Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Top Ten Ways the Beltway Press will treat Gen. Cartwright differently from Snowden
http://www.juancole.com/2013/06/beltway-cartwright-differently.htmlTop Ten Ways the Beltway Press will treat Gen. Cartwright differently from Snowden
Posted on 06/28/2013 by Juan Cole
NBC reports that Gen. James Hoss Cartwright is under investigation as the source for David Sangers 2012 New York Times article revealing that the United States is behind the Stuxnet computer virus, which was used to infect computers at Irans Natanz nuclear enrichment facilities and at the Bushehr nuclear energy plants and delay their going hot.
High government officials in Washington routinely leak classified information, as part of turf battles inside the government. Cartwright may have been using Sanger to ensure that Stuxnet was not wholly abandoned (it was his baby). That such leaks are so routine, and are part of Washingtons way of doing business, is what makes the harsh espionage charges against people like Edward Snowden so hypocritical. He who is without leaks should cast the first stone.
The Cartwright story (and remember that he is only a suspect) intersects with Edward Snowdens revelations about National Security Administration spying in many ways. It seems likely that suspicion is now falling on Cartwright because the NSA knows David Sangers phone number and has been looking at everyone he talked to on the phone in the months leading up to his article. We know that the NSA has been repeatedly requesting massive amounts of US phone information and storing it for easy search. Since Sangers article is proof that an illegal act was committed, as Obama said at the time, getting a FISA warrant to go through Sangers already-stored records would have been childs play. When the PATRIOT Act was proposed, the FBI promised it would be used only for counter-terrorism. But that promise has for many years rung hollow.
While Osama Ben Laden knew not to use the phone during the last seven years of his life, American reporters and generals thought they were safe. PRISM did not catch Ben Laden because he went off the communications grid, and now anyone who wants to do anything the Federal government considers illicit had better do the same. This simple observation demonstrates that the Obama/ NSA cover story, that they are collecting all these phone records to fight terrorism, makes no sense. The data is most likely to be used against American non-terrorists
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1024 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top Ten Ways the Beltway Press will treat Gen. Cartwright differently from Snowden (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Jun 2013
OP
The top reason why Cartwright will be treated differently than Scumball Snowden is the fact SS has
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#2
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)1. The BIG story the media seems to have missed.
War has been declared on Iran.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)2. The top reason why Cartwright will be treated differently than Scumball Snowden is the fact SS has
Carried espionage to a total new level. I must have lost count on the ten ways Cartwright and Snowden will be treated but this does not even compare, not even close.