybe criminals and psychopaths will follow that one, if not the other.

Yessir, a land in which the police and military have a monopoly on force is just what I've always dreamed of!

One day, one day....




Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
18. You say it's a resoundingly bad idea. What's the answer?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 04:37 AM
Jul 2012

Do you think the public should have no right to own firearms? How about the police?

SkatmanRoth

(843 posts)
19. You find a single anecdote and claim it justifies restricting people’s rights
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 06:34 AM
Jul 2012

The Constitution of the United States clearly states that the Government will not restrict our right to keep and bear arms. If you do not like people having rights guaranteed under our Constitution, start a movement to replace the Second Amendment.

Keep us posted on your progress.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
32. One anecdote = the need for sweeping, unconstitutional confiscations from law-abiding citizens.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:29 AM
Jul 2012

It's the Way of the TaliBanners.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
39. And then they act shocked that the NRA has such clout
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:12 PM
Jul 2012

They don't see that that is a pushback against their own efforts.

If they'd just quit it the NRA would lose its mass appeal.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
38. If someone incites others to riot
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:11 PM
Jul 2012

people never respond with "its time to repeal the first amendment".

Or if a murderer gets off because the police couldn't search his home and he goes on to kill again it's never "we must get rid of the 5th amendment".


It's always on the person who did it. Not the rights that enabled him to cause harm.

jeepnstein

(2,631 posts)
24. He took a plea for Burglary a while back.
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 09:28 AM
Jul 2012

That makes him a Felon. And we all know about the rules concerning felons and firearms, don't we?

Law-abiding citizens are not the problem here.

 

Johnny Rico

(1,438 posts)
36. What's your public policy solution?
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 11:42 AM
Jul 2012

Do you have a proposal that will prevent the public from having guns and ammo?

If not, what's the point?

oneshooter

(8,614 posts)
56. In his before life he was in negotiations with
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 10:23 PM
Jul 2012

the military of Canada and Mexico. I guess it didn't pan out.

MicaelS

(8,747 posts)
40. If the private possesion of every gun was banned..
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 12:38 PM
Jul 2012

And every gun in private possession was rounded up and destroyed, criminal gangs would start smuggling guns into the US to feed the demand for guns by dope dealers and other criminals in this country. And then you, and others with your mindset would still be screaming "something needs to be done to get those guns off the street."

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
53. Agree. Don't let those who can't venture outside without gun or two strapped to their body deter you
Wed Jul 18, 2012, 08:54 PM
Jul 2012

They are a relatively small minority here who carry a printed Constitution in their pants too that has "a well regulated militia" whited out.

jeepnstein

(2,631 posts)
77. I have lots of trust in citizens doing the right thing.
Tue Jul 24, 2012, 11:38 AM
Jul 2012

They are by and large a pretty easy going and law-abiding group. That's why I'm a liberal, because I believe in the innate goodness of people.

Sure, we have criminals. We always will. And we'll have crazies. But I'm not into doing collective punishment against the whole nation for the crimes of a very few. Perhaps we would be better off looking at the root sources of most of the violent crime in the U.S.?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Today's shooting news onc...