It is to laugh - More reasons to make fun of trump

[3825-87867]

For Driveller Trump and his ilk...

[The Blue Flower]

1. Too true to be humorous

Many of these cut to the bone. I didn't laugh, I said 'ouch'. And thanks for reminding us of Hugh Thompson, a real hero. May he rest in peace and power.

[orangecrush]

2. Thanks

Enjoyed these!

[70sEraVet]

3. Maybe I'm missing something, but.....

"Replacing Trump with Biden is like shitting your pants then changing your shirt"??
It sounds critical of Biden, no?

But I heartedly applaud the tribute to Warrant Officer Hugh Thompson!

[Marie Marie]

4. Yeah, wondered that myself...

[Totally Tunsie]

13. See #12 below

[llmart]

5. Yeah, I didn't get that one either.

The rest are all spot on, but I'm not in much of a laughing mood today. The situation is too dire and none of it is funny.

[Totally Tunsie]

14. See #12 below

[FadedMullet]

6. Well, that's three of us who were left scratching our heads. Rereading it a couple of times didn't help.

[Totally Tunsie]

15. See #12 below

[et tu]

7. my thoughts too

the names should be reversed.

[Totally Tunsie]

16. See #12 below

[PatSeg]

9. Yeah, I'm not getting that one either

[Totally Tunsie]

17. See #12 below

[eppur_se_muova]

10. Pretty sure it should be "replacing Biden with Trump". At least in a fact-based Universe.

Maybe taken from a Trump-humper witout careful reading, though.

[Totally Tunsie]

18. See #12 below

[Totally Tunsie]

12. Think of it this way:

Replacing trump - 2016, FIRST TERM shitting pants -
with Biden - 2020, changing shirt, cleaned up.
Thus, the good after the bad.
That's how I read it anyway...

[PatSeg]

8. These are great

The difference between Jim Jones and Donald Trump - Not only would he make people pay for the Kool-Aid, he would brand it with the name "Trump" like he does with everything else.

[eppur_se_muova]

11. Susan Ryan Murphy has voiced exactly what I began to feel as the vote on the Bilious Billionaires Bailout advanced ...

Uglicans are spacing out the timing of events so that the GOP might lose mid-terms in '26 but then have the backlash fall not on themselves, but on Dems who replace them, by selectively exploiting the reliable inattention of the majority of voters.