HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » True Crime (Group) » Court hears debate over a...

Fri Dec 3, 2021, 12:01 PM

Court hears debate over accused synagogue shooter's words

Source: Associated Press

Court hears debate over accused synagogue shooter’s words

December 2, 2021

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The Pittsburgh synagogue massacre defendant’s statements at the scene and at a hospital should be allowed at trial, prosecutors told a federal judge in a new filing, in part because concerns about public safety were a valid reason to keep questioning him even after he’d asked for an attorney.

The U.S. attorney’s office and the legal defense team for Robert Bowers both made extensive arguments in recent days as U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose considers whether to grant his request to suppress statements made after he had been shot and was being treated for gunshot wounds to the leg and shoulder.

His lawyers, who also filed a brief this week, said Bowers’ assertion of his rights to remain silent and to confer with a lawyer should mean communications initiated by officers or what they overheard while he was being treated should not be used against him.

Officers may have had the authority to remain by Bowers as he was treated at a hospital for three gunshot wounds, but they should not have been allowed to listen in and record those conversations with medical providers or be permitted to use them at trial, they told Ambrose.


Read more: https://apnews.com/article/religion-pittsburgh-massacres-pittsburgh-synagogue-massacre-robert-bowers-d6746ee761a3c2561233abe4a09b5f4b

0 replies, 255 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Reply to this thread