Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 09:30 AM Nov 2013

Ruth: Botching F-35 dwarfs ACA website

http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/columns/ruth-botching-f-35-dwarfs-aca-website/2148965



Ruth: Botching F-35 dwarfs ACA website
Daniel Ruth, Times Columnist
Thursday, October 24, 2013 4:52pm

There isn't enough lipstick in the world to make the Affordable Care Act's website pig look like a Vogue model. Little wonder then Roget's Thesaurus is groaning under the weight of Washington's ire to describe perhaps the worst inept debut since The Lone Ranger.

~snip~

But the congressional crusade for fiscal accountability would seem to be somewhat selective. If the Beltway is going to fulminate over $300 million wasted to create a website, surely there must be some froth to spare for the $400 billion already flushed away to develop the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which after years of delays and cost overruns has yet to shoot so much as a pea against an adversary in combat.

The F-35, which was touted to become the most sophisticated combat aircraft in history, went into development in 2001. Fast forward 12 years to January, when J. Michael Gilmore, the Pentagon's director of operational test and evaluation, appeared before the U.S. Senate's Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense. It wasn't pretty.

Gilmore told the committee that after 12 years and $400 billion, the F-35 can't fly at night. It can't fly in bad weather. It can't fly if there is lightning in the area. It can't fly in close formation. It can't be allowed to stall in training, which is an essential protocol for any aviator, even student pilots at the controls of a single-engine Cessna.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ruth: Botching F-35 dwarfs ACA website (Original Post) unhappycamper Nov 2013 OP
I'd feel safer with healthcare than with another military jet. Scuba Nov 2013 #1
Republicon BOONDOGLES are special Berlum Nov 2013 #2
it has no mission.... madrchsod Nov 2013 #3

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
3. it has no mission....
Thu Nov 21, 2013, 09:39 AM
Nov 2013

it does`t have an enemy. the days of the fighter plane are numbered. even if there is a conventional war in the future this plane will be obsolete.

hell even the commercial airline pilots are having a difficult time flying the new generation of passenger jets.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Ruth: Botching F-35 dwarf...