Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Former US defense chief (Hagel): Obama 'hurt credibility' by not bombing Syria in 2013
Source: The Guardian
Former US defense chief: Obama 'hurt credibility' by not bombing Syria in 2013
Chuck Hagel questions lack of follow-through on promise to bomb Assad regime
over its use of chemical weapons: Ill let history judge if it was the right decision
David Smith in Washington
Thursday 14 January 2016 15.53 GMT
Barack Obamas credibility was hurt after he promised to bomb the Syrian regime if it used chemical weapons but then failed to follow through, his then defense secretary has said.
Chuck Hagel said he spent 30 August 2013 preparing Tomahawk cruise missile strikes against Bashar al-Assad, who had unleashed sarin gas on his own people in a Damascus suburb. Obama had said such a move would cross a red line but then, possibly influenced in part by the British parliaments vote against airstrikes, he ordered his Pentagon chief to abort.
I think it did hurt the credibility of the president of the United States, Hagel told the Atlantic Council thinktank in Washington on Wednesday. When a president of the United States says something, it means something.
We Americans, I think, kind of take that for granted: Well, the president said this, so what? It isnt that way around the world. When a president of the United States says something, especially about foreign policy or about another leader of another country, that means something, and we have to understand that that means something, and the president and the White House has to understand that means something.
The decision not to attack did, however, enable a diplomatic deal brokered by Russia in which Assad agreed to surrender his poison gas arsenal and production equipment to international chemical weapons inspectors. Hagel praised the hi-tech US military effort to then destroy the chemical agents.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Chuck Hagel questions lack of follow-through on promise to bomb Assad regime
over its use of chemical weapons: Ill let history judge if it was the right decision
David Smith in Washington
Thursday 14 January 2016 15.53 GMT
Barack Obamas credibility was hurt after he promised to bomb the Syrian regime if it used chemical weapons but then failed to follow through, his then defense secretary has said.
Chuck Hagel said he spent 30 August 2013 preparing Tomahawk cruise missile strikes against Bashar al-Assad, who had unleashed sarin gas on his own people in a Damascus suburb. Obama had said such a move would cross a red line but then, possibly influenced in part by the British parliaments vote against airstrikes, he ordered his Pentagon chief to abort.
I think it did hurt the credibility of the president of the United States, Hagel told the Atlantic Council thinktank in Washington on Wednesday. When a president of the United States says something, it means something.
We Americans, I think, kind of take that for granted: Well, the president said this, so what? It isnt that way around the world. When a president of the United States says something, especially about foreign policy or about another leader of another country, that means something, and we have to understand that that means something, and the president and the White House has to understand that means something.
The decision not to attack did, however, enable a diplomatic deal brokered by Russia in which Assad agreed to surrender his poison gas arsenal and production equipment to international chemical weapons inspectors. Hagel praised the hi-tech US military effort to then destroy the chemical agents.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/14/chuck-hagel-barack-obama-hurt-credibility-pledge-bomb-syria-chemical-weapons
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 950 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former US defense chief (Hagel): Obama 'hurt credibility' by not bombing Syria in 2013 (Original Post)
Eugene
Jan 2016
OP
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)1. We're making up for it
By bombing Yemen and helping ISIS there.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)2. It wasn't clear who ordered that attack. Evidence shows it was an unauthorised launch by a unit
commander. US Signals intelligence officers described frantic, angry telephone calls after the attacks by the Syrian Defense Minister's office to unit commanders trying to determine what had occurred. There is no clear evidence leading back up the the chain of command, and no plausible reports that Assad ordered this to happen.