Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Auggie

(31,133 posts)
1. I was watching this game. According to A's announcers during the wrap-up,
Thu May 9, 2013, 09:02 AM
May 2013

the A's were controlling the telecast and replay -- what fans saw -- and Cleveland was controlling the review -- what the umpires saw. We don't know if Cleveland had the capacity to "enlarge/blow-up" the replay and slo-mo the ball's impact, or, chose not to show the detail, i.e., cheated.

The umpires could only make a call on what they were shown. In real-time, even the A's announcers weren't sure it was a home run. Whatever happened -- blunder, technical problem, cheating, bad umpiring -- the review system really failed.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
2. I watched the replay in my note cell phone
Thu May 9, 2013, 09:38 AM
May 2013

And could clearly see it hit the rail.

If the story is that they only saw the review in real time... someone needs to be fired.

Auggie

(31,133 posts)
4. Response by crew chief Angel Hernandez:
Thu May 9, 2013, 10:33 AM
May 2013

"It was not evident on the TV we had that it was a home run. ... I don't know what kind of replay you had, but you can't reverse a call unless there's 100 percent evidence."

http://www.sfgate.com/athletics/article/A-s-lose-4-3-after-disputed-call-4500603.php

Something is really screwed-up. MLB must investigate, because there was 100 percent evidence.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
5. What do they have---a black and white TV from the sixties?
Thu May 9, 2013, 11:31 AM
May 2013

Two umps holding the rabbit ears while the other watches?

chelsea0011

(10,115 posts)
3. After watching quite a few games this year, I also think the strike zone has changed.
Thu May 9, 2013, 10:02 AM
May 2013

The high and low strikes are hard to come by for pitchers but the call waist high and just outside the plate seems to be getting the strike calls this year. Now, whether or not those strike zone boxes networks use are totally accurate is another thing. It might be why players are striking out at a huge rate.

Auggie

(31,133 posts)
7. UPDATE: Umpires had broadcast replays available to them from both Oakland & Cleveland
Thu May 9, 2013, 01:57 PM
May 2013

apparently (my guess) they chose to only review the Cleveland replay. Had they seen the Oakland verison with enhanced effects they would have reveresed the call.

Ken Korach of the A's just announced this on radio during today's radio broadcast.

Umps blew it by relying on a single, and inferior, replay.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Sometimes I think MLB Ump...