Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumMemo to Presidential Candidates: Redistribution of Wealth Is a Divine Commandment
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-obrien/redistribution-of-wealth-is-a-divine-commandment_b_1322365.htmlWilliam O'Brien
Coordinator, The Alternative Seminary
Posted: 03/ 8/2012 11:30 am
Once again, the U.S. presidential election process is marked by the peculiar American interplay of religion and politics. As in the past several campaigns, conservative Christians are a prize voting bloc: Since the beginning of the campaign, we have witnessed the various Republican candidates vigorously vying for their votes, plying their respective pieties and accentuating their evangelical credentials.
Interestingly, the religious vote is highly prized despite the fact that the usual social issues that are the evangelicals' bread and butter -- abortion, traditional marriage -- are taking a decidedly backseat to urgent economic issues during these trying times of prolonged recession. (Though the current bizarre controversy over birth control may be shifting the terrain a bit.) That hardly means that those on the religious right aren't raising their voices. A subtext in much of the political discourse seems to be a kind of "biblical economics." Conservative Christians are among the most fervent defenders of the free market, which they see as divinely mandated; they are likewise among the most vituperative opponents of any socialist redistribute-the-wealth schemes, which, one might infer from their criticisms, are nothing short of satanic.
President Obama himself stoked the flames of controversy a few weeks back at the National Prayer Breakfast, when he underscored a biblical basis for his policies, including his suggestion that raising taxes on the most affluent Americans "coincides with Jesus's teaching that 'for unto whom much is given, much shall be required.'" Not surprisingly, his words raised the theological and political ire of many Christian leaders. Ralph Reed of the Faith and Freedom Coalition called the President's connection of his tax policy to Jesus's teachings "theologically threadbare and straining credulity." Columnist Cal Thomas suggested it was Marxist, not biblical. "Abuse and mangling of Scripture" were common critiques from Obama's religiously minded antagonists.
In fact, the Bible has plenty to say about economics, but it is more radical than what either conservatives or liberals usually assert.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1310 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Memo to Presidential Candidates: Redistribution of Wealth Is a Divine Commandment (Original Post)
cbayer
Mar 2012
OP
Oh, for fuck's sake, "Biblical Economics" what type of bullshit is this?
Humanist_Activist
Mar 2012
#7
cbayer
(146,218 posts)4. My bad - thanks for that. I added it now.
Response to cbayer (Original post)
gater This message was self-deleted by its author.
appleannie1
(5,068 posts)3. link?
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)5. Old Testament laws are optional for Christians
deacon_sephiroth
(731 posts)6. absolutely
regardless of what it ACTUALLY says about every single one of those rules being valid until the end of humanity, they're actually subjective and only relavent for that time and context. I know I've heard that somewhere before... once or twice >.>
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)7. Oh, for fuck's sake, "Biblical Economics" what type of bullshit is this?
Is there any area you can't insert that book in, and the thing is its damn near dead wrong in everything about economics, just like in morality.