Bangladesh intellectuals speak against Isalmist extremists

[rug]

Photo: Zakir Hossain Chowdhury / Barcroft Media via Getty Images

CATCH TEAM@catchnews | 4 May 2016, 13:56 PM IST

Bangladesh has been on the boil for some time due to growing intolerance towards atheists and religious minorities. Several liberal bloggers have been murdered by radical Islamists.

Now several intellectuals and civil society actors have come together to condemn this atmosphere of vitriol. Take a look at their statement:

-----

Protect the rights to freedom of religion, belief, and expression.

Statement on attacks on atheists, secularists, and religious minorities in Bangladesh

May 3, 2016

We, the undersigned academics, intellectuals, human rights advocates, and organizations from Bangladesh and around the world, unequivocally condemn recent statements by Bangladesh government officials appearing to blame writers, publishers, and activists for their own deaths at the hands of violent extremists with suspected links to militant Islamist groups. We strongly urge the Bangladesh government to immediately take steps to vigorously protect the rights to freedom of religion, belief, and expression, both in word and in deed.

Since February 2015, there have been six deadly attacks on atheist, humanist, and secularist writers, bloggers, and publishers in Bangladesh, all by machete-wielding militants. On February 26, 2015, Avijit Roy, founder of the freethought forum Mukto-Mona, was killed while leaving a book fair, which he was visiting with his wife, author and activist Rafida Bonya Ahmed. Ahmed survived, but was seriously injured. On March 30, 2015, Washiqur Rahman was killed by a group of extremists while on his way to work. On May 12, 2015, Ananta Bijoy Das was killed in the same fashion. On August 7, 2015, Niloy Neel was killed when six men tricked their way into Niloy's home, locked his partner in a room, and hacked Niloy to death. On October 31, 2015, Faisal Arefin Deepan, a Muslim publisher of secularist books, was killed at his publishing house. The same day, three others - Ahmedur Rashid Tutul, Tariq Rahim, and Ranadipam Basu - were seriously injured in a similar attack at another publishing house. And, on April 6, 2016, law student Nazimuddin Samad was attacked and killed while returning home from class.

Religious believers, LGBT rights activists, and university professors have also been subjected to threats and violent attacks. Between October and December 2015, 37 Christian leaders received death threats. On November 27, 2015, gunmen attacked a Shia mosque, killing one and injuring three. On December 25, 2015, a suicide bomber injured three at an Ahmadi mosque. On February 21, militants killed a Hindu priest and injured a devotee. On March 15, 2016, a Shia cleric was killed. On April 23, 2016, university English professor Rezaul Karim Siddique was hacked to death on his way to work. On April 24, another Hindu devotee was killed. On April 25, 2016, Xulhaz Mannan, editor of Bangladesh's first LGBT magazine, and a fellow LGBT rights activist and theatre artist, Mahbub Tanay, were stabbed to death. And on April 30, 2016, a Hindu tailor previously arrested and jailed for allegedly making derogatory comments about the Prophet Muhammad, was hacked to death.

While some of these attacks have been claimed by native terrorist groups such as Ansarullah Bangla Team and Ansar-al Islam, the Bangladesh branch of Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent, others have been claimed by Daesh (ISIL). The response from the Bangladesh government to these attacks has been extremely disappointing; the response to attacks on atheists and secular activists has been particularly disheartening. No one has yet been held to account for the killings. While some arrests have been made, few charges have been filed against the perpetrators. Some threatened atheists and secularists, who are on public hit lists released by militant Islamist groups suspected in ongoing attacks, have been told to self-censor or go into exile when requesting assistance from law enforcement. Many activists are also hesitant to approach the police, fearing that they could be charged under the Information, Communications, and Technology Act, which criminalizes writings that hurt religious belief. Government officials have failed to take action to help protect and support threatened atheists or secularists, or publicly condemn the killings. Officials have instead distanced themselves from the victims, or even appeared to blame the deceased for their own murders.

After the murder of Niloy Neel, Prime Minister Hasina stated, "You can't attack someone else's religion. You'll have to stop doing this. It won't be tolerated if someone else's religious sentiment is hurt." After the recent murder of Nazimuddin Samad, Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan stated that part of the investigation would be "to see whether he has written anything objectionable in his blogs," implying that would provide some justification for Samad's death. Minister Khan would also state, "The bloggers, they should control their writing. ... I want to say that people should be careful not to hurt anyone by writing anything - hurt any religion, any people's beliefs, any religious leaders." Just days later, Prime Minister Hasina shared similar sentiments, stating in regards to secular bloggers, "I consider such writings as not free thinking but filthy words. Why anyone would write such things? It's not at all acceptable if anyone writes against our prophet or other religions. Why would the government take responsibility if such writings lead to any untoward incidents? Everyone should maintain decency. Or else the government wouldn't take the responsibility for any uncivilised attitude."

One need not agree with another person's opinions on religion to recognize their right to express those opinions and live in relative peace. The answer to objectionable expression must not be violence, but counter-expression. These killings of innocent writers, bloggers, publishers, activists, and religious believers - simply for peacefully exercising their basic freedoms - are robbing Bangladesh of bright minds and brave human rights defenders. It is inexcusable that government officials have, by and large, sided with violent extremists, asked citizens to self-censor, and failed to provide enough protection or hold the killers to account. Bangladesh has made commitments to uphold fundamental human rights. The Constitution guarantees all citizens the rights to life (Article 32), freedom of conscience and speech (Article 39), and freedom of religion (Article 41). Additionally, Bangladesh is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which protects the right to life (Article 6), to not be discriminated against on various grounds (Article 2), to freedom of thought, conscience, or religion (Article 18), and to freedom of expression (Article 19). These rights include the liberty to adopt or not adopt a religious belief, to change or leave a religion or belief, to observe and manifest one's religion or belief, either individually or in community, and to speak freely and engage in public discourse about one's beliefs, ideas, or convictions - without fear of reprisal attacks or government crackdowns.

We therefore call on:

The Bangladesh government to vigorously protect the full exercise of the freedoms of religion, belief, and expression, threatened atheists, secularists, minorities, and all those exercising their rights in their country;

Bangladesh government officials to stop citing religion as a justification to refuse the rights of certain Bangladeshis in public statements, and forcefully and categorically condemn violent attacks on atheists, secularists, minorities, and all those exercising their rights in their country;

The Bangladesh government to conduct prompt, thorough, effective, independent, and impartial investigations into the killings since February 2015, and ensure that all those responsible are brought to justice in fair trials which respect international standards;

The international community to extend support and provide assistance to Bangladesh to address this human rights crisis.

Signed

INDIVIDUALS

Alan Levinovitz, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy and Religion, James Madison University
Amit R. Baishya, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of English, University of Oklahoma
Amrapali Basumatary, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of English, Kirori Mal College, University of Delhi
Ania Loomba, PhD, Catherine Bryson Professor of English, University of Pennsylvania
Anirban Baishya, PhD, School of Cinematic Arts, University of South California
Ann Grodzins Gold, PhD, Chair, Department of Religion, Thomas J. Watson Professor of Religion and Professor of Anthropology, Syracuse University
Aruni Kashyap, Writer and Translator
Boris van der Ham, Chairman, Dutch Humanist Association
Deeyah Khan, Filmmaker and Activist
Doranne Jacobson, Research Associate, Columbia University
Elham Manea, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Zurich
Fariborz Pooya, Host, Bread and Roses TV
Geraldine Forbes, PhD, Distinguished Teaching Professor Emerita, Department of History, State University of New York at Oswego
Imran H. Sarker, Blogger and Secular Activist, Bangladesh
Karen Leonard, PhD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Irvine
Khushi Kabir, Feminist and Human Rights Activist
Maajid Nawaz, Author and Activist, Founding Chairman, Quilliam
Madhurima Chakraborty, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of English, Columbia College Chicago
Makiko Kimura, PhD, Associate Professor, Tsuda College, Shimin Gaikou Centre
Marieme Helie Lucas, Former Faculty (Social Sciences), Algiers University, Founder Secularism Is A Women's Issue
Maryam Namazie, Spokesperson, Council of Ex-Muslims of, Britain and One Law for All, Producer, Bread and Roses TV
Massimo Pigliucci, K.D. Irani Professor of Philosophy, City College of New York
Michael De Dora, Director of Public Policy; UN Representative Center for Inquiry
Mitul Baruah, PhD Candidate, Geography Department, Syracuse University
P.B. Cliteur, PhD, Professor of Jurisprudence, University of Leiden
Ranabir Samaddar, PhD, Distinguished Chair in Migration and Forced Migration Studies Calcutta Research Group
Reza Aslan, Author and Religious Scholar
Richard Dawkins, Emeritus Professor, University of Oxford
Russell Blackford, PhD, School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Newcastle, NSW
Salman Rushdie, Novelist
Sam Harris, PhD, Author and Neuroscientist
Sean Dowdy, PhD Candidate, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago
Shelley Feldman, PhD, Professor, Department of Development Sociology, Cornell University
Steven Pinker, PhD, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University
Susan Wadley, PhD, Director, South Asia Center, Syracuse University
Suzanne Hanchett, PhD, Partner, Planning Alternatives for Change LLC
Varuni Bhatia, PhD, Assistant Professor, Asian Languages and Cultures Department, University of Michigan

ORGANIZATIONS

American Atheists
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-Asia)
Bangladesh Group - The Netherlands (Bangladesh Groep Nederland)
21st Century Wilberforce Initiative
American Humanist Association
Atheist Alliance International
Blogger & Online Activist Network-Bangladesh
British Humanist Association
Canadian Journalists for Free Expression
Canadian Secular Alliance
Center for Inquiry
Dutch Humanist Association (Humanistisch Verbond)
International League of Non-Religious and Atheists (Germany)
Centre for Inquiry - Canada
Centre for Secular Space UK
Christian Solidarity Worldwide - UK
Council of Australian Humanist Societies
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain
European Humanist Federation
Hamburg Foundation for Politically Persecuted
International Humanist and Ethical Union
The Hague Peace Projects
Organizing Committee, Chittagong Hill Tracts Campaign
Insan Foundation Trust
Liberty South Asia
Mukto-Mona
One Law for All
PEN American Center
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science
Progressive Atheists, Inc. (Australia)
Muslims for Progressive Values
Raif Badawi Foundation for Freedom
Rationalist Society of Australia
Secular Coalition for America
Secular Coalition of Australia
Secularism Is A Women's Issue
Secular Party of Australia

Join us

SIGN Here

[awoke_in_2003]

1. Just as we need to stand up to our

fundie nutcases, so do others around the world. In is a fight that must be fought by those affected. When we barge in both sides gain a common enemy. It is good to see some standing up.

[Albertoo]

2. A handful of intellectuals vs the radicalized masses, who will win?

For Bangladeshi politicians, it will take about one nanosecond to decide.

[rug]

3. Despite Sam Harris signing this, I say you're wrong.

It is not "radicalized masses" supporting these killings, it is a numerically small collection of rootless terrorists. No group of 150,000,000 people want to live in a place of sporadic murder by machete.

To the extent these murders are ideologically driven, they can be ideologically blocked.

[Albertoo]

6. Poll figures and facts on the ground do not tally with your opinions

Sentence by sentence:

It is not "radicalized masses" supporting these killings, it is a small collection of rootless terrorists.

does not reflect reality. Killings enjoy popular support.
Example: 25,000 assailants participated in the 2012 Ramu attacks on Buddhist monasteries.
Hardly a "small collection of rootless terrorists".

No group of 150,000,000 people want to live in a place of sporadic murder by machete.

Half of Bangladeshis support the death penalty for apostasy.
Again, not a marginal collection of rootless terrorists.

To the extent these murders are ideologically driven, they can be ideologically blocked.

If anything, the pendulum is swinging the other way in Bangladesh.
Jamaat i Islami is pushing for a Pakistani-style blasphemy law which would criminalize criticism of Islam. So much for ideologically blocking the root of religious extremism.

[rug]

8. Do post your data.

ID am far more interested in facts than your opinions.

[Albertoo]

9. Pew research 2013 The World’s Muslims. wiki should give you the Ramu killings

And mirroring back at me what I told you is weak: you ventured opinions, I stuck to facts.

[rug]

10. It may, but wiki isn't making the claim. You are.

[Albertoo]

11. I did not make a claim, I stated a fact (Ramu) which disproves your opinion

The opinion you stated in this way

It is not "radicalized masses" supporting these killings, it is a small collection of rootless terrorists.

is belied notably by the Ramu incident. Which is a fact.

[Dorian Gray]

5. I don't think it's true

that the masses of Bangladeshi are radicalized.

[Albertoo]

7. How do you define radical?

Support in Bangladesh:
- 80% for the Sharia
- 50% for death for adultery or apostasy
- 30% for honor killings

Do you still do not think the Bangladeshi masses are radical?

[Dorian Gray]

4. These are brave people

Things haven't ended well for anti-Islamists in Bangladesh.