Religion
Related: About this forumPeople of no religion outnumber Christians in England and Wales
People "having no religion rose from 25% in 2011 to 48.5% in 2014"?
That's 23% of the population dropping religion in just three years?
Sounds almost too good to be true, but if it is, it's awesome
Proportion of population who identify as having no religion rose from 25% in 2011 to 48.5% in 2014, surveys show
The number of people who say they have no religion is rapidly escalating and significantly outweighs the Christian population in England and Wales, according to new analysis.
The proportion of the population who identify as having no religion referred to as nones reached 48.5% in 2014, almost double the figure of 25% in the 2011 census. Those who define themselves as Christian Anglicans, Catholics and other denominations made up 43.8% of the population.
The striking thing is the clear sense of the growth of no religion as a proportion of the population, said Stephen Bullivant, senior lecturer in theology and ethics at St Marys Catholic University in Twickenham, who analysed data collected through British Social Attitudes surveys over three decades.
The main driver is people who were brought up with some religion now saying they have no religion. What were seeing is an acceleration in the numbers of people not only not practising their faith on a regular basis, but not even ticking the box. The reason for that is the big question in the sociology of religion.
The report did not examine data from Scotland or Northern Ireland. Last month a Scottish Social Attitudes survey found that 52% of the population said they were not religious, compared with 40% in 1999.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/23/no-religion-outnumber-christians-england-wales-study?CMP=share_btn_tw
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Wow.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)So a direct comparison of the 2 numbers is probably simplistic. from the report's footnotes:
than recorded by the national Censuses of both 2001 and 2011. The discrepancy
between the Census and a large number of other social surveys (which generally
concur with the BSAs lower figures) has been much discussed. While this is
not the place to delve too deeply into technical issues, it is worth noting that the
Census religion question (What is your religion?) is rather different to the BSAs
(What religion, if any, do you consider yourself belonging to?). On this subject,
see: D. Voas and S. Bruce, Research Note: The 2001 Census and Christian
Identification in Britain, Journal of Contemporary Religion 19/1 (2004), 23-8; and
A. Day, Believing in Belonging: Belief and Social Identity in the Modern World
(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
http://www.stmarys.ac.uk/benedict-xvi/docs/2016-may-contemporary-catholicism-report.pdf
Figure 1.3 in the report shows a slow increase in 'no religion' since 1983, from about 40%.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Encouraging nonetheless!
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)The last strongholds of religion appear to be the areas where Catholicism, the more retrograde form of Christianity, is leading (Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Poland).
The voodoo cult of the protective patron saint is comforting, it seems..
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)The Fastest Growing Group Of Americans Doesnt Identify With Any Particular Religion
http://thinkprogress.org/culture/2015/05/12/3657691/fastest-growing-group-americans-dont-identify-particular-religion/
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)another political group with ploys to try to control the masses. It's just been horrific what some do in the name of religion, not all, but it happens often enough. Thanks for the link!
rug
(82,333 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)I left out the smiley. It's too embarassing.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)Something the person in your avatar would have approved of.
rug
(82,333 posts)Without religion being used as yet another commodity to exploit, it would be quite benign.
I suspect, given a choice, you prefer a world with capitalism but without religion, rather than the converse.
Albertoo
(2,016 posts)The case for religion is purely negative:
- zero evidence it's real, zero superior morality
- evidence of vicious divisiveness
Capitalism is the default position
- capital accumulation -> large investments -> technological progress
- anticapitalism fails (Holodomor and Great Leap Forward famines = 20M dead)
Capitalism can be amended into social democracy, while religion stays useless and dangerous.
rug
(82,333 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)You really enjoy High School debating club tricks, don't you?
rug
(82,333 posts)Albertoo
(2,016 posts)mr blur
(7,753 posts)You're welcome.