Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:11 AM Aug 2015

When Christians Asked People to Describe God in Three Words, the Plan Backfired

The Missouri State University chapter of Cru (Campus Crusade for Christ) recently asked students to tell them “what 3 words they’d use to describe God”.

One of those students wanted to know what this was all about, so she attended their meeting last night. After singing worship songs and hearing announcements, a group leader revealed a word cloud with the most popular responses from the survey.

“There was an audible gasp,” says the tipster:



You can see a giant “Fake” right in the middle. It’s surrounded by “racist,” “myth,” “egotistical,” “imaginary,” “delusion,” “controlling,” “sadistic,” and “narcissistic.”

Looks about right, don’t you think?

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/08/28/when-christians-asked-people-to-describe-god-in-three-words-the-plan-backfired/
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Christians Asked People to Describe God in Three Words, the Plan Backfired (Original Post) cleanhippie Aug 2015 OP
Can't believe they didn't rig it to get rid of negatives. xfundy Aug 2015 #1
Right? And now the haters will be along to sling personal attacks for even posting it. cleanhippie Aug 2015 #3
You have something in common with them. rug Aug 2015 #2
I sure have something in common with them. dieter Aug 2015 #20
Did you notice "egotistical" in that word cloud? rug Aug 2015 #22
Spelling isn't their strong suit I guess. dieter Aug 2015 #23
these clowns are so silly SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #42
^^^LOOK RIGHT HERE FOLKS, PERSONAL ATTACKS FOR NO GOOD REASON^^^^ cleanhippie Aug 2015 #4
How unfair. You've never used such words to describe God. rug Aug 2015 #5
^^^NOTICE HOW THE SERIAL PERSONAL ATTACKER DOUBLES DOWN^^^ cleanhippie Aug 2015 #6
So, have you used those words to describe God and believers? rug Aug 2015 #7
Yes and pretty MyNameGoesHere Aug 2015 #16
See Post 3, which set him off. rug Aug 2015 #18
Aw, you mad you can't alert for another ~13 hours? AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #24
! cleanhippie Aug 2015 #28
What are you talkimng about? rug Aug 2015 #29
I have no idea what I'm talkimng about, clearly. AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #31
for once we agree SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #35
Who 'we'? AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #36
i agreed with you SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #41
The farce is weak with that one. Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #17
About what I expected from people of faith. We have our doubts as well. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #8
I think we're supposed to post in all caps. rug Aug 2015 #9
We can channel Mark. hrmjustin Aug 2015 #10
not surprising SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #11
Sampling frame Fairgo Aug 2015 #30
nice post - but... SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #34
'Flimsy Deflections' for 100, Pat? AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #37
wasted time... SoLeftIAmRight Aug 2015 #40
Hey he's got an "implied hypothesis". Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #44
That's much better than an explicit bias. rug Aug 2015 #46
Recc'd! snort Aug 2015 #12
Oops. progressoid Aug 2015 #13
Patheos is one of my favorite websites (partial to Fred Clark's blog), so I checked out your link. classof56 Aug 2015 #14
Omnipresent fake forgiving racist...sounds like an American God. One seen in a mirror. n/t jtuck004 Aug 2015 #15
Ouch! lindysalsagal Aug 2015 #32
Well, after all, God was made in man's image. AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #38
Looks about correct to me. SoapBox Aug 2015 #19
Can't believe they left out "murderer" nichomachus Aug 2015 #21
This gives me hope for the future. Deadshot Aug 2015 #25
Hmm. davidthegnome Aug 2015 #26
The words were generated about the God of the abrahamic bible. AtheistCrusader Aug 2015 #39
Especially the middle one. Iggo Aug 2015 #43
Sheesh. It wasn't an attempt to insult anyone. Warren Stupidity Aug 2015 #45
Amazing how three words surround the response Leontius Aug 2015 #27
There's no pleasing the surly. rug Aug 2015 #33

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
1. Can't believe they didn't rig it to get rid of negatives.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 10:48 AM
Aug 2015

Like the "surveys" at onenewsnow.com. They'll know better next time they take that show on the road.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
3. Right? And now the haters will be along to sling personal attacks for even posting it.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:10 AM
Aug 2015

Oh, look, they've already arrived. How expected.

 

dieter

(94 posts)
20. I sure have something in common with them.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 12:45 PM
Aug 2015

I would certainly describe the fantasy god-man in the sky as:

Fake, racist, myth, egotistical, imaginary, delusion, controlling, sadistic, and narcissistic among other terms.

 

dieter

(94 posts)
23. Spelling isn't their strong suit I guess.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 12:54 PM
Aug 2015

Actually, you'll have to point out where it is. I can't find in the graphic or the OP.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
4. ^^^LOOK RIGHT HERE FOLKS, PERSONAL ATTACKS FOR NO GOOD REASON^^^^
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:13 AM
Aug 2015

Not a word about the OP, just a personal attack for daring to post something showing the truth about how people feel.

Notice who the offender is. Look around and you will see this is a common occurrence. Such naked hatred for anyone that dare criticize religion in any way.

Are we surprised? I'm not.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
5. How unfair. You've never used such words to describe God.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:18 AM
Aug 2015

Or DUers who believe in God.

Your predictability is stale.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
6. ^^^NOTICE HOW THE SERIAL PERSONAL ATTACKER DOUBLES DOWN^^^
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:20 AM
Aug 2015

Unable to contain himself, the pathological need to attack anyone who posts something he doesn't like is too powerful to overcome.


So sad, really, to be filled with so much hatred.


And knowing that a last-word compulsion also exists for this personal attacker, I'll oblige him and let all of DU see him for what he really is.


On edit: See, I told you! That last-word compulsion is a deep need, I guess.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
7. So, have you used those words to describe God and believers?
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:22 AM
Aug 2015

A simple yes or no will do.

Or you can continue your alert trolling.

I'll wait.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
17. The farce is weak with that one.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 12:17 PM
Aug 2015

It seems it is bigoted to report that many people, when asked, describe God as fake.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
8. About what I expected from people of faith. We have our doubts as well.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:30 AM
Aug 2015

Really n8t surprising at all.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
9. I think we're supposed to post in all caps.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:32 AM
Aug 2015

You know, because it's alarming.

And significant.

 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
11. not surprising
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 11:44 AM
Aug 2015

1/2 the people are below average and most of the rest are not far from that mark

ask average people silly questions and you get average answers that do nothing but show average thinking

this says more about thinking than reality

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
30. Sampling frame
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 06:40 PM
Aug 2015

This word cloud was generated from a convenience sample of college students by a group with a built-in threat to validity given their bias towards faith over reason, and belief in a specific diety with predetermined attributes. In regards to your nod to the mean, you are correct in that it more-or-less reflects the world view of the sample, which happens to be college students. But college students are, as a group, above the population mean in terms of knowledge, intelligence, and thinking skills...especially in contrast to the surrounding milieu. You would actually expect this outcome given the sampling frame. There is an inverse correlation between reason and the fear of god. At least that is my theory. Easy to test. If your implied hypothesis is correct, if I understand it (the correlation between positive god attributes and intelligence/knowledge/critical thinking skills is positive), then we would expect to see the cloud shift in the opposite direction from my prediction, given comparisons to general population, or in an ex post facto analysis of within-group differences.

Interesting. I bet the literature is already out there.

classof56

(5,376 posts)
14. Patheos is one of my favorite websites (partial to Fred Clark's blog), so I checked out your link.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 12:09 PM
Aug 2015

Scrolled through the comments and I'm inclined to agree with the one opining that perhaps Cru was using this list as a springboard for evangelizing. For me, a long-time Baptist well entrenched in evangelical circles, until I wasn't, this tactic makes sense, though there is a lot of 'splaining to do about God, given the accuracy of so many of those negative adjectives. I'm now pretty much ambivalent about God, mostly convinced he/she doesn't exist. My spouse, however, who at this very moment is at an atheist group's gathering, would choose the Big Blue Fake in the center of the word cloud. I'll be checking the Friendly Atheist posts on Patheos more often on my future visits. I'm what you might call a Seeker.

Cheers.

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
26. Hmm.
Sat Aug 29, 2015, 01:24 PM
Aug 2015

A whole lot of those words could be used to describe any number of people, religious or secular. Me, I'm on the fence regarding the whole god issue, agnostic, or gnostic, or whatever the right word is when you basically believe that "I don't know, you don't know, there's no real way of knowing for sure, so I'm not sure either way."

I have known some really wonderful Christians (usually not the evangelical type) who would give you the shirts off their backs if you had a need. Sure, some of them would do this because they believed good deeds would get them into heaven... but others, for much the same reasons I would. The golden rule. Some times I think we forget that "Christianity" is not a bad thing. The Christ of the bible I think, was very much like we here strive to be. Generous, compassionate, forgiving, loving - peaceful. One of my favorite bible stories when I was younger was the one about him knocking over the money-lenders table.

I think this looks like a (poor) flashy attempt to insult certain people and their intelligence. Yeah, there are plenty of stupid so called Christians, plenty that have the wrong ideas about just about everything. Yet I have known many of great integrity, compassion, intelligence and even wisdom. I was lucky to witness many good examples of "good Christianity" growing up. Priests who weren't just priests, but decent men too. Strong women who, while not believing the bull shit dogma or swallowing the whole doctrine, had faith in humanity as great as their faith in a higher power.

I won't say yes or no, and it doesn't matter to me as much as what I do in this life. What I leave behind me, the kindness and compassion I either give or receive in this world, regardless of whether there is another afterwards. I will say though, that if we of the Agnostic or atheist persuasion wish to be respected or treated with tolerance and/or compassion by the religious, then it would be good if we gave them the same consideration.

All kinds of terrible things have been done in the name of God... but good things too. Charity, chiefly among them - and when you have benefited from that charity, or when your family has, it makes it much more difficult to turn your nose at ALL Christians. This broad brush generalization approach is, frankly, inaccurate and kind of stupid.

Three words? I don't know.

Neither do any of the rest of us.. but for those that are convinced they do, I will offer them respect and compassion as long as they offer me the same. Your list of words above... I would say, pertains more to humanity overall than any specific group.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
39. The words were generated about the God of the abrahamic bible.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 12:17 AM
Aug 2015

Not about Christians. Or even the 2.0 of just Christ by himself.

The God of the Old Testament fits every single allegation on that screen so far as I can tell

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
45. Sheesh. It wasn't an attempt to insult anyone.
Sun Aug 30, 2015, 09:29 AM
Aug 2015

The attempt was to build a word cloud of people's description of God. You find the results insulting, which is a perfect example of religious privilege.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»When Christians Asked Peo...