Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 10:15 AM Jul 2014

George Carlin gets street named in his honor, after compromise with Catholic Church

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/george-carlin-street-named-honor-compromise-catholic-church-blog-entry-1.1860979
Legendary comedian George Carlin now has a Manhattan street named in his honor, but it took a compromise with an old nemesis — the Catholic Church — to make it happen.

Mayor de Blasio signed legislation Wednesday renaming W. 121st St. between Morningside Drive and Amsterdam Ave. as “George Carlin Way” for the “Seven Dirty Words” comic.

That’s one block from the Morningside Heights block where Carlin grew up — because the Catholic Church did not want his name displayed on the stretch where Corpus Christi Church is located.

...

The distaste was mutual: Carlin, who attended both the Corpus Christi Church and its school as a boy, once quipped, “I used to be Irish Catholic. Now I’m an American.”
78 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
George Carlin gets street named in his honor, after compromise with Catholic Church (Original Post) trotsky Jul 2014 OP
Tres cool cerveza_gratis Jul 2014 #1
I wasn't aware we needed to consult the church when naming streets they don't pay a dime for. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #2
That fucking church has waaay too much power. Arugula Latte Jul 2014 #3
News to me as well. n/t trotsky Jul 2014 #5
maybe they will take their tax dollars elsewhere! rurallib Jul 2014 #6
when naming a street here the city is required to get the views of the people on that street. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #7
And the renaming was effectively blocked by the protestations of ONE of them Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #8
Realistically politicians will not go up against a church in this city unless they will win. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #9
Is-Ought Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #13
Ok but the church has a right to an opinion. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #14
Did I say they didn't? Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #17
No but the chur h will always play a part in this city. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #20
I already addressed that point by posting the definition of the Is-Ought fallacy. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #24
I respect your opinion. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #27
The man swam in the East River. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #32
Good point. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #33
Doubtful. He grew up on the West Side. rug Jul 2014 #47
ROFL! He swam in RAW SEWAGE. longship Jul 2014 #78
Individual catholics have the right to an opinion. "The church" doesn't. mr blur Jul 2014 #65
residents of the block get a say and the church got one. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #66
Do you think The Humanist Association would object to naming their street Benedict XVI Drive? rug Jul 2014 #67
Did Benny grow up on that street? Lordquinton Jul 2014 #68
And if he did? rug Jul 2014 #70
More of less as an aside Fortinbras Armstrong Jul 2014 #73
That's pretty funny. rug Jul 2014 #74
Churches don't pay taxes that upkeep that road, so they technically aren't 'on' that street at all. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #10
Yeah you try selling that in this ciity. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #11
Well, I wouldn't change it to 'satans butthole' or anything that wouldn't pass muster on any other AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #15
I understand your pov but in this city churches play a vital role. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #18
'Vital role'. Que? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #21
Churches in this city pick up the slack where the government doesn't for poor people. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #25
And that entitles them to naming rights for streets? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #26
The city asks residents of the street their opninion. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #29
Does it ask renters and other entities that pay nothing for the upkeep of the right of way? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #34
Yes it does. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #35
Where would I find evidence of that? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #39
I don't know the city website to find it but I can tell you from personal experience as a renter hrmjustin Jul 2014 #40
So renters don't pay anything for upkeep? goldent Jul 2014 #71
Directly? No, they don't. The property owner pays. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #72
"Satan's Anus" has a more melodic ring to it ... Arugula Latte Jul 2014 #53
Reminds me of another melody. rug Jul 2014 #54
Why should they have any control over something they make everyone else pay for? AlbertCat Jul 2014 #75
Rev. Dr. Samuel B. McKinney Avenue rug Jul 2014 #12
And? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #16
I bet he didn't pay taxes either. rug Jul 2014 #19
And? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #22
The members of that church do. okasha Jul 2014 #37
EVERYONE pays for it. And does new york do it differently? That's usually via property taxes. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #41
The church members okasha Jul 2014 #44
Not unless the state of New York is doing something really weird. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #45
In this case, it's the City of New York, a raucous, tolerant and diverse city. rug Jul 2014 #46
Irrelevant info is irrelevant. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #50
Considering this city is larger than your entire state, yes. rug Jul 2014 #52
That's not an answer. Does it allocate funds differently? AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #55
It is the answer. They allocate funds after listening to its people. rug Jul 2014 #57
Still not answering my question. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #58
First of all, naming this street cost no more than the cost of the sign. rug Jul 2014 #60
The church's objection to the name is based on Carlin's criticism of the church. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #64
Again, if EVERYONE pays for access to that street, okasha Jul 2014 #48
They pay part of it. Don't pretend I'm not paying too. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #49
Hmmmm. okasha Jul 2014 #51
If it says "objection is to the presence of the church at all." then you are hearing things. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #56
So if I belong to a gym edhopper Jul 2014 #42
Is either your gym or your workplace okasha Jul 2014 #43
Is the Catholic Church edhopper Jul 2014 #59
Rug can tell you more okasha Jul 2014 #62
Did Billy grahm grow up on that drive? Lordquinton Jul 2014 #69
I will have to take the A train to go and see it this summer. hrmjustin Jul 2014 #4
UPDATE: Clerical error puts Catholic church on NYC street named for comic George Carlin trotsky Jul 2014 #23
NOW it all makes sense. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #28
HAHAHA! trotsky Jul 2014 #31
whoopsie Act_of_Reparation Jul 2014 #30
Nice!! RIP Goerge. EvilAL Jul 2014 #36
Carlin: "“I used to be Irish Catholic. Now I’m an American." Dawson Leery Jul 2014 #38
"You know; you grow" FiveGoodMen Jul 2014 #61
Another one, Hoppy Jul 2014 #63
That is a very old quote from his more mellow days. CBGLuthier Jul 2014 #76
Any movie with George Carlin in it is intellectual entertainment. Manifestor_of_Light Jul 2014 #77

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
2. I wasn't aware we needed to consult the church when naming streets they don't pay a dime for.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 10:28 AM
Jul 2014

Obviously, I was mistaken.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
7. when naming a street here the city is required to get the views of the people on that street.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 10:54 AM
Jul 2014

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
8. And the renaming was effectively blocked by the protestations of ONE of them
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 12:40 PM
Jul 2014

Seems to me as if that is something of an influence imbalance.

But, going further, I would argue that there are valid reasons to oppose the renaming of a street. "He had a potty mouth" isn't one of them.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
9. Realistically politicians will not go up against a church in this city unless they will win.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 12:42 PM
Jul 2014

The street naming process is hard enough when you don't have a controversial figure. When there is controversy it is next to impossible.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
24. I already addressed that point by posting the definition of the Is-Ought fallacy.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jul 2014

I repeat: because things are done a certain way doesn't mean they should continue to be done that way.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
32. The man swam in the East River.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jul 2014

He deserves a street named after him just for that.

In all seriousness, though, the point I'm trying to make here is that just because there is a demonstrable tradition of things being done in such a manner is not itself a justification for continuing to do things that way. Regardless of the Church's history in NYC, how the Church currently operates in NYC, or how unlikely it is that things will change, it is still worth discussing whether or not things should continue that way.

Just because Church is entrenched in municipal politics doesn't mean we should throw our arms up in resignation.

 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
65. Individual catholics have the right to an opinion. "The church" doesn't.
Fri Jul 11, 2014, 03:55 PM
Jul 2014

Street names cannot be decided on whether or not someone was afraid of the RCC.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
66. residents of the block get a say and the church got one.
Fri Jul 11, 2014, 04:58 PM
Jul 2014

I personally would have been proud to have his name on my block.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
67. Do you think The Humanist Association would object to naming their street Benedict XVI Drive?
Fri Jul 11, 2014, 05:03 PM
Jul 2014

Do you think the city should ask them?

Fortinbras Armstrong

(4,477 posts)
73. More of less as an aside
Mon Jul 14, 2014, 08:13 AM
Jul 2014

My wife and I own an apartment in Italy, in a town near Perugia. It is on the Piazza Karl Marx. (Umbria used to be a communist stronghold.) We looked at one in the same town on the Piazza John XXIII, but the marxist one was better.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
74. That's pretty funny.
Mon Jul 14, 2014, 10:21 AM
Jul 2014

Here's one of the best songs that came from the Italian Communist partisans.



Bella Ciao (Goodbye, Beloved0

Una mattina mi son svegliato
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
Una mattina mi son svegliato
Eo ho trovato l'invasor

O partigiano porta mi via
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
O partigiano porta mi via
Che mi sento di morir

E se io muoio da partigiano
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
E se io muoio da partigiano
Tu mi devi seppellir

Mi seppellire lassù in montagna
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
Mi seppellire lassù in montagna
Sotto l'ombra di un bel fiore

E le genti che passeranno
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
E le genti che passeranno
Mi diranno: "Che bel fior"

È questo il fiore del partigiano
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
È questo il fiore del partigiano
Morto per la libertà


One morning I woke up
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
One morning I woke up
And I found the invader

Oh partisan, carry me away,
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
Oh partisan, carry me away,
For I feel I'm dying

And if I die as a partisan
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
And if I die as a partisan
You have to bury me

But bury me up in the mountain
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao,
But bury me up in the mountain
Under the shadow of a beautiful flower

And the people who will pass by
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao,
And the people who will pass by
Will say to me: "what a beautiful flower"

This is the flower of the partisan
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao
This is the flower of the partisan
Who died for freedom

Italians can make a love story out of class struggle.


AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
10. Churches don't pay taxes that upkeep that road, so they technically aren't 'on' that street at all.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 12:43 PM
Jul 2014

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
15. Well, I wouldn't change it to 'satans butthole' or anything that wouldn't pass muster on any other
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 12:57 PM
Jul 2014

city street, much like there are constraints on custom license plates.

But no, I wouldn't expect them to have any input whatsoever. Why would they? Why should they have any control over something they make everyone else pay for?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
18. I understand your pov but in this city churches play a vital role.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:00 PM
Jul 2014

The fact is the city does not go ahead with street namings unless there is no opposition. Only in rare occasions has the city gone ahead sith street namings.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
29. The city asks residents of the street their opninion.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:30 PM
Jul 2014

The city took their opinion into account.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
34. Does it ask renters and other entities that pay nothing for the upkeep of the right of way?
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:53 PM
Jul 2014
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
40. I don't know the city website to find it but I can tell you from personal experience as a renter
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jul 2014

I was sent a questionnaire about naming my street after s 9/11 victim.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
72. Directly? No, they don't. The property owner pays.
Sun Jul 13, 2014, 09:46 PM
Jul 2014

In fact, if the property owner fails to pay said taxes, the renter has to vamoose as well, when the property owner loses it to the state or city.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
75. Why should they have any control over something they make everyone else pay for?
Mon Jul 14, 2014, 04:30 PM
Jul 2014

Exactly.

They coulda gotten enough catholics that live on and contribute to the upkeep of the road to oppose it.... or could they?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
22. And?
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jul 2014

You're mixing issues. The name is not actually related to the upkeep of the road upon which XYZ citizens, commercial zones and whatnot connect to.

Pretty sure the greek god for which the street I was raised on didn't pay any taxes either.
Nor did he get any input into the naming rights.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
37. The members of that church do.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:23 PM
Jul 2014

So do the staff and the clergy, every time they make a personal purchase.

Most cities require consultation with residents on street renaming. Would you be okay with having your own street renamed Billy Graham Drive? Somehow Ihink you'd object.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
41. EVERYONE pays for it. And does new york do it differently? That's usually via property taxes.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jul 2014

I'd object to a Billy Graham Dr. by my house. But I pay for access to that street. The church doesn't. Their members pay no more or less than any other resident. And as such they should have no more or less say, for those that actually *live on that street*, of which not all church members do.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
44. The church members
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:15 PM
Jul 2014

pay for access to the street in front of the church.

Since you say that EVERYONE pays for it, should every resident of the city be consulted?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
45. Not unless the state of New York is doing something really weird.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:22 PM
Jul 2014

Here in WA, the property owner connected to the street pays. Except the fucking piece of shit church down the street from my house. You know the 1.2 million dollar piece of property that pays no property taxes. *I* pay for their street access, as that fund comes out of everyone's property taxes. Since the church doesn't pitch in, everyone who DOES pay, pays slightly more to maintain that stretch of road un-funded by the church.

I would be very surprised if NY did it differently.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
50. Irrelevant info is irrelevant.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:00 PM
Jul 2014

Does this municipality allocate funds for road access differently?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
52. Considering this city is larger than your entire state, yes.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:02 PM
Jul 2014

The City government, particulalry DiBlasio, listens.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
55. That's not an answer. Does it allocate funds differently?
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:24 PM
Jul 2014

IE, do churches pay property taxes. Is road access funded in some manner other than property taxes?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
57. It is the answer. They allocate funds after listening to its people.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:27 PM
Jul 2014

All the people. Citizen, non-citizen, taxpayer, non-taxpayer, landlord, tenant, stocbroker, disabled, and, as in this case, believers and non-believers.

It rains there a lot less too.











+,

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
58. Still not answering my question.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:31 PM
Jul 2014

Do funds for road access come from a source other than property taxes?

Gas tax, income tax, B&O tax, etc? How does the money arrive at the contractor or city workers fixing/maintaining the roads?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
60. First of all, naming this street cost no more than the cost of the sign.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:36 PM
Jul 2014

Second of all, payment of taxes is not a prerequisite for having a voice, the Boston Tea Party, and the current Tea Party notwithstanding.

Third, the public honoring of a local resident of a neighborhood, after giving due consideration to the opinions of all in that neighborhood, is a good thing, one this City does well.

Why don't you just admit your objection is not based on church/state but is based on religion?

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
64. The church's objection to the name is based on Carlin's criticism of the church.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 08:22 PM
Jul 2014

So, sorta relevant, methinks.

I don't think the church should have any more input than anything else. Again, I point to license plate standards. It's either true for all as offensive/not offensive, or it is not.

Edit: You are aware the story has been updated, yes?

okasha

(11,573 posts)
48. Again, if EVERYONE pays for access to that street,
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:38 PM
Jul 2014

so do the church members.

Seems to me that your real objection is to the presence of the church at all.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
49. They pay part of it. Don't pretend I'm not paying too.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 06:57 PM
Jul 2014

Only about 400 people use that church. That road access cost is spread across all property tax payers in the municipality. (Plus all the other churches.)

"Seems to me that your real objection is to the presence of the church at all."

Quit making up total horseshit. If it paid for road access, water runoff management, EMS, Police, Fire, all the city services I pay for through my property taxes, that the church consumes, I wouldn't have a problem with it. It doesn't. I pay for mine, and a share of that church's costs as well. And that, is bullshit.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
56. If it says "objection is to the presence of the church at all." then you are hearing things.
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:26 PM
Jul 2014

I don't care about it any more or less than the porn shop. I don't use it. It's not my thing. Don't care.

Difference is, as a property tax payer, I am directly subsidizing one of those two establishments.

edhopper

(37,369 posts)
42. So if I belong to a gym
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 04:26 PM
Jul 2014

I should have a say if they rename the street it is on?

What about the street where I work, do I have a say, or only the business owner?

okasha

(11,573 posts)
43. Is either your gym or your workplace
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jul 2014

a membership organization in the corporate sense? Ie., is the gym or business owner required to seek consent of members to policy decisions? Are employees considered members of the business corporation, or is membership vested only in a board of directors and/or stockholders? Or is the business a "closely held" private corporation with a very small number of stockholders and no stock offered to the public.?

edhopper

(37,369 posts)
59. Is the Catholic Church
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 07:32 PM
Jul 2014

Required to seek consent from it's members for policy? New one for me.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
62. Rug can tell you more
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 08:04 PM
Jul 2014

about current administrative parish mechanisms than I can. But the laity do most certainly have ways of exerting control. Way back before Vatican II, a local parish cut off their priest's salary when their budget committee arrived at the rectory for a meeting and found a half-dozen bottles of expensive booze on the credenza.

That got his attention.

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
69. Did Billy grahm grow up on that drive?
Sat Jul 12, 2014, 04:59 PM
Jul 2014

Does he have an actual, physical connection to that street? If not your example is a bad one.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
23. UPDATE: Clerical error puts Catholic church on NYC street named for comic George Carlin
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 01:17 PM
Jul 2014
http://www.calgaryherald.com/entertainment/Clerical+error+puts+Catholic+church+street+named+comic/10017663/story.html
NEW YORK, N.Y. - A bureaucratic error has put a Catholic church on a New York City street named after comedian George Carlin.

...

Under a compromise, one block was to be named after Carlin — not the block where the church is.

George Carlin Way became official Wednesday. Due to a clerical error it's two blocks long and includes the church.

City officials say the mistake will be corrected.


 

Hoppy

(3,595 posts)
63. Another one,
Thu Jul 10, 2014, 08:13 PM
Jul 2014

I used to be a Catholic until I reached the age of reason.


-- Still, I recall reading that he gave substantial contributions to his Catholic Alma Mater.

CBGLuthier

(12,723 posts)
76. That is a very old quote from his more mellow days.
Mon Jul 14, 2014, 04:37 PM
Jul 2014

In his later years he would tell them what he really thought of their invisible man in the sky who "loves" you.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
77. Any movie with George Carlin in it is intellectual entertainment.
Mon Jul 14, 2014, 04:48 PM
Jul 2014

Like "Car Wash".

Where's Buddy Christ???

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»George Carlin gets street...