Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 05:02 PM Sep 2014

Human Nature and the Fruits of Faith

Forget dogma—living a richer, fuller life is the true goal of religion.



'Varieties of Religious Experience' (1902) by William James Yao Xiao

To write a masterly book on the contentious subject of religion without taking a partisan position is a remarkable achievement. William James, the philosopher, scientist, psychologist, brought it off with a lambent lucidity in 1901-02, when he delivered the Gifford Lectures on Natural Religion in Edinburgh and later published them under the title "Varieties of Religious Experience, A Study in Human Nature" (1902).

William James was, of course, the 15-months-older brother of the novelist Henry James, and the eldest of the five children—four sons and a daughter—of Henry James Sr. and his wife, Alice. The Brontes produced three sisters who all wrote remarkable novels, but no family that I know of, other than that of William and Henry James, produced two brothers who were geniuses in their own right yet vastly different from one another in the nature and style of their thinking. Which of the two brothers one admires more may tell a great deal about the cast of one's own mind.

In delivering the Gifford Lectures, William James was wary of offending. Lord Gifford, the founder of the lecture series, was himself a seriously religious man. James's own religion was unknown. What position, the question must have been, would he take? Attacking religion? Endorsing it wholeheartedly? Surely it could not be possible to write a book on religion from an entirely neutral standpoint.

In his Gifford Lectures, James decided to exclude religious institutions or religion in its institutional settings. He chose not to argue, or even discuss, theology. He set aside the question of immortality, which he wrote about elsewhere in an essay called "Human Immortality" (1897), where he concluded that it would be "blindness" to rule it out as a possibility. He concentrated instead on the effect of religion on the individual, of its stirrings in the human heart.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/william-james-varieties-of-religious-experience-unique-message-1411767878

http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/wjames/varieties-rel-exp.pdf

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Human Nature and the Fruits of Faith (Original Post) rug Sep 2014 OP
Sounds like an interesting article. I can't read it without a subscription. - n/t Jim__ Sep 2014 #1
Hmmm, I'm hitting a paywall now too. rug Sep 2014 #2
James's book is excellent. okasha Sep 2014 #3
Yesterday I visited a friend edgineered Sep 2014 #5
Enjoy your dinner and get some rest. okasha Sep 2014 #6
I agree that might be the intent. AtheistCrusader Sep 2014 #4
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
2. Hmmm, I'm hitting a paywall now too.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 06:07 PM
Sep 2014

It must recognize a cookie. Sorry. I'll post an alternate link if I can find one. It's a sad day when the book the article is talking about is free on line but the article isn't.

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
5. Yesterday I visited a friend
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 11:58 PM
Sep 2014

who is a retired philosophy professor from the University of Florida. Prior to pursuing that career he spent two years at Milford outside Cincinnati. Jay is very interesting to talk to. Being I just got home from a grueling weekend and my dinner is almost ready that's all for now. Some time in the future we can talk some more.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
4. I agree that might be the intent.
Sun Sep 28, 2014, 09:28 PM
Sep 2014

But for some of us, the promises of religion are as 'rich' and 'full' as an empty sack.

I can understand that believers might feel the same about non-theism. Not precisely why they feel that way, but two sides of a coin, so to speak. After all, it must offer something to some people, or it wouldn't be so common.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Human Nature and the Frui...