Stop assuming that families with lots of children are religious

[rug]

Timothy and Kyla Buller of Bismarck, N.D., with their seven children (Mandy Moracco Photography)

By Julie Zauzmer
May 31

The Buller family goes out to dinner once a week. When they pass by other tables, “their eyes kind of speak volumes,” Kyla Buller said. “You can see them counting.”

One, two, three, four, five, six, seven. That’s right. Seven kids in the Buller household.

“There’s a lot of people that just assume,” Buller said. “They say, ‘Oh, you must be churchgoers. You must be religious.'”

They’re not.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2016/05/31/stop-assuming-that-families-with-lots-of-children-are-religious/

[niyad]

1. every person is entitled to choice, but one does wonder if they have heard of zpg and C3

[edhopper]

2. so not All big families are religious.

Who said they were.
But nones are less likely than any other religious group.

[rug]

4. If I could diagram that sentence I might have a response.

[edhopper]

5. too much auto-complete

updated.

Anyway, The Americans and the off to bed.

[uppityperson]

3. I know people on all parts of the religious/non spectrum with few and many kids

Don't assume.