Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Top US Intelligence Official: Snowden Should Not Be Pardoned
Source: Associated Press
Top US Intelligence Official: Snowden Should Not Be Pardoned
By DEB RIECHMANN, ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON Sep 20, 2016, 8:14 PM ET
The nation's top intelligence official said Tuesday that he could never agree with a decision to pardon Edward Snowden.
Snowden was an National Security Agency contract employee when he took more than a million documents and leaked them to journalists who revealed massive domestic surveillance programs begun in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. The programs collected the telephone metadata records of millions of Americans and examined emails from overseas.
"I could understand what he did, if ... what he exposed was limited to domestic surveillance. ... But he exposed so much else that had absolutely nothing to do with domestic surveillance, where he has damaged our capability against foreign threats. He has taken away capabilities that were used to protect our troops in Afghanistan," Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said. "I don't think I could concur in offering him a pardon."
Snowden's revelations about the agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' phone records set off a fierce debate that pitted civil libertarians concerned about privacy against more hawkish lawmakers fearful about losing tools to combat terrorism. Democrats and libertarian-leaning Republicans pushed through a reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act last year that ended the program.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By DEB RIECHMANN, ASSOCIATED PRESS WASHINGTON Sep 20, 2016, 8:14 PM ET
The nation's top intelligence official said Tuesday that he could never agree with a decision to pardon Edward Snowden.
Snowden was an National Security Agency contract employee when he took more than a million documents and leaked them to journalists who revealed massive domestic surveillance programs begun in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. The programs collected the telephone metadata records of millions of Americans and examined emails from overseas.
"I could understand what he did, if ... what he exposed was limited to domestic surveillance. ... But he exposed so much else that had absolutely nothing to do with domestic surveillance, where he has damaged our capability against foreign threats. He has taken away capabilities that were used to protect our troops in Afghanistan," Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said. "I don't think I could concur in offering him a pardon."
Snowden's revelations about the agency's bulk collection of millions of Americans' phone records set off a fierce debate that pitted civil libertarians concerned about privacy against more hawkish lawmakers fearful about losing tools to combat terrorism. Democrats and libertarian-leaning Republicans pushed through a reauthorization of the USA Patriot Act last year that ended the program.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/top-us-intelligence-official-snowden-pardoned-42235655
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top US Intelligence Official: Snowden Should Not Be Pardoned (Original Post)
Eugene
Sep 2016
OP
He made a decision without the knowledge of the consequences, he was not smart in his decision.
Thinkingabout
Sep 2016
#1
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)1. He made a decision without the knowledge of the consequences, he was not smart in his decision.
He has done great harm to the US, why should anyone expect a pardon, never.
Ford_Prefect
(8,544 posts)2. Clapper is a dangerous New Cold Warrior.
A number of intel agency critics and former agents disagree with his assertion of the damage done vis-a-vis Afghanistan and elsewhere.
