Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:09 PM May 2016

Is a juiced ball causing MLB's large home run spike?

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/news/10-degrees--is-a-juiced-ball-causing-mlb-s-large-home-run-spike-025820397-mlb.html

At the risk of sounding like someone who believes in chemtrails and listens to Infowars religiously, I have a confession to make: More and more I’m convinced that juiced balls are causing a home run spike throughout baseball.

Nolan Arenado and Trevor Story are 1-2 in the NL home run race. (AP Photo)I am far from the only one. It’s hitters and pitchers and coaches and executives and even rational, cogent analysts who cannot find a reasonable explanation for the spike in home runs dating back to last August. The HR/FB rate – the percentage of fly balls that end up over the fence – spiked over the season’s final two months, and it has continued this April.

With 11.8 percent of fly balls leaving the yard in the season’s first month, it marked the highest April rate since the league started tracking the data in 2002. The number mirrored those of August (12.2 percent) and September (12.3 percent), which Hardball Times analyst Jon Roegele noticed after not even a month. Roegele studied it and came to an impasse.

“I couldn't find anything to describe that amount of HR/offensive change, as far as weather, strike zone, where pitchers were pitching, etc.,” he wrote in an email this week. “I suspected that they changed something with the balls after the All-Star break last year as nothing else in the data could explain it.”

When the email landed, I thought I heard black helicopters whirling above. On the eve of the season, Ben Lindbergh and Rob Arthur at Five Thirty-Eight investigated the HR/FB spike and all the causes that leap to the mind’s forefront. They even sent balls from 2014 and 2015 to a lab for testing to see any differences. None showed. They might as well have been the same.


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NRaleighLiberal

(60,014 posts)
1. Not unless they are being used selectively! Hanley Ramirez and Xander Bogaerts have only one each..
Mon May 2, 2016, 07:13 PM
May 2016

I would think if the balls were juiced, the way that Hanley swings, he would have 10 by now!

True confession - life long Red Sox fan here!

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
4. Simple answer...the pitching hasn't been as good
Mon May 2, 2016, 09:20 PM
May 2016

The really good pitchers are getting older...this goes in cycles...a period of good hitting, then good pitching.

Iggo

(47,554 posts)
6. It's the players that're juiced, not the baseballs.
Tue May 3, 2016, 01:47 AM
May 2016

Didn't we go through this recently?

I swear I remember giant-headed mooks crushing 60 and 70 HR's per season.

They tried to say back then that the balls were wound tighter. Before Barry Bonds made it obvious.

Again: It ain't the balls that're juiced. It's the players.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Is a juiced ball causing ...