Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Veterans
Related: About this forumChuck Hagel: Obama's Hatchet Man?
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/bob-burnett/47890/chuck-hagel-obamas-hatchet-manChuck Hagel: Obama's Hatchet Man?
by Bob Burnett | February 2, 2013 - 11:47am
Even though he's one of their own, many Republicans oppose President Obama's Secretary of Defense nominee, former Senator Chuck Hagel. GOP leaders fear Hagel will be Obama's hatchet man, leading the effort to shrink the defense budget.
~snip~
If Hagel is confirmed he will oversee a bitter fight on the trajectory of the DOD budget. The 2012 budget was $646 billion -- roughly 20 percent of the total U.S. budget. But in 2013 sequestration would cut $55 billion from the proposed budget. The current Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said such a cut would be "a disaster for national defense." Nonetheless, many Washington pundits doubt that there would be a dramatic impact, pointing to waste in defense spending and noting the U.S. is winding down two wars.
In the President's proposed 2013 budget, the defense allocation is $701 billion, the largest discretionary category after entitlements at $2.217 trillion (56 percent). Since America has left Iraq and plans to leave Afghanistan in 2014, it seems logical that the U.S. could reduce the size of its military forces. This is what happened after the end of the war in Vietnam and the end of the Cold War. But when it comes to the defense budget, deliberations are seldom rational.
There are several reasons for the contentious nature of defense budget deliberations. One is that US defense allocations are so enormous their size warps perspective. Writing in the New Yorker, journalist Jill Lepore observed, "Between 1998 and 2011, military spending doubled, reaching more than seven hundred billion dollars a year -- more, in adjusted dollars, than at any time since the Allies were fighting the Axis." The Council on Foreign Relations reported that in 2011 the United States had 4 percent of the world's population, accounted for 22 percent of the gross domestic product, yet was responsible for 42 percent of military spending. Lepore observed that what drives our defense budget is "the idea that the manifest destiny of the United States is to patrol the world... six decades after V-J day nearly three hundred thousand American troops are stationed overseas including fifty-five thousand in Germany, thirty-five thousand in Japan, and ten thousand in Italy." Former Republican Congressman Ron Paul claimed the U.S. military operates out of 900 bases deployed in 130 nations.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 3376 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chuck Hagel: Obama's Hatchet Man? (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Feb 2013
OP
Pentagon spending is a giant PACMan eating everthing else in the federal budget. Start chopping.
leveymg
Feb 2013
#1
Can you show me the votes Hagel cast in the Senate that would indicate such leanings?
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2013
#2
leveymg
(36,418 posts)1. Pentagon spending is a giant PACMan eating everthing else in the federal budget. Start chopping.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)2. Can you show me the votes Hagel cast in the Senate that would indicate such leanings?
He voted for every war authorization that came up and for all the funding as well, so the assumption that he is opposed to all the things he supported in the Senate confuses me. He has a voting record. Which votes indicate that he's interested in less spending? Thanks.