Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What is your view on Non-Theistic Religions (Original Post) safeinOhio May 2015 OP
UU is the first "church" I've ever joined (voluntarily) in my 64 years CanonRay May 2015 #1
Same here safeinOhio May 2015 #2
Same here LiberalEsto May 2015 #5
Non-Gods to not believe in? immoderate May 2015 #3
Interesting. silverweb May 2015 #4
Perhaps it's pandaism LiberalEsto May 2015 #6
LOL silverweb Jun 2015 #22
There ya go! okasha Jun 2015 #33
Bamboo! Bamboo! LiberalEsto Jun 2015 #35
Those terms are rarely used TM99 May 2015 #10
Odd, indeed. silverweb Jun 2015 #24
Deist equivalents rogerashton Jun 2015 #27
I can imagine they do. silverweb Jun 2015 #29
Same as my view on theistic religions. cbayer May 2015 #7
Each to his, or hers, own is pretty good. safeinOhio May 2015 #11
I like your questions and your approach. cbayer May 2015 #14
Thank you, but safeinOhio May 2015 #16
If only you could just resolve that enormous problem about who gets to decide... trotsky Jun 2015 #23
Agreed! tech3149 Jun 2015 #28
I love where you have landed! cbayer Jun 2015 #30
Thanks! I'm pretty happy where I landed too. tech3149 Jun 2015 #32
Thanks for the link. I'm unfamiliar with a few of them. rug May 2015 #8
I come from Quakers that came here from England. I feel most at ease with them, but don't attend. freshwest May 2015 #9
I kind of like the idea of a service safeinOhio May 2015 #12
I think it would be called in other terms a gestalt. It was remarkable. freshwest May 2015 #19
+1,000 safeinOhio May 2015 #20
I really like the things the author says he likes about it. safeinOhio May 2015 #15
I carried a copy of theTao Te Ching as a teenager. It was a big influence on me. n/t freshwest May 2015 #17
I have always like the idea safeinOhio May 2015 #18
I think it has to do with choice. We are here, we can be dramatic, peaceful, full of angst or joy. freshwest May 2015 #21
Quakers are Christians and generally believe Warren Stupidity May 2015 #13
I was a non-theistic quaker... NeoGreen Jun 2015 #25
All of those are theistic. They all involve the belief in a deity of some kind. phantom power Jun 2015 #26
I think how it works is... gcomeau Jun 2015 #31
Not all... NeoGreen Jun 2015 #36
The truest words the writer of that article okasha Jun 2015 #34
Welcome back, okasha. n/t trotsky Jun 2015 #37
Though raised Catholic and still part of its cultural aspects I appreciate a larger spirituality. pinto Jun 2015 #38

CanonRay

(14,101 posts)
1. UU is the first "church" I've ever joined (voluntarily) in my 64 years
Sun May 31, 2015, 06:37 PM
May 2015

I'm very comfortable with the spirituality and the fellowship.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
4. Interesting.
Sun May 31, 2015, 06:58 PM
May 2015

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]When did "pantheism" and "panentheism" morph into "pandeism" and "panendeism"?

I'd never seen the latter terms until now.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
10. Those terms are rarely used
Sun May 31, 2015, 08:44 PM
May 2015

but they have been around since the 1800's.

It is a combination of pantheism and deism as well as panentheism and deism.

Not too many popular examples of it so it is rather odd that it is listed.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
24. Odd, indeed.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 11:57 AM
Jun 2015

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]The root words, "theos" and "deus," both simply mean "God," anyway.

The terms in the OP had me scratching my head in confusion for a bit.

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
27. Deist equivalents
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 01:06 PM
Jun 2015

of pantheism and panentheism. I have encountered them in deist discussions. But the boundary between gods and nongods gets very blurry here.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
7. Same as my view on theistic religions.
Sun May 31, 2015, 07:47 PM
May 2015

Each to his own, as long as it doesn't harm others.

What's your view?

safeinOhio

(32,676 posts)
11. Each to his, or hers, own is pretty good.
Sun May 31, 2015, 08:52 PM
May 2015

I do avoid those that push, pull or prod.

I personally don't think there are any correct or wrong answers, just interesting answers. I really don't have any answers to life's big questions, but do question all answers.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
23. If only you could just resolve that enormous problem about who gets to decide...
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 11:52 AM
Jun 2015

what "harm(ing) others" means. Dang that must sting to bring inconvenient details into your tidy little black-and-white theory. No wonder you never want to talk about it.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
28. Agreed!
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 02:09 PM
Jun 2015

I was raised in a traditional protestant theology but divested myself from it through a study of other beliefs and historical research on the basis for those beliefs. Add to that a healthy investment in the study of philosophy.
I would qualify my current belief as a more naturalist conception of a "creator". It may be a cruel fucking joke but I think the "creator" established a universe based on certain guidelines and just let it go hog wild. We can either live or die based on our own choices or willingness to expand our understanding of the world.
I don't know or care if I will have an afterlife, I just want to make the most of this one.
For me, any so called religions tenant that presents anyone as being "less than" because of their belief is just plain wrong.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
30. I love where you have landed!
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 03:31 PM
Jun 2015

It's is my sincere belief that most people follow their own unique path and end up in their own unique place.

I'm with you. The best position is that no one is "less than" simply because they believe or don't' believe. It's only when their beliefs translate into actions that can harm others that it matters.

Great post, tech 3149.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
32. Thanks! I'm pretty happy where I landed too.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 09:46 PM
Jun 2015

There have been many ups and downs along the way. I got to share 29 years with one of the best women on the planet. When I decided to quit being a wage slave I got the privilege of assuring my parents could be as independent as possible until they passed.
I may not have been phenomenally successful by accepted standards but I am more than satisfied, and in some sense pleased, with what I've done with my life.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
9. I come from Quakers that came here from England. I feel most at ease with them, but don't attend.
Sun May 31, 2015, 08:07 PM
May 2015

It is the reason they came here.

The only war my family was in was WW2 IIRC, but were here long before the Revolution.

My dad didn't want to join the service in WW2, but after Pearl Harbor it was inevitable he or one of his brothers would have to join. So he enlisted to spare his older brothers with children.

I've only been with Quakers as part of the anti-war movement and a prayer session with them in later years. It was like nothing else I've ever done. Special.

Everything in the link from your link applies to my thinking:

Quakerism

https://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Philosophy/god_theorem/god_theorem/node25.html

Thanks for posting this.

safeinOhio

(32,676 posts)
12. I kind of like the idea of a service
Sun May 31, 2015, 08:54 PM
May 2015

where everyone sits quietly without a word being said.

"No talking, singing or chewing gum, the Friends service has begun"

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
19. I think it would be called in other terms a gestalt. It was remarkable.
Sun May 31, 2015, 09:27 PM
May 2015
Definition of a gestalt:

1.) a configuration, pattern, or organized field having specific properties that cannot be derived from the summation of its component parts; a unified whole.

2.) an instance or example of such a unified whole.


Perhaps an organized field is the term I'm looking for here, IDK.

It created a sense intense joy, timeless and without any feeling of being confined by space. But there was nothing mindless in it, because it was all voluntary. I sensed time and space around me, but wanted the freedom.

safeinOhio

(32,676 posts)
15. I really like the things the author says he likes about it.
Sun May 31, 2015, 09:06 PM
May 2015

My favorite scripture verse is from the Tao Te Ching.

The Tao that is spoken of is not the eternal Tao.

While language is helpful, it tends to distort. In other words, words can not describe what words can not describe.

safeinOhio

(32,676 posts)
18. I have always like the idea
Sun May 31, 2015, 09:27 PM
May 2015

of the mutual interdependence of polar opposites.

Up down
good bad
cold hot

each depends on its opposite and can not exist without it. Works for God, devil. Saint, sinner. Love, hate.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
21. I think it has to do with choice. We are here, we can be dramatic, peaceful, full of angst or joy.
Sun May 31, 2015, 09:52 PM
May 2015

Perhaps they are developmental stages we all go through. It's said that whatever troubles us in life, will re-appear, especially if we hate it, because we have not yet learned how to respond.

So the universe presents it until we learn or have mastered it, then comes the next challenge. It's like crawling to standing to walk, we forget the struggle of one stage we go to the next.

Another thing I think about are the games we play with each other for mental entertainment. DU is such an example. But we are to stay within the rules, or else others will see the game and quit. Such as people don't respond unless they see a conflict as it's interesting. Win or lose is a game.

As Kipling said in the poem IF:

If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster

And treat those two impostors just the same...


At times I seek to leave political discourse, go onto to something higher. But I keep coming back, because real lives are affected. So it's very compelling game, so much so that it doesn't seem to be a game at all.

This is utterly forbidden.

Our lives are the result of the choices we and others make. What freedom it would be to not have to choose - that is the point I think many people have fallen for in other ways.

When I see someone who is dead set in some course or belief, and they say 'God said so, I believe it, and that's that,' They are in denial.

They know better. I think that happens at the point at which their brain gets tired, or they don't know, so they just left the choice to other people or things.

Kind of like the quote:

Destiny is the scapegoat that we make responsible for our crimes. ~ Balfour

I don't believe that. I think we are responsible.





 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
13. Quakers are Christians and generally believe
Sun May 31, 2015, 09:00 PM
May 2015

in a more or less standard Christian deity. There are non-theistic Quakers but they are a minority.

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)
36. Not all...
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 09:53 AM
Jun 2015

... UU does not require a deity, and openly welcomes, embraces and includes atheists.

UU has no creed of required belief.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
34. The truest words the writer of that article
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 10:37 PM
Jun 2015

ever typed were "I have no idea" in regard to First Nations cultures.

I am so damn fucking glad to learn that "ritual cannibalism has faded" among my people.

pinto

(106,886 posts)
38. Though raised Catholic and still part of its cultural aspects I appreciate a larger spirituality.
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 12:31 PM
Jun 2015

That sense of the parts being greater than the whole in some way. And each individual's questioning. I like the comments above about the questions being as important, if not more so, than the answers. They lead somewhere. And for each of us that may be different.

Robert Frost touched on it, I think, in his own New England taciturn style -

The Road Not Taken
By Robert Frost


Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,

And sorry I could not travel both

And be one traveler, long I stood

And looked down one as far as I could

To where it bent in the undergrowth;


Then took the other, as just as fair,

And having perhaps the better claim,

Because it was grassy and wanted wear;

Though as for that the passing there

Had worn them really about the same,


And both that morning equally lay

In leaves no step had trodden black.

Oh, I kept the first for another day!

Yet knowing how way leads on to way,

I doubted if I should ever come back.


I shall be telling this with a sigh

Somewhere ages and ages hence:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—

I took the one less traveled by,

And that has made all the difference.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»What is your view on Non-...